Liar Paradox

Does "Liar Paradox" requires this crappy Axiom of Infinity, that "for all N there exit N+1 > N"?
Because if you don't believe Axiom of Infinity, then for some theory (or program) N, you can't construct it's Liar structure, as it would require more memory than you have physically.

Of course, jews would say, that without infinity there is no mathematics, but why do we need this jewish tendency toward abstraction and casuistry anyway? Can you show us practical usefulness of your deceptive regilious theories, jews?

>>8
Calculus is used in many, many applied fields. There's no argument to be had here; unless you're secluded from society in a shack you built yourself, magically beaming posts to this board, you are already reaping the practical benefits of maths.