Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

worshiping infinity

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-05 10:10

...makes you infinitely stupid, you cantor-faggots.

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-05 10:40

you can't have infinite on a computer
>>>/sci/

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-05 10:46

>>2
what about big O?

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-05 10:51

THOUGHT EXPERIMENT
INFINITE TAPE MARKED OUT INTO SQUARES
INFINITESIMAL ASYMPTOTICS

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-05 10:56

>>2
IEEE 754 disagrees with you.

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-05 11:46

In Haskell division by zero gives infinity. Also http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=1%2F0

so you can divide by zero.

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-05 12:37

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-05 13:37

It’s really sad that in a technical age, where more and more people are engineers, scientists and computer programmers, we don’t have this deep societal appreciation for math and science.  The same thing that makes people freely admit their math skills also affects college curricula.  Look at the required curricula at most liberal arts colleges, which proudly proclaim the value of the “well-rounded” education that they give.  There are very few math/science/computer/engineering classes, and extremely few math classes in particular.  What requirements there are can always be filled by worthless classes.  Then look at the curricula for technical, math/science-focused schools.  They always have a substantial humanities requirement, and a totally unscientific survey of people I know has found that there tend to be few joke courses to fill those requirements, and that most students don’t take them.

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-05 13:45

In this day and age, there is no excuse for brushing off math.  It’s tough if you’re bad at it, especially since faking competency is a lot harder in math than in the humanities.  Nevertheless, brushing it off and not caring is not an acceptable defense mechanism.  There’s a part of me that really wants, next time I hear someone say “I was always bad at math” to respond with “Well, I guess you’re just stupid.”  It’s obviously not the correct response, but at least it’d move the average in the right direction.

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-05 14:05

>>9
The correct response would be "That's because you're being a sheep".

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-05 14:09

>>10
The correct response would be "That's because you're getting laid".

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-05 14:11

>>1
View of plotting results inside the worksheet or in a separate window

Name: VIPPER 2010-12-05 14:12

>>11
Get out JEWS!

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-05 14:14

>>13
lol u mad?

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-23 11:35

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-27 18:28


Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List