Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-4041-

Preferred language

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-04 20:12

I'm curious: which is /prog/'s preferred programming language?
ITT: Just tell in one statement which is your preferred language and why.

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-04 20:42

ASM because i can do ANYTHING[/sup]

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-04 21:07

The Algorithmic Language Scheme. This Algorithmic Language Scheme is primarily a functional programming language. It shares many characteristics with other members of the Lisp programming language family. The Algorithmic Language Scheme's very simple syntax is based on s-expressions, parenthesized lists in which a prefix operator is followed by its arguments. The Algorithmic Language Scheme programs thus consist of sequences of nested lists.

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-04 21:17

>>2
pretty much

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-04 21:21

Haskell because it makes me look smarter.

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-04 21:50

Scheme because it makes me look like an idiot.

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-04 22:24

>>1
Common Lisp, because I don't like to fuck around. Common Lisp doesn't give a shit, it just does work.

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-04 22:27

No specific language, but I tend to prefer Common Lisp for most high-level code, C for mid-level code, and my platform's assembly (usually x86 in intel syntax) for low-level tasks. Other languages may be used in case doing some task in them would be less effort than in other languages, for example, if I need to make something to integarte with .NET, I may write some C# code, although if it was something large-scale, I may consider using something else. I also have no qualms about mixing languages where it saves me time and effort.

Just use the right tool for the job as you see fit.

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-04 23:06

C++. Because I care about speed. It allows me to write extremely fast (vectors, hashes, algorithms) and speed of executable as high as I am.

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-04 23:10

Ruby because it makes me look like a rockstar.

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-04 23:43

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-04 23:47

>>11
That's so true, that it hurts.

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-04 23:51

Python and C. I like to prototype on python and do all serious coding in C.

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-05 0:07

I like to use VB6 because VB .NET is too slow.

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-05 0:13

Perl: because no one should be able to read my code when I'm done. Not even me.

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-05 1:20

>>15
Learn to Q, ``faggot''

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-05 4:30

Python, because it's the best balance of decent language and available libraries.
If we're going purely by language, Scheme or Haskell.

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-05 6:52

C++ has an awesome userbase and a great set of libraries. Just look at Boost! It's also really fast, having outperformed all the other languages in this thread on shootout.alioth.debian.org.

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-05 7:32

>>18
>Python 3     1.00    1.00    9.72    50.30    115.87    275.08    357.13
>Ruby 1.9     3.96    3.96    11.31    71.83    343.76    842.45    933.11

Oh look at these posers.

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-05 8:23

Python 3 is slow as fuck.

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-05 8:53

>>17
Listen to this man

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-05 9:04

perl6. I think is just so cool doing old work in new ways :)

So cool i can neglect speed for now.

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-05 10:06

Perl because I spend way too much time administering servers and using irssi.

I like using Python stuff, but I just can't bring myself to write it.

Common Lisp is awesome.

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-05 10:38

C++ because there isn't a better alternative.

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-05 10:56

Python for consistent stuff, Bash for helper stuff

C++ for other apps.

And Go (http://golang.org). Try it out. It might not be as mature as C++, but it's very promising. The only thing that really hurts about Go is the way the binaries are generated... I can only hope some day someone writes a Go compiler with LLVM, because the current way of binary generation is just far too [b][u]ENTERPRISE[/u][/b]y (read: shitty and retarded... just translate Go into an intermediate language and compile it with GCC, or whatever. don't reinvent the wheel if you don't really have to).

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-05 11:41

Perl 6, for being Perl done right. Still flexible, much more modern. Still using Perl 5 when I need speed

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-05 11:44

>>25
>Try it out.
Not before it'll get generics. It's 21st century, damn it.

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-05 12:12

>>27
Not before it'll get generics. It's 21st century, damn it.
Unlikely as long as Go doesn't even do lookahead for braces.

Putting braces on the same line as the expression is PIG DISGUSTING

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-05 13:24

I would talk about ocaml but its interpreter is too busy crashing

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-05 13:51

PL/I the language that would have been the universal programming language had unix not made C so prevalent

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-05 15:48

>>25
Go is just a another shitty thing google has made in an attempt to be part of EVERYTHING

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-05 16:27

I have significant experience with C,C++,Java,PHP.

C is the best.
PHP for anything web. (web programming is a hack anyhow)
C++ for nothing. (I MEAN THAT)
Java see C++ and then some.

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-05 17:26

>>30
Or rather, if Mulics would have been any good (or completed on schedule) PL/I would've been more common.

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-05 17:29

>>33
Mulics

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-05 18:17

>>32

C is best
look at me mommy, i'm using a compiler

PHP for anything web. (web programming is a hack anyhow)
I never learned PHP, but all of the cool kids use it, so it must be an awesome language rite guize?

C++ for nothing. (I MEAN THAT)
I don't understand C++, therefore C++ is shit

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-05 18:39

>>35
faggot

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-05 18:55

>>35
LOOK AT ME I CAN MAKE FUN OF ANOTHER PERSON'S OPINIONS BECAUSE THEY DON'T LIKE WHAT I LIKE

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-05 19:42

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-05 19:47

English or Russian

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-05 20:32

>>38
same could be said for you.

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-05 21:32

>>40
I read this guy using the "psychological projection" card everyday here at /prog/, even using the same URLs.

I would code something to parse it, causes me lotsa LOLing.

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-05 21:42

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-05 22:22

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-05 23:48

>>38

Why hello there E-Psychatrist, how are you?

>>36,37
samefag

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-05 23:51

>>44
samefag
/Polecat kebabs/

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-05 23:53

>>45
*samefag

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-06 1:00

>>45-46
Fuck off, ``faggot''.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 0:47

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List