/prog/ challenge: me, you, and The Sussman

We all know there are only three people on /prog/ — me, you, and The Sussman trolling us. Still, there are multiple established personae on /prog/. By the ⁶⁶Three Person Lemma⁹⁹, each one of them must be either me, you, or The Sussman. The challenge is to either divide the following list into three finite subsets that describe each of the posters on /prog/ or to prove that the task is impossible, disproving the lemma.

1. Me
2. You
3. The Sussman
4. The guy who sages a lot
5. The guy who refuses to sage for no good reason
6. The guy who refuses to sage with a good reason
7. The guy from /jp/
8. The guy from /b/
9. The guy from /pr/
10. The guy who can't program at all
11. Smug LISP weenie
12. Smug C weenie
13. Smug Haskell nomad
14. Enterprise Java suit
15. Sepples faggot
16. The proportional font guy
17. Sergeant Sagetank
18. Hotaru
19. MrVacBob-kun-sama
20. Erika
21. Christopher
22. Xarn
23. FrozenVoid
24. Jamestopher
25. UMH memesmith
26. HMA meme fan
27. HAXUS THE GREAT
28. The anusposter
29. The wayward freshman
30. The imageboard paladin
31. The guy who keeps saying ``cromulent''
32. The ``faggot quotes'' guy
32. The ``Stop using ``faggot quotes'''' guy
33. Haskell the dead dog
34. The -- guy
35. The necroposter
36. MILKRIBS4k
37. The opiates spammer
38. rand(all)
39. The Anticudder
40. Richard Stallman
41. MDickie
42. Leah Culver
43. Flaming prescriptivist faggot
44. Flaming descriptivist faggot
45. The EMACS advocate
46. The Textmate screencasts guy
47. The VIM advocate
48. The bloat guy
49. The elitist BSD anushole
50. The Touhou guy
51. The guy who refuses to install Flash

>>37
I DO THAT TOO
IM >>40

>>40
Implying someone on /prague/ can actually program

Im the guy who started these threads

"haskell is a medium sized dog"
"Fuck classes roles are the new best thing"
and asked about your thoughts on ParrotVM, thinking that i might get an honest opinion.(silly me)

i posted in "sexy programming"

ITT >>1 promotes his faggotry.

         -------                                     -------
       -/       \-                                 -/       \-
      /           \-------------------------------/           \
      |   E G O   |         N O N   E S T         |    T U    |
      \           /-------------------------------\           /
       -\       /-    \-----             -----/    -\       /-
         \-----\            \-----------/            /-----/
          \     \---  EST    -/       \-    EST  ---/     /
           \- N  \- \----   /           \   ----/ -/  N -/
             \ O   \     \--|  /prog/   |--/     /   O / 
              \ N   \       \           /       /   N /  
               \     \-      -\       /-       /     /   
                \  E   \       -------       -/  E  /    
                 \- S   \       | E |       /   S -/     
                   \ T   \      | S |      /   T /       
                    \     \-    | T |    -/     /        
                     \      \   |   |   /      /         
                      \      \ ------- /      /          
                       \-    -/       \-    -/           
                         \  /           \  /             
                          \ |  SVSSMAN  | /              
                           \\           //               
                             -\       /-                 
                               -------

>>46
a = b ∧ c = b ⊢ a = c
I think it would have been better to use est copia inferior de and sectio copiarum vacuus than est and non est.

>>47
cannot construct the infinite type: poster = [poster]!!

I made Æ.

TOMATO, TOMATŒ̇́S.

TOMATO, TOMATŒS.
Fucking Unicode.

Fucking Unicodes how do they work?

İ̇̇̇̇̇̇ ḍ̣̣̣̣̣̣̣̣ü̈̈̈̈̈̈̈̈̈̈̈̈ṇ̣̣̣̣̣̣̣̣̣̣̣̣ṅ̇̇̇̇̇̇̇̇ọ̣̣̣̣̣̣̣ ļ̧̧̧̧ó́́́́́l̨̨̨̨̨̨̨̨̨
Why aren't the diacritics superposed? When I type them in I see
ü̈̈ as ü
and i̇̇̇ as ı.

RICARDVS MATEVS STALLMAN

STALMANVS

ĀNUM MEAM OBLIGO

VEXILLO CIVITATIVM XARNÆ FOEDERATARVM



                                .-.
                               {{@}}
               <>               8@8
             .::::.             888
         @\\/W\/\/W\//@         8@8
          \\/^\/\/^\//     _    )8(    _
           \_O_<>_O_/     (@)__/8@8\__(@)
      ____________________ `~"-=):(=-"~`
     |<><><>  |  |  <><><>|     |.|
     |<>BAMPV |  |      <>|     |S|
     |<>      |  |      <>|     |'|
     |<>   .--------.   <>|     |.|
     |     |   ()   |     |     |P|
     |_____| (O\/O) |_____|     |'|
     |     \   /\   /     |     |.|
     |------\  \/  /------|     |U|
     |       '.__.'       |     |'|
     |        |  |        |     |.|
     :        |  | XARNÆ  :     |N|
      \<>     |  |     <>/      |'|
       \<>    |  |    <>/       |.|
        \<>   |  |   <>/        |K|
         `\<> |  | <>/'         |'|
     gjs   `-.|  |.-`           \ /
              '--'               ^

>>54-56
Back to Brazil.

VEXILLO CIVITATIVM XARNÆ FŒDERATARVM

ANVS

>>1
See, #10 through #15 will give us some clues. I'm none of these: I can program, and I'm a Python faggot. At most, I can be the smug LISP weenie, but I'm not the one posting CL chunks so I'm probably not the LISP faggot.

So there's the guy who can't program at all; at most he must be the C, Java or Sepples faggot, but hardly at the same time (an OMG OPTIMIZED guy will be C and Sepples, an ENTERPRISE guy will be Java and Sepples, but never C and Java without Sepples). That must be you, because I am not him and the Sussman can obviously program, so you can't program at all, and if you can't program at all.

The Sussman is probably the LISPer, but I can't picture him as a Haskell weenie. I'm not a Haskell weenie either, neither are you because you can't program at all and wouldn't have even the slightest clue what Haskell is about.

This makes me think the ⁶⁶Three Person Lemma⁹⁹ is false, although I can provide no formal proof as you could be guy who can't program, I know who I am, and The Sussman could be trolling as a LISP, C, Haskell, Java, Sepples and C faggot alternatively.

Oh, bampu.

HAX MY ANVS

>>60,62,120
Way to bump a five year old thread.

~bampu pantsu~~~

>>60
but never C and Java without Sepples
THAT'S WHERE YOU'RE WRONG, CHUMP!
C is tolerable enough to write most code in.
Java, although bad, manages to do what it says it should, at least better than Sepples.
Also Sepples will never be OMG OPTIMISED because it's almost as bad as Perl for feeling like you're programming through gardening gloves.

pantsu

>>65
Way to bump a five year old thread.

   |\                     /)
 /\_\\__               (_//
|   `>\-`     _._       //`)
 \ /` \\  _.-`:::`-._  //
  `    \|`    :::    `|/
        | BAM ::: PV  |
        |.....:::.....|
        |:::::::::::::|
        |     :::     |
        \ XAR ::: NÆ  /
         \    :::    /
          `-. ::: .-'
           //`:::`\\
          //   '   \\
         |/         \\

this thread sucks

>>69
fuck you this is an epic win thread

>>69
How about I slap you're shit aspie faggot?

   |\                     /)
 /\_\\__               (_//
|   `>\-`     _._       //`)
 \ /` \\  _.-`:::`-._  //
  `    \|`    :::    `|/
        | BAM ::: PV  |
        |.....:::.....|
        |:::::::::::::|
        |     :::     |
        \ XAR ::: NÆ  /
         \    :::    /
          `-. ::: .-'
           //`:::`\\
          //   '   \\
         |/         \\

>>1
Are you implying that me and you are a different person?

I am the guy who asked about smalltalk.

I just got from a library a copy of K&R. It is a fun book.

>>39
Point of anonymageboards is anonymity is optional.

>>1
All of those are one person, me and I!

check my anonymous dubs

>>0-
is me

>>,-,
It's me, Mario!

1. me
2. Lain
3. The Sussman