If programming languages were brass

ASM: didgeridoo
C: bugle
C++: vuvuzela
Forth: cornett (zink)
Haskell: tuba
Lisp: the horn
Perl: trombone
Python: slide trumpet
Ruby: sackbut

The more of these threads get created, they closer they are to random mappings from one category onto another.

If you're going to waste the time putting one of these together, at least put an ounce of thought into it.  Wouldn't ASM just be a big pile of brass scraps?  "Lisp: the horn" because, yeah, that makes sense.

What on Earth is zink?

>>2,3
I'm sorry you don't know your brass instruments.

ASM: in some ways the most flexible one, but also extremely limited. Basically impossible to write normal programs with. You can't play a pile of brass scraps, btw.

C: Very constrained, but also very basic. Any programmer should be able to operate it.

C++: Like C, but shittier.

Forth: kind of weird compared to the others, but also extremely flexible.

Haskell: the "deep" language.

Lisp: difficult for others to use, but very nuanced.

Perl: obnoxious.

Python: like perl, but sillier.

Ruby: like Python and perl, but even less useful.

Forgive me for expecting you all to know anything or think for yourselves.

LISP THE HORN

Java: Penny whistle

Ruby would be a dildo.

A didgeridoo is not a brass instrument, you cabbage-raping phonegobbler.

>>8
dildo
for fags and girls
would be

Java: drums

>>10
I also like how >>8 called a dildo a blowing instrument.

Scheme: Kazoo
Erlang: Bagpipes

If programming languages were bras

C is a sax.

>>9,15
Probably think brass instruments are any and only instruments made of brass.

>>13
Those aren't brass either.

>>16
Your ``implication'' makes no sense. Are you brain-dead?

>>16
JUST LIKE WOODWIND AM I CORRECT

PHP: Java

>>19
Terrible!

>>17
There is no '`implication`'.

ML : Harp
Visual Basic: Bongoes

I still think >>8 is the only good post in this thread.

I still think 1282579382 is the only good thread in this series.

Don't change these.

Name:		Email:
Entire Thread Thread List