Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

is flash bad progamming???

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-16 5:08

sum1 on lounge always saids that flash is bad and will infekted my pc if use but i really like youtube video (justen beiber is soooo hot and lady gaga is queen) so i have it installed! is this bad?

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-16 5:12

Get the fuck out.

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-16 5:15

Yes flash is bad because of the loopholes and exploits in the programming.  It's the ultimate real time web software/programming atm, but it's untamed.  You can't live without it so whatever.  Go lady gaga and justin bieber.

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-16 5:16

>>2
y so rude!!! i jst want to no if i am @ risk with my flash installed or not!!! is lounge guy laying to me!!! plz help

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-16 5:17

>>3
thnx!!!

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-16 5:17

>>3
What about HTML 5/projects like Gnash, etc.?

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-16 5:20

>>6
Guess they won't be be picked up by major companies until they can prove their worth against flash.

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-16 5:22

>>7
But HTML 5 is being promoted as an "open" sort of thing, and YouTube has an experimental HTML 5 player right now. Also Gnash has come a long way.

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-16 5:28

>>3
Oh but you can live without flash if you use one of the many video download sites that are available.

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-16 5:28

It all doesn't matter without third party programs that must be installed and the program's versatility that allows for it process or use other system resources while browsing it doesn't matter.  Flash currently has it all set up and html 5 is just open coding without a real executable and probably same with gnash?

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-16 5:32

>>9
Why not just program your own .flv player and call it even.

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-16 5:36

>>10
HTML 5 is a work in progress standard. Gnash is just a FOSS alternative to Adobe's flash. http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/Overview.html

The big thing holding HTML 5 back is what video codec to decide on using.

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-16 5:40

>>11
Because doing that does not interest me as I prefer to have all the videos I like saved on my DAS for future offline viewing. Streaming video is for chumps!

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-16 5:43

>>13
Okay, so you troll by telling people that you don't like to use flash inside your Web browser. I just have one question, are you the same guy who was shitposting in /lounge/ that got himself banned twice?

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-16 5:45

>>13
No way.  Streaming video is awesome for real time interaction.  But with Flash you're always under one process at a given time.  Hopefully with these other new up and coming web software there will be more flexibility.  Flash is for real time web processing but you always gotta play by their rules cause of Adobe and their changes to Flash.

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-16 5:56

>>14
Trollng? What trolling? And no I've never been banned from lounge. In fact, I didn't even know that the textboard had mods!

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-16 5:56

>>15
Flash is an alright idea. I just wish Adobe didn't have a monopoly on it. :(

Name: REIHACKER 2010-07-16 6:00

As an expert computer hacker I get very hard at the thought of billions of sheeple having flash enabled pcs that I can easily exploit!

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-16 6:00

>>17
Not a monopoly. They invented it. It's a shit idea, poorly implemented.

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-16 6:02

>>19
WRONG.
MACROMEDIA BUILT FLASH
ADOBE BOUGHT OUT MACROMEDIA
AND THEN THEY TWISTED FLASH
WRONG WRONG WRONG WRONG!

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-16 6:04

>>19
Not a monopoly.
It is so.
They invented it.
Actually, Macromedia invented it, not Adobe. Adobe just bought the rights to the technology after they bought Macromedia.
It's a shit idea, poorly implemented.
No, it's a good idea, but I will agree that it is poorly implemented.

>>18
You mean cracker! That's right, honkey!

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-16 6:08

>>21
That's like saying Afghanistan has the monopoly on opium.

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-16 6:08

>>21
I miss old school flash.
Whenever I wanna reminesce.
I go to...
[url]
http://www.newgrounds.com
[end of url]

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-16 7:05

>>22
Actually, no. That's a terrible analogy. There are alternatives like Gnash, but they can only do so much.

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-16 7:14

>>24
That's like saying Dell has the monopoly on deluxe home computing machines.

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-16 7:40

>>25
Equally terrible analogy. Since Dell actually gets competition.

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-16 8:00

>>26
You don't appear to understand what I'm getting at. I thought you'd get it once I said “deluxe home computing machines”, but clearly, you have some form of mental retardation.

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-16 10:48

implying retardation from misunderstanding a vague remark
Oh you.

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-16 11:47

>>28
implying
Oh you
Pretending you're not >>26
Pretending it was at all vague
Pretending it wasn't a direct response in exactly the format that the post >>26 was replying to is in
Purposely misquoting because you can't think of something original
Fuck off, please.
Ignoring the possibility that irony could be on purpose

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-16 13:57

>>29
Back to /``faggot''/, please.

Name: SAGE! 2010-07-16 20:30

There are a lot of rude people ITT!

Name: 2010-07-16 20:34

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-17 6:55

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-17 15:10

>>31
Hey man, they're MAD, what do you expect?

Name: ​​​​​​​​​​ 2010-10-22 9:40

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 0:32

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 7:44

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 12:22

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List