Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

Debunking evolution

Name: Anonymous 2010-06-28 13:53

The C compiler is written in C.

How the fuck does that work? Where did C come from, fucking nowhere?

C, ANSI C? That's clearly microevolution. Have you ever seen C evolve into D? Of course not, because macroevolution is a figment of the computer evolutionists imagination.

Clearly there was a divine creator, as there is no way complexity such as C could have arisen by pure chance.

Name: Anonymous 2010-06-28 13:56

NO EXCEPTIONS

Name: Anonymous 2010-06-28 13:59

>>1
What will really fuck up your head is how the first assembler was writen.

IHBT

Name: Anonymous 2010-06-28 14:00

>>3
M-x butterfly-mode

Name: Anonymous 2010-06-28 14:01

>>1

Binary. Idiot.

Name: Anonymous 2010-06-28 14:09

>>3
Manually.

Name: Anonymous 2010-06-28 14:10

>>1
Clearly it came here from space.

Name: Anonymous 2010-06-28 14:26

FrozenVoid wrote it.

Name: Anonymous 2010-06-28 15:57

Bootstrapping

Name: Anonymous 2010-06-28 17:30

>>9
YHBT

Name: Anonymous 2010-06-28 20:29

>>10
Aww shit.

Name: Anonymous 2010-06-28 22:08

>>3
I've written a Z80 assembler in binary before, and a Pascal-like language compiler in assembler (that same one.) That was in what most people would probably consider the most absurd introductory computer science class ever.

Name: Anonymous 2010-06-29 1:52

>>9
Buttstrapping

Name: Anonymous 2010-06-29 13:27

Enjoy your AIDS AND FAIL, /prog/

Name: Anonymous 2010-06-29 13:52

>>12
I wrote a Z80 assembler in hexadecimal on my TI-83+ when I was in 8th grade.

Name: Anonymous 2010-06-29 14:24

Fucking compilers, how do they work?

Memes aside, they first wrote a compiler in assembly, and with that, they compiled another one, this one written in C, which is the one we use today.

Name: Anonymous 2010-06-29 14:32

Name: Anonymous 2010-06-30 23:25

B

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-01 0:05

>>17
The first self-hosting compiler (excluding assemblers) was written for Lisp by Hart and Levin at MIT in 1962. They wrote a Lisp compiler in Lisp, testing it inside an existing Lisp interpreter.

( ≖‿≖)

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-01 2:24

>>18
Probably not. From what I hear of BCPL I'd rather write it in assembler.

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-01 4:50

Part of the final project for an introduction to computer architecture course I took was manually converting from assembly to binary and from binary to assembly for a custom-designed for the class cpu(which even had an circuit-level emulator you could run on and watch execute).

CS EDUCATION: not a complete waste of time sometimes

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-01 5:21

Man that sounds cool in retrospect, but I'm betting actually doing it felt like sucking 12 cocks, confirm/deny?

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-01 5:32

>>21
30 minutes writing a trivial perl program not completely wasted. CS EDUCATION.

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-01 13:30

>>19
What was that Lisp interpreter written in?

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-01 13:44

>>23
You know damn well the time consuming part of that exercise is not writing the code, and that Perl would only waste your time at such a task.

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-01 14:04

>>25
There were any time consuming bits at all? Assembly<->binary conversion is just looking up tables of mnemonics, with a bit of variable substitution.

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-01 14:22

>>26
IIRC there people who memorized the x86 mnemonics and write hex code directly to file.

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-01 16:29

>>27
The Satori begins when you start executing them in your mind.

Name: Anonymous 2010-07-01 18:28

>>24
Lisp.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 16:51

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List