SICP PDF
1
Name:
Anonymous
2010-05-25 23:33
Hello /prog/. Is this a full copy of the latest version of SICP?
http://deptinfo.unice.fr/~roy/sicp.pdf
Thank you.
2
Name:
Anonymous
2010-05-25 23:42
4
Name:
Anonymous
2010-05-26 4:10
5
Name:
Anonymous
2010-05-26 7:10
Reported for warez.
6
Name:
Anonymous
2010-05-26 7:55
Isn't that book available in HTML format from its university's website?
7
Name:
Anonymous
2010-05-26 8:43
Why the fuck is that on piratebay, the book is free online.
8
Name:
Anonymous
2010-05-26 9:13
>>7-8
Yes, but it's not in beautiful PDF format.
9
Name:
Anonymous
2010-05-26 9:24
>>8
I prefer the HTML version to the PDF one.
10
Name:
Anonymous
2010-05-26 10:27
>>9
I prefer the PDF version to the HTML one.
But HTML is fine also.
11
Name:
Anonymous
2010-05-26 11:03
>>10
Yeah, I hate continuity also. Who needs complete pages when you can emulate a book, right?
12
Name:
Anonymous
2010-05-26 11:34
>>11
It's a pain in the ass to read HTML on an E-Book reader, not to mention it looks better as a PDF.
13
Name:
Anonymous
2010-05-26 11:43
pdf is touring complete
14
Name:
Anonymous
2010-05-26 12:56
i only like PDF because i dont want folders full of shit.
15
Name:
Anonymous
2010-05-26 13:50
>>14
Watch your speech, blasphemous scoundrel
16
Name:
Anonymous
2010-05-26 21:16
>>12
If it looks better then your reader is shit.
And it certainly looks like crap on a monitor as well as being a pain in the ass in general.
17
Name:
Anonymous
2010-05-27 0:26
>>16
Maybe you should buy a new monitor.
18
Name:
Anonymous
2010-05-27 4:22
Maybe you should buy an Ipad for viewing it.
19
Name:
Anonymous
2010-05-27 4:27
does it really matter which obsolete document format is better for reading SICP? text/plain is clearly superior to both.
20
Name:
Anonymous
2010-05-27 4:33
>>19
You need an obsolete format to enjoy an obsolete book in its true obsolescence.
21
Name:
Anonymous
2010-05-27 11:36
>>1-20
Holy shit, buy the book. It's made of paper, and it's better that way. Fuck screens.
22
Name:
Anonymous
2010-05-27 11:41
>>21
How do you grep paper?
23
Name:
Anonymous
2010-05-27 11:44
>>22
with your goddamned eyes and your motherfucking hands
24
Name:
Anonymous
2010-05-27 13:45
>>23
Don't you need to read from the start each time you try?
25
Name:
Anonymous
2010-05-27 13:59
>>22
There's an index in the back. Revolutionary, isn't it?
26
Name:
Anonymous
2010-05-27 14:27
>>25
Index containing the entire book in condensed form?
27
Name:
Anonymous
2010-05-27 14:49
>>26
Index containing an index.
I think indexes are mostly for
casual readers, though, and I hate the current dumbing down of the book market at the expense of the core readers.
That's why I'm currently writing a letter to Knuth to petition for new releases TAoCP to drop the index in the back in favour of a suffix array.
28
Name:
Anonymous
2010-05-27 14:52
>>27
hard fast trolling 8.8/10
29
Name:
Anonymous
2010-05-27 16:30
Awesome book.
30
Name:
Anonymous
2010-05-27 17:31
>>29
Sir, I agree. So much so, that it's
/prog 's bible.
31
Name:
Anonymous
2010-05-28 14:23
32
Name:
Anonymous
2010-05-28 19:20
33
Name:
Anonymous
2010-05-28 20:07
>>32
Do you want fries with that?
34
Name:
Anonymous
2010-05-28 21:31
35
Name:
Anonymous
2010-05-30 18:01
36
Name:
Anonymous
2010-05-30 18:41
>>35
Oh,
Harry , you jester!
37
Name:
Anonymous
2010-10-03 22:23
38
Name:
Anonymous
2010-10-04 15:24
And can't you simply print the HTML's version to a PDF file?
Or your using a so-retarded OS that does not offer it by default?
I know IHBT , but whatever.
39
Name:
Anonymous
2010-10-04 15:56
>>38
The HTML version is of fairly low quality.
40
Name:
Anonymous
2010-10-04 16:08
HTML's version
No parse.
41
Name:
Anonymous
2010-10-04 16:08
>>39
SICP is of fairly low quality.
42
Name:
Anonymous
2010-10-04 16:14
>>41
Your troll is of fairly low quality.
43
Name:
Anonymous
2010-12-05 14:06
thx op i cum on cat he hiss at penis
44
Name:
VIPPER
2010-12-05 14:07
45
Name:
Anonymous
2010-12-05 14:37
I need a fucking LaTeX source.
Somebody steal Sussman's, please!
46
Name:
Anonymous
2010-12-05 15:00
"One convention that we have is to use the names of fruits and vegetables for variables (only in small
code fragments, not in any real program, of course):
char pear[40];
double peach;
int mango = 13;
long melon = 2001;
This makes it easy to tell what's a C reserved word, and what's a name the programmer supplied.
Some people say that you can't compare apples and oranges, but why not—they are both hand-held
round edible things that grow on trees. Once you get used to it, the fruit loops really seem to help.
There is one other convention—sometimes we repeat a key point to emphasize it. In addition, we
sometimes repeat a key point to emphasize it."
Haha.
47
Name:
Anonymous
2010-12-05 15:20
>>46
Cool story, brother.
49
Name:
Anonymous
2011-02-03 6:28