Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

ZMODEM

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-09 15:06

It's well slow.
Hasn't anyone made any faster file transfer protocols?
It took years to send a 5.9Kb file even over USB.

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-09 15:07

Shut your whore mouth.

ZMODEM has bigger bits, softer blocks, and tighter ASCII ZMODEM.

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-09 15:13

tcp/ip + scp?

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-09 15:56

>>3
I can't use a network connection. It has to be a serial line.

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-09 15:57

Try using WIndows easy ahre 2008

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-09 17:17

>>4
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serial_Line_Internet_Protocol

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-09 17:33

>>4
Keep blaming the problems caused by your shitty uart on the protocol you're using. You'll get far in life that way.

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-10 1:06

Oh fuck, did we all wake up in the 1980s today?  (or 70s, or 60s..?)

*checks*
Nope, still cat6 have cable and 1000BaseT here... still transferring 110 megabytes per second...

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-10 1:45

110 megabytes per second
that's more than 9MB/sec under 1Gbit/sec... sounds like there's something wrong with your network... you're not running windows or gnu or some other braindamaged operating system, are you?

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-10 2:12

>>9
GNU isn't an Operating System.

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-10 4:18

>>10
[Citation Needed]

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-10 5:41

>>10
o rly

im thinking of installing it

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-10 10:44

>>9
110 megabytes per second = 880 megabits per second.
Between Microsoft Windows NT 6.1 systems and Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.4 systems.

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-10 12:38

>>13
1 gigabit per second = 1,000,000,000 bits per second1
(1 000 000 000 bits per second) - (110 MBps) = 9.20928955 MBps2

______
1. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_rate_units#Gigabit_per_second
2. http://www.google.com/search?hl=is&q=1000000000+bps+-+110+MBps

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-10 12:46

>>14
Scientists have no need to cite SI prefixes or search for simple equations (that they even get completely wrong) - go back to your canvas and brushes, please.

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-10 13:09

>>15
real scientists need to cite fucking everything. >>9 obviously didn't need to search (if he did search, he would have said 9.2 instead of 9). also, what are you on about saying that that's completely wrong? 1000BaseT is 1,000,000,000 bits per second.

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-10 13:20

>>16
Protip: even if you reach the ideal 1 Gb/sec in raw network speed, that does not mean you'll be getting anywhere near that in actual throughput.

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-10 13:37

>>16
SI prefixes are the international standard, so they do not need references - they are assumed as common knowledge, because they are common knowledge.

Also http://www.google.com/search?q=1Gbps+-+110MBps

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-10 14:17

>>18
yet even google manages to get it wrong.

ISO 802.3-2005 (http://voiplab.niu.edu.tw/IEEE/802.3/index.html) says:
1.4.77 bit rate (BR): The total number of bits per second transferred to or from the Media Access Control
(MAC). For example, 100BASE-T has a bit rate of one hundred million bits per second (108 b/s).

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-10 14:32

>>17
PROTIP: I get 110 megabytes per second in actual throughput over 1000BaseT with SMB/CIFS.

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-10 15:09

>>20
BROTIP: That's exactly what he said.

Name: Anonymous 2010-05-10 16:07

>>21
that what she...

what kind of a shit meme is this? even millhouse was a better meme.

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-26 1:27

Name: Anonymous 2013-01-19 23:46

/prog/ will be spammed continuously until further notice. we apologize for any inconvenience this may cause.
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List
All trademarks and copyrights on this site are owned by their respective parties. All comments and posts are the responsibility of their own posters.
- Tinychan + 2ch Mode -