typical atheist

23:17 -!- Allah [~Rebel@128.218.191.90.dyn.estpak.ee] has joined ##christian
23:17 < Allah> ALLAH IS BIGGER THAN UR SHITTY GOD NAILED TO A CROSS
23:19 -!- Allah is now known as Thor
23:19 < stpeter> okay
23:19 < Thor> srsly tho
23:19 < Thor> god doesnt exist
23:19 < Thor> just
23:19 < Thor> accept it
23:19 < Thor> and move on
23:19 < stpeter> so you don't beleive in allah?
23:19 < Thor> no
23:19 < stpeter> oh that's interesting
23:19 < Thor> never said i did
23:20 < Thor> but srsly
23:20 < Thor> you believe in god right?
23:22 < Thor> stpeter
23:22 < Thor> didnt think so
23:29 < Thor> god was a virgin
23:29 < Thor> what a fucking loser
23:30 < stpeter> Thor, I think you have a low IQ
23:30 < Thor> yea?
23:30 < Thor> since you believe in god
23:31 < Thor> yours is lower
23:31 < Thor> than mine
23:31 < Thor> :D
23:31 < stpeter> I presume you read that is some 'science' magazine?
23:31 < Thor> so you're saying god is real?
23:32 < Thor> or not?
23:32 < stpeter> I am saying that I think you have a low IQ because you are not engaging in any
             valuable discussion, instead all you are doing is displaying that you are
             easily misled by 'scientific' authorities
23:33 < Thor> what scientific authorities you speaking about?
23:33 < Thor> what genre?
23:33 < stpeter> 23:31 < stpeter> I presume you read that is some 'science' magazine?
23:33 < stpeter> since you seem to have missed it the first time
23:33 < Thor> wtf are you talking about
23:33 < stpeter> oh well, I guess I will let you alone now. Since you are not operating on a
             level that it is possible to interact meaningfully with
23:34 < Thor> no
23:34 < Thor> you believe in god
23:34 < Thor> thus
23:34 < Thor> making your speech shit
23:34 < Thor> i dont speak with shit
23:34 < Thor> so...
23:34 -!- Thor [~Rebel@128.218.191.90.dyn.estpak.ee] has left ##christian []

NO EXCEPTIONS

Smart people can troll too.

Science magazine what? The other dude has issues.

I'm Christian and <stpeter> isn't with us. Feel free to take him away.

There is no God but the Sussman and Xarn is His prophet.

>>4
implying that everything written in a science magazine should be taken as gospel

>>7
There's a slight difference between not taking something as gospel on one hand and slapping scare quotes on it and holding it up as the epitome of inaccuracy and heresy like this guy was doing on the other.

>>7
Don't think I implied that, but now I actually want to see a graph showing IQ distribution vs religion.

>>9
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:LynnHarveyNyborg-CountryBelieveGod-Intelligence.svg

Sources on that are a bit dodgy. There are plenty of other studies, though, and they all reach the same conclusions. Google for them.

I really wish people would stop turning /prog/ into a shittier bash.org

This is not a good example of a typical atheist IHBT

>>12
WHABT

>>10
if you knew anything about statistics you would know that diagram proves absolutely nothing

>>14
Other than a strong correlation, you mean?

>>10
Most show exactly that: there are the "smart" people who aren't at the top who feel they have to become atheist to become smarter, but these are the people who are still not smart enough to see that theology and science aren't playing in the same arena.  Classic sheeple syndrome.  Probably Lisp weenies too.

>>16
7/10
Most show exactly that: there are the "smart" people who aren't at the top who feel they have to become atheist to become smarter,
Becoming an atheist won't make you more intelligent. Seeing inconsitencies/contradictions/impossibilities in various common religions, and realizing that even if the concept of god can exist, and you can construct unfalsifiable theories where a god, for certain definitions of god (this is a very loaded word) could exist, but even if a god existed, it would not change anything in one's daily life. The likelyhood for a christian god to exist is very low, as the definition given in the bible is contradictory, but that does not deny the possibility of a god in itself. These are just natural conclusions that one would reach by themselves after some thought. In the end, one would realize that there are a few choices, either become an atheist by affirming the non-existence of god, which might never be corrected, unless actual evidence appears, which is highly unlikely or become agnostic where you decide that the existence of god(s) is possible, but unprovable, so the whole concept could be ignored for now. The agnostic choice is a lot more rational, but some hardcore atheists diss it in favor of the scientific choice of affirming something is true, until proven false. There's also the possibility of avoiding all talk of religion because the definition of "god" is either inconsistent, unclear or otherwise nonsense.
Classic sheeple syndrome.
I've had these thoughts, many years ago, long before I even had access to the internet. My parents actually happen to be religious.
Probably Lisp weenies too.
That hurt my feelings, as I am one smug Lisp weenie :(

>>7
implying
Back to the imageboards, please.

Implying YHNBT

>>17
Atheism and agnosticism aren't mutually exclusive. They aren't answers to the same question. Most atheists are agnostics.

You should read your Xarn.

How is this relating to ?prog?/

What is "God"? Is "God" like "Holocoust", "Infinity", "Set Theory" and other jewish inventions? Any good reasons to believe in all these nonsense jewish stories?

I know only one God. Its name is LISP. And it says that all infidels will suffer from frigidness and semicolon cancer.

(hail! 'everyone 'lisp-overlord)

>>18
Fuck off, ``faggot''.

>>26
Go back to /b/, ``autist''.

>>27
Fuck off, ``Sepples''.

>>28
Come from /prog/, {spoiler ``Lisp''}.

>>29
your sexpcode compiler isn't working

>>30
I forgot my C-x s.