Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

Perl.

Name: Anonymous 2010-04-14 8:40

Perl. Why does [spolier]/prog/[/spoiler] dislike it so much?

Name: Anonymous 2010-04-14 8:41

OH GOD DAMN

Name: Anonymous 2010-04-14 9:20

Yada Yada

Name: Anonymous 2010-04-14 10:47

P6 is going to have "yadda-yadda-yadda" operator.

Name: Anonymous 2010-04-14 10:50

>>4
that expression will simplify and you know it

Name: Anonymous 2010-04-14 12:52

>>4
Already in latest Perl (5.12)

Name: Anonymous 2010-04-14 13:39

There is more than one way to HAX MY ANUS.

Name: Anonymous 2010-04-14 22:55

Perl has too much junk in. That makes it easy to hate for all the clutter, but it is technically superior to most everything else out there: it's usually faster and subsumes all paradigm elements.

In practice the problem is that speed often comes from C, and so it isn't consummate with the pan-paradigmatic nature1, not to mention the fact that the latter is ritually abused in practice2 and worse: there are no clear visible signifiers as to which paradigm(s) the code accords, giving it its particular 'read-only' nature (this is compounded by the Chimera effect.)

[m][u]_______________________________________________________[/u
1. In fact, it is sleight of hand to claim speed and flexibility in this way, though pure Perl code is still considerably faster than a good number of other popular general-purpose languages.
2. By eg. combining elements which are not complimentary, producing behavior with wild discontinuities. This in particular is the Chimera effect, or simply a Chimera.[/m]

Name: Anonymous 2010-04-14 23:24

>>8
EXPERT BBCODEFAILURE

Name: Anonymous 2010-04-15 7:05

bump

Name: Anonymous 2010-04-15 11:09

Spring cleaning anti-bump.

Name: Anonymous 2010-04-15 15:34

it's usually faster and subsumes all paradigm elements.

SOUNDS LIKE C++

Name: Anonymous 2010-04-15 16:51

>>12
Except C++ isn't usually faster than the languages it competes with. I'm not sure where I stand on the subsumption of paragigm elements, but that really depends on how you take the sample.

Name: Anonymous 2010-04-15 19:24

http://use.perl.org/~pmichaud/journal/40248

⒈  pmichaud promises Perl6 in April.
⒉  Perfection is an affront to God.
⒊  pmichaud’s wife gets cancer.
⒋  No Perl6.  Again.

Name: Anonymous 2010-04-15 19:41

>>14
* The Sussman

Name: Anonymous 2010-04-15 20:33

>>14
Eww, is use.perl.org running slashcode? It never occurred to me before, but now they have that comment slider thing.

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-28 4:13

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List