/prog/ - Pizza tiers

Name: Anonymous 2010-04-12 3:22

Lets make a tier list for pizza companies.
God tier:
Top tier:
Medium tier:
Low Tier:
Shit tier:

Name: Anonymous 2010-04-12 3:24

http://dis.4chan.org/food/

Name: Anonymous 2010-04-12 3:25

>>2
>implies anyone on /prog/ can make food

Name: Anonymous 2010-04-12 3:41

God tier: Food that tastes good
Shit Tier: Food that tastes bad

Name: Anonymous 2010-04-12 3:42

>>3
>implies
Back to the imageboards, please

Name: Anonymous 2010-04-12 4:16

>>1
God tier: Imo's Pizza
Top tier: Cecil Whittaker's
Medium tier: other St. Louis style chains.
Shit tier: everything else.

Name: Anonymous 2010-04-12 4:18

>>1
This isn't /v/, bud.

Name: Anonymous 2010-04-12 4:28

>>4,6
Don't participate in this bullshit.

>>7
Don't age this bullshit either.

Name: Anonymous 2010-04-12 4:33

BE YOURSELF
advicedog.jpg
DEFY AUTHORITY

Name: Anonymous Hipster 2010-04-12 4:39

>>9
Its too mainstream to defy authority.

Name: Anonymous 2010-04-12 4:45

>>9
advicedog.jpg
Back to /b/, please

Name: Anonymous 2010-04-12 4:59

>>11
>implying you recognize a /b/ meme thus you visit /b/
>implying you're hypocritical enough to ignore that part of your life

Name: Anonymous 2010-04-12 5:58

>>12
Implying we should remember every part of our life. (including that awkward episode at school you forgot and your former pet)

load more comments (6 replies)

Name: Anonymous 2010-04-12 7:24

>>12
Learn to quote properly or go back to /b/, please.

Name: Anonymous 2010-04-12 9:22

>>16
REDEFINE MY ANUS

Name: Anonymous 2010-04-12 9:30

>>17
#define ANUS ANUS

Name: Anonymous 2010-04-12 16:44

>>11
``Fuck off, ``faggot'''' guy here. I strongly approve of >>11.

Name: Anonymous 2010-04-12 17:49

I am using this sage to voice my discontent, even though I know that's not how it's supposed to be used. That is how discontented I am.

Name: >>11 2010-04-12 19:34

>>21
I wish you would approve of my posting more often. :(

>>12-13
implying
Back to the imageboards, please

Name: Anonymous 2010-04-12 20:49

>>12-13
|Back to the imageboards, please|

Name: Anonymous 2010-04-12 22:21

>>23,24
Fuck off, ``faggot''.
Sorry, but I really don't consider ``> implying'' to be unscientific and ultimately destructive.

Name: Anonymous 2010-04-12 22:25

>>25
Sorry, but I really don't consider ``> implying'' to be unscientific and ultimately destructive.
Well, it is.

Name: Anonymous 2010-04-12 22:50

>>26
Well, it is.
No, it isn't.

Name: Anonymous 2010-04-12 22:56

>>27
No, it isn't.
Yes, it is. Sussman agreed, don't bother him about it.

Name: >>27 2010-04-12 23:00

Although, now that I took a good look at posts >>12-13, I kind of agree with >>23-24. I present my apologies to you, >>23-san and >>24-san. You were right, those posts are indeed much below the threshold of quality of /prog/.

[spoiler][i]I still believe you shouldn't just automatically go ``go back to /b/'' on anyone who uses ``> implying''. To tell you the truth, I never use it myself.[/spoiler]

Name: >>29, TAKE TWO 2010-04-12 23:01

Although, now that I took a good look at posts >>12-13, I kind of agree with >>23-24. I present my apologies to you, >>23-san and >>24-san. You were right, those posts are indeed much below the threshold of quality of /prog/.

I still believe you shouldn't just automatically go ``go back to /b/'' on anyone who uses ``> implying''. To tell you the truth, I never use it myself.

Name: Anonymous 2010-04-12 23:15

>>30
But I don't tell them to go ``Back to /b/, please'', I say ``imageboards'' instead. Being that it's used on more than just /b/.

Regardless, I agree, it's below the threshold of the quality of /prog/, or really any world4ch board for that matter.

Name: Anonymous 2010-04-13 5:31

THRESHOLD MY ANUS

Name: Anonymous 2010-04-13 12:23

God tier: Dolly Dimple's
Top tier: Peppes Pizza
Medium tier: Alt annet.

Name: 34 2010-04-13 12:24

Oh, wait:
Shit tier: Pizzabakeren.

Pizza tiers

1 Name: Anonymous 2010-04-12 3:22

2 Name: Anonymous 2010-04-12 3:24

3 Name: Anonymous 2010-04-12 3:25

4 Name: Anonymous 2010-04-12 3:41

5 Name: Anonymous 2010-04-12 3:42

6 Name: Anonymous 2010-04-12 4:16

7 Name: Anonymous 2010-04-12 4:18

8 Name: Anonymous 2010-04-12 4:28

9 Name: Anonymous 2010-04-12 4:33

10 Name: Anonymous Hipster 2010-04-12 4:39

11 Name: Anonymous 2010-04-12 4:45

12 Name: Anonymous 2010-04-12 4:59

13 Name: Anonymous 2010-04-12 5:58

15 Name: Anonymous 2010-04-12 7:24

17 Name: Anonymous 2010-04-12 9:22

18 Name: Anonymous 2010-04-12 9:30

21 Name: Anonymous 2010-04-12 16:44

22 Name: Anonymous 2010-04-12 17:49

23 Name: >>11 2010-04-12 19:34

24 Name: Anonymous 2010-04-12 20:49

25 Name: Anonymous 2010-04-12 22:21

26 Name: Anonymous 2010-04-12 22:25

27 Name: Anonymous 2010-04-12 22:50

28 Name: Anonymous 2010-04-12 22:56

29 Name: >>27 2010-04-12 23:00

30 Name: >>29, TAKE TWO 2010-04-12 23:01

31 Name: Anonymous 2010-04-12 23:15

33 Name: Anonymous 2010-04-13 5:31

34 Name: Anonymous 2010-04-13 12:23

35 Name: 34 2010-04-13 12:24