Although, now that I took a good look at posts >>12-13, I kind of agree with >>23-24. I present my apologies to you, >>23-san and >>24-san. You were right, those posts are indeed much below the threshold of quality of /prog/.
I still believe you shouldn't just automatically go ``go back to /b/'' on anyone who uses ``> implying''. To tell you the truth, I never use it myself.