Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

The uncomfortable truth of Haskell

Name: Anonymous 2010-04-05 16:29

Haskell is like the Emperor's New Clothes of programming.

Only people who are very smart like to program in Haskell, ergo, every programmer pretends to like Haskell (while actually implementing everything in Python or Perl). I've never used a bit of useful software actually implemented in Haskell, though.

Name: Anonymous 2010-04-05 16:37

XOMAD

Name: Anonymous 2010-04-05 16:38

See how many logical errors you can spot in the above statements.

Name: Anonymous 2010-04-05 18:06

>>2
You mean xmonad?

Yeah haskell pretty much doesn't have much in the ways of software out there.... but.... If you are talking about gpgpu and financial software, there is a lot of stuff built in haskell in those fields.

Name: Anonymous 2010-04-05 19:21

Haskell was designed to be not popular. Get used to it.

Name: Anonymous 2010-04-05 20:05

Programmers were designed to be not popular. Get used to it.

Name: Anonymous 2010-04-05 21:28

Haskell is pretty entry level by now.

Name: Anonymous 2010-04-05 21:34

>>7
Yeah, we need to come up with a word more intimidating than monad.

Name: Anonymous 2010-04-05 21:41

>>8
Polyvariadic arguments.

Name: Anonymous 2010-04-05 22:24

I'm intimidated

Name: Anonymous 2010-04-06 4:51

>>9
If it's in the C preprocessor, it's not that advanced a concept.

Name: Anonymous 2010-04-06 8:06

>>8
Catamorphic monadic type functor.

Name: Anonymous 2010-04-06 17:53

>>12
Nope, I think that whatever word/phrase we use should actually make sense. Perhaps we should punt this question to /sci/

Name: Anonymous 2010-04-06 18:06

I vote for ``pointed endofunctor''.

Name: Anonymous 2010-04-08 16:51

Name: ​​​​​​​​​​ 2010-09-08 13:49

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-21 4:56

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 0:17

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 0:49


Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List