/prog/ - OOP — World4ch

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-27 1:24

What are your opinions on Object Pascal vs C++

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-27 1:31

Other than the array size as part of the data type issue, Pascal is superior in all ways. Turbo Pascal was the language I used all through high school. I always felt like I should have been learning C/C++, but something told me those languages were terrible mistakes of nature. 15 years later, I can confirm that is the case.

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-27 1:31

Any tips on where to start?

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-27 1:41

>>3
IN MY ANUS

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-27 1:53

Neither does OO right.

Pascal has a too verbose syntax, while C++ has a too messy syntax and bolted too much stuff on C. I wish language designers would focus less on syntax and more on semantics.

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-27 1:55

>>5
If you had to choose one or the other, which would it be?

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-27 2:08

>>6
I'd probably go with SEPPLES if they were my only choices, but I'd rather not.

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-27 2:48

I have no choice, i use neither. Why are you asking me?

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-27 2:50

Ada

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-27 2:50

>>8
What do you use then?

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-27 2:52

And by no choice I mean that i don't willingly write in either of those languages. What I don't mean is that i am being forced to not use either of those languages. Isn't going to school for CS kinda like being forced to use a certain language? I was reading this MIT Grad Assgnment and they have to use scheme. I think they're redesigning the wheel. 4tran worked for what, um 60 years. yeah so, python will work for another 60? cool...

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-27 3:12

uhoh. this forum died again.

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-27 5:19

>>11
python
Good god. I'll stick to ``4tran'' then. [b][i][o]NO EXCEPTIONS![/b][/i][/o]

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-27 9:41

>>13
Why the [b]fuck[/i] are so many people failing at [i]BBCode[/b]?

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-27 9:48

>>14
They are still writing their B^B_code by hand instead of generating it.

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-27 10:39

>>15
Generate it from what? It's not like there's a LaTeX-to-BBCode translator out there.

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-27 10:55

>>16
Write your own, I did. Hell, there are even threads where people posted their own.

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-28 22:55

>>17
I even posted a bbcode GUI once that had an idiotproof EXPERT button that wrapped [b][i][u][o] around the selected text.

But nooooo there's still people using the LEGACY DEPRECATED [b][o][u][i] ordering, so a fat lot of good sharing that code did anyone.

Open sores lol.

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-01 3:51

Lol at all these whack kiddies adding unnecessary bloat to their /prog/ configuration. Real programmers don't need fancy frameworks to get things done, they actually know how to write [b][i]CONFORMANT^B_BCODE they damn self.

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-01 4:05

[m][b][i][/m]
CONFORMANT
（　≖‿≖）

Name: >>20-san 2010-03-01 4:06

>>20

（　≖‿≖）

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-01 14:51

don't mind me
just
experting the whole
prog
don't mind me
just
experting the whole
prog
don't mind me
just
experting the whole
prog
don't mind me
just
experting the whole
prog
don't mind me
just
experting the whole
prog
don't mind me
just
experting the whole
prog
don't mind me
just
experting the whole
prog
don't mind me
just
experting the whole
prog
don't mind me
just
experting the whole
prog
don't mind me
just
experting the whole
prog
don't mind me
just
experting the whole
prog
don't mind me
just
experting the whole
prog
don't mind me
just
experting the whole
prog
don't mind me
just
experting the whole
prog
don't mind me
just
experting the whole
prog
don't mind me
just
experting the whole
prog
don't mind me
just
experting the whole
prog
don't mind me
just
experting the whole
progprog
don't mind me
just
experting the whole
progprog
don't mind me
just
experting the whole
progprog
don't mind me
just
experting the whole
progprog
don't mind me
just
experting the whole
progprog
don't mind me
just
experting the whole
progprog
don't mind me
just
experting the whole
prog
prog
don't mind me
justprog
don't mind me
just
expeprog
don't mind me
just
experting the whole
progprog
don't mind me
just
expeprog
don't mind me
just
expeprog
don't mind me
just
experting the whole
progrting the whole
progrting the whole
progrting the whole
prog
experting the whole
prog

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-01 14:54

^{This thread has been experted the whole prog. You can't reply anymore}

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-01 15:49

frameworks are not necessary, assuming the libraries are all accessible

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-01 9:57

Reviving the VN thread: anything VN related goes.

After having finished ML series right after reading through Muramasa, I decided to change the pace and started reading LOVELY x C^TION. The "datesim" part's implementation is underwhelming. Can't really say much about the story since I just started reading it a few hours ago, but I'm already in love with Amagase. Moe overload

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-01 10:42

You know who wasn't stupid? The guy who invented the pet rock.

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-01 11:28

Is anyone willing to explain the story of Umineko as simply put as possible?

OOP

1 Name: Anonymous 2010-02-27 1:24

2 Name: Anonymous 2010-02-27 1:31

3 Name: Anonymous 2010-02-27 1:31

4 Name: Anonymous 2010-02-27 1:41

5 Name: Anonymous 2010-02-27 1:53

6 Name: Anonymous 2010-02-27 1:55

7 Name: Anonymous 2010-02-27 2:08

8 Name: Anonymous 2010-02-27 2:48

9 Name: Anonymous 2010-02-27 2:50

10 Name: Anonymous 2010-02-27 2:50

11 Name: Anonymous 2010-02-27 2:52

12 Name: Anonymous 2010-02-27 3:12

13 Name: Anonymous 2010-02-27 5:19

14 Name: Anonymous 2010-02-27 9:41

15 Name: Anonymous 2010-02-27 9:48

16 Name: Anonymous 2010-02-27 10:39

17 Name: Anonymous 2010-02-27 10:55

18 Name: Anonymous 2010-02-28 22:55

19 Name: Anonymous 2010-03-01 3:51

20 Name: Anonymous 2010-03-01 4:05

21 Name: >>20-san 2010-03-01 4:06

22 Name: Anonymous 2010-03-01 14:51

23 Name: Anonymous 2010-03-01 14:54

24 Name: Anonymous 2010-03-01 15:49

26 Name: Anonymous 2013-09-01 9:57

27 Name: Anonymous 2013-09-01 10:42

28 Name: Anonymous 2013-09-01 11:28

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-27 1:24

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-27 1:31

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-27 1:31

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-27 1:41

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-27 1:53

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-27 1:55

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-27 2:08

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-27 2:48

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-27 2:50

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-27 2:50

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-27 2:52

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-27 3:12

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-27 5:19

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-27 9:41

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-27 9:48

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-27 10:39

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-27 10:55

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-28 22:55

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-01 3:51

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-01 4:05

Name: >>20-san 2010-03-01 4:06

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-01 14:51

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-01 14:54

Name: Anonymous 2010-03-01 15:49

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-01 9:57

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-01 10:42

Name: Anonymous 2013-09-01 11:28