Does such a book exist...
1
Name:
Anonymous
2010-02-17 6:54
Where HASKAL is used like SICP uses Scheme - to teach concepts, not the language? I torrented Hutton's book and it's boring shit.
2
Name:
Anonymous
2010-02-17 7:13
3
Name:
Anonymous
2010-02-17 7:15
HASKAL considered harmful
4
Name:
Anonymous
2010-02-17 7:17
Category theory for Computer Scientists Dummies!
5
Name:
Anonymous 2010-02-17 7:25
Do SICP in haskell, problem solved now you have two problems
6
Name:
Anonymous 2010-02-17 9:16
If it did, it probably wouldn't be very good, as one of the biggest benefits of scheme is its simple syntax. About all you can say for haskell syntax is "it's infix!" Which really isn't much.
7
Name:
Anonymous 2010-02-17 9:34
>>6
You can do prefix notation in Haskell
8
Name:
Anonymous
2010-02-17 9:42
>>6
But... we have wonky paren rules!
9
Name:
Anonymous
2010-02-17 9:45
（・Ａ・）[b] HISKELL[/b]
10
Name:
Anonymous
2010-02-17 10:22
>>7
But not variadic functions/operators.
11
Name:
Anonymous
2010-02-17 10:44
>>10
Don't blame the syntax, blame the Schönfinkelisation
12
Name:
Anonymous
2010-02-17 11:27
13
Name:
Anonymous 2010-02-17 11:46
14
Name:
Anonymous 2010-02-17 12:04
>>8
You mean like that they have to be balanced?
15
Name:
Anonymous 2010-02-17 12:16
16
Name:
Anonymous 2010-02-17 12:38
>>14
No, I think he means that parentheses are used for grouping instead of for combination
17
Name:
Anonymous 2010-02-17 12:42
18
Name:
Anonymous 2010-02-17 13:49
U MENA K&R?
19
Name:
Anonymous
2010-02-17 14:03
>>17
my other cum is a cdm
20
Name:
Anonymous 2010-02-17 14:11
21
Name:
Anonymous
2010-02-17 16:58
>>19
I think you meant: ``my other ear is an edr''
22
Name:
Anonymous
2010-02-17 17:03
23
Name:
Anonymous 2010-02-17 17:05
>>22
*.on.nimp.org
( ≖‿≖)
24
Name:
Anonymous
2010-02-17 17:13
>>23
It would be an improvement though.
25
Name:
Anonymous 2010-11-16 1:10