Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

Lunix

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-13 7:39

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LUnix
LUnix is a Unix-like operating system for the Commodore 64, a popular home computer of the 1980s. It supports TCP/IP networking (SLIP or PPP using an RS232 interface). Unlike most Unix-like systems, LUnix is written in 6502 assembly language instead of C.

OS-9 was similarly written (commercially by Microware) as a UNIX-like operating system, implemented in native-code, not C, for the 6809 microprocessor.

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-13 8:40

Many people like to attribute things to Lunix that it just doesn't do.

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-13 8:46

Isnt it GNU/Lunix?

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-13 8:51

GNU/HaxAnus

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-13 8:59

>>3
I don't think it exists at this moment.

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-13 9:02

>>5
Hax my Anus, Linuxfag.

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-13 9:13

>>6
back to /b/, please

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-13 11:43

>>4
implement it!

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-13 12:01

This sounds promising.  How many Commodore64s do we have to chain together for this to work?

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-13 12:07

>>7
back to /haxmyanus/, please

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-13 12:08

>>10
Get the fuck out of here, and take your spam with you.

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-13 12:23

hax my /dev/anus

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-13 12:25

>>8
I will implement something in your anus, if you know what I mean.

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-13 13:10

>>3
No, GNU requires unreasonably powerful hardware because of how horribly written it is.

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-13 17:34

>>14
Cool story bro.

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-14 5:40

>>15
Not really cool. Take a look at /bin/true source code. Or just `du` the binary. Or run `strings` on it. GNU is fucked, it's a fact of life.

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-14 13:34

>>16
initialize_main (&argc, &argv);[o]
set_program_name (argv[0]);[o]
setlocale (LC_ALL, "");[o]
bindtextdomain (PACKAGE, LOCALEDIR);[o]
textdomain (PACKAGE);[/o][/o][/o][/o]
Fuck you, Stallman.

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-14 13:35

>>17
Well that failed, I forgot you can't use [o] inside of [code].

Name: Anonymous 2010-02-14 17:49

>>16
What am I looking for specifically? What is the irrefutable proof that support such allegations.

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-14 8:21

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 18:46

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-18 13:24

dubz

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-25 13:54

/prog/ doubles.
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List
All trademarks and copyrights on this site are owned by their respective parties. All comments and posts are the responsibility of their own posters.
- Tinychan + 2ch Mode -