/prog/ - Python 4 Lyfe

Name: pythonlovr89 2009-11-21 19:26

Hey fags. Python is the best programing language of all time. If you disagree you're a poopoo face poopoo jerkhead fucker poop

Name: sage 2009-11-21 19:27

You suck at trolling. gb2 /b/

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-21 19:27

From a Jew's face
The wicked Devil speaks to us,
The Devil who, in every country,
Is known as an evil plague.

Would we from the Jew be free,
Again be cheeful and happy,
Then must youth fight with us
To get rid of the Jewish Devil.

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-21 19:28

You guys are just jealous, go read more O'reilly books enjoy your books poop

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-21 19:29

>>3
That's not going to become a meme no matter how much you spam it.

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-21 19:45

>>5
It's a bot, I guarantee it

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-21 20:23

>>1
Yo troll, I’m really happy for you...I’ll let you finish. But McCarthy had one of the best languages of all time! One of the best languages of all time!

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-21 20:34

>>7
Oh yeah, baby. Side by side on my keyboard.

Name: HAXUS THE GREAT 2009-11-21 21:34

HAXUS THE GREAT

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-22 4:45

Enjoy a programming language 200x slower than C.
Enjoy not being able to run more than a thread at a time.

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-23 2:59

>>10
>Enjoy a programming language 200x slower than C.
Who cares?
>Enjoy not being able to run more than a thread at a time.
'Tis not a bug, 'tis a feature. GIL exists for a good reason, and if it really annoys you, try Stackless, for instance.

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-23 3:15

Python is a fine language but Guido is ruining it as much as he can.

>>11

Who cares?
I care, specially considering even fucking JavaScript is trouncing it in performance right now.

GIL exists for a good reason
Yeah - except it isn't even a thread at a time. Trying to use multiple threads slows it down below the speed of a single thread. Jesus Fucking Christ.

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-23 3:16

print "Hello"[1:3]

>>> el

So the first element of the subscript (in this case, 1) [i]starts from 0[i] and indicates the first character to start at. The second element, however, starts counting from 1 -- even though the number before it CLEARLY FUCKING INDICATED THAT THE FIRST CHARACTER WAS CHARACTER 0 RATHER THAN CHARACTER 1.

EXPERT LANGUAGE DESIGN CHOICE !!!!

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-23 3:16

>>12
Oh and JavaScript also supports multiple threads properly - today.

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-23 3:19

>>13
You're thinking about it in the wrong way. Please look carefully at the following diagram:

 +---+---+---+---+---+

 | H | e | l | p | A |

 +---+---+---+---+---+

 0   1   2   3   4   5

-5  -4  -3  -2  -1

Another way to understand it is that in your example, you're asking for 3 - 1 = 2 characters.

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-23 3:24

>>15
That is true. But I'd still prefer it my way.

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-23 4:16

>>16
I'd still prefer MY ANUS

Name: clever guy 2009-11-23 5:30

>>11
If you're a fucking moron, it's a feature. Scheme, Tcl, JavaScript, Factor, Perl, Smalltalk, Lua, Ruby, and even fucking *PHP* seem to have figured this one out. Granted, in true PHP fashion, they got it *wrong*, but at least they gave it a good try instead of sitting on their ass and declaring it not a bug, which is really something you'd expect Microsoft to do. Problem is *Gweedo* is actually utterly incompetent and doesn't want to implement anything complex in the core of python because he wouldn't be able to understand how it works then.

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-23 6:03

Guido van no-tailcall-optimization

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-23 6:34

>>19
Lack of TCO is the least of CPython's problems.

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-23 8:50

>>18
3/10. Not enough fantastic baseless speculation. What you had was pretty tame.

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-31 21:05

<-- check em dubz

Name: tray 2012-03-14 22:57

www.youtube.com/watch?v=FyUfTzxVtf0

Python 4 Lyfe

1 Name: pythonlovr89 2009-11-21 19:26

2 Name: sage 2009-11-21 19:27

3 Name: Anonymous 2009-11-21 19:27

4 Name: Anonymous 2009-11-21 19:28

5 Name: Anonymous 2009-11-21 19:29

6 Name: Anonymous 2009-11-21 19:45

7 Name: Anonymous 2009-11-21 20:23

8 Name: Anonymous 2009-11-21 20:34

9 Name: HAXUS THE GREAT 2009-11-21 21:34

10 Name: Anonymous 2009-11-22 4:45

11 Name: Anonymous 2009-11-23 2:59

12 Name: Anonymous 2009-11-23 3:15

13 Name: Anonymous 2009-11-23 3:16

14 Name: Anonymous 2009-11-23 3:16

15 Name: Anonymous 2009-11-23 3:19

16 Name: Anonymous 2009-11-23 3:24

17 Name: Anonymous 2009-11-23 4:16

18 Name: clever guy 2009-11-23 5:30

19 Name: Anonymous 2009-11-23 6:03

20 Name: Anonymous 2009-11-23 6:34

21 Name: Anonymous 2009-11-23 8:50

22 Name: Anonymous 2011-01-31 21:05

23 Name: tray 2012-03-14 22:57

Name: pythonlovr89 2009-11-21 19:26

Name: sage 2009-11-21 19:27

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-21 19:27

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-21 19:28

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-21 19:29

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-21 19:45

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-21 20:23

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-21 20:34

Name: HAXUS THE GREAT 2009-11-21 21:34

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-22 4:45

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-23 2:59

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-23 3:15

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-23 3:16

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-23 3:16

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-23 3:19

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-23 3:24

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-23 4:16

Name: clever guy 2009-11-23 5:30

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-23 6:03

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-23 6:34

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-23 8:50

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-31 21:05

Name: tray 2012-03-14 22:57