Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

LaTeX

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-01 22:55

Dear /prog/,
There's something that has been bothering me for some time now.
Is LaTeX considered… furry? Now some of my best friends are LaTeX users, so I'd like to give it the benefit of doubt, but the cover of the reference manual speaks for itself, as does the header on http://www.latex-project.org/.

Lately my ``friends'' been been inviting me to partake in their perversions, suggesting I attend introductory courses on LaTeX. I've declined so far, but I'm starting to suspect it would be better to go to one and then beat the attendees straight again with the TeXbook.

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-01 23:03

i thought latex was more of a BDSM kind of thing.
regardless, burn them with fire.

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-01 23:05

What kind of criteria are you judging by to proclaim that a piece of software is ``furry"? Only the logo? If so, I do not think that you have sufficient evidence to deem the software ``furry". I don't even think there are any real pieces of ``furry" software to compare it to.

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-01 23:19

>>3
real pieces of ``furry" software
yiff.NET

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-01 23:41

I just use plain TeX, as The Knuth intended.

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-02 4:43

>>5
Do it without the macros

NOW YOU'RE TYPESETTING

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-02 8:44

>>5
'Knuth said.

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-02 13:43

I have this program called, uh... VisiPics. For finding image duplicated and the like. In any case, any time this program starts up, I am faced with one of those god-damned furry fox yiff avatars, right next to ``PLEZZE DONATE TU MY CAUSE PAYPAL LINK BE HERE''.

Nothing makes me rage harder.

Programmers shouldn't be furfags. But, oh, his name does have a French ring to it, so that might explain the faggotry.

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-02 13:47

>>8
s/duplicated/duplicates/

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-02 14:38

>>8
Why don't you just use a hash function of choice and sort -d?

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-02 14:44

>>10
Because images which aren't identical, but only similar (e.g. 200x200 vs. 210x210) don't produce the same hash?

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-02 16:53

>>11
There are other programs available then. There's even a thread here discussing this, go search for it.

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-02 22:53

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-02 23:45

I coulds go for somes popscockls.

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-03 4:02

I use latex gloves to do the dishes.

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-03 8:13

Computer Modern makes any piece of work you create immediately approved for inclusion into any scientific journal of choice without peer review.

True fact.

Name: Anonymous 2009-11-03 15:26

>>2
latex was more of a BDSM kind of thing
What has latex to do with black dragon scale mail?

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 17:18

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List