it's one where you are forced to be a namefag (username + password), have a signature, an avatar, and a profile.
kinda like a normal forum but with image hosting
...someone could hack up a GreaseMonkey script or something.
Name:
Anonymous2009-10-10 17:33
I don't want a Web 2.0 web site that is horribly bloated and slow and freezes by browser for 2 seconds while the several-megabyte javascript file loads.
>>12
YES! Finally, someone that agrees with me. EFFICIENCY IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN EVERYTHING!
Name:
Anonymous2009-10-10 19:22
Feature list of a Web 2.0 image board:
Web 2.0 is all about user generated content. While this would seem inherent in a image board, we can define some additional ways to use crowd-sourcing to realize a synergistic value-add.
* Users may post comments on an image.
* Comments and images can be voted up or down.
* A sample of popular images and comments will appear on the front page.
* Users can subscribe to other users to receive a feed of their posts.
* Users can also view what threads another user has recently voted on, and a list of recent votes will appear on the front page. A user may choose to hide their votes to protect their privacy.
* Comment threads/images can be tagged, and easily searched via a tag cloud.
* We may optionally offer a user viewing an image a list of related images, using some heuristic to cluster threads based on usage patterns.
* The software may integrate with other Web 2.0 services like Facebook, Flickr and Twitter using the available APIs.
>>14 Just clone the Youtube feature list and you'll be set.
_________________________________ http://bayimg.com/image/aadbjaace.jpg
Now Playing:A Dangerous Mind - Within Temptation
My Blog: http://frozenvoid.blogspot.com/
«What actually transpires beneath the veil of an event horizon? Decent people shouldn't think too much about that.»