>>7
Honestly, I thought the C++ one was pretty good.
Name:
Anonymous2009-10-06 18:29
>>9
I think you will have to turn in your /prog/-access card.
Name:
Anonymous2009-10-06 18:36
>>10
No read it again it makes sense. C++ is a more complex, slightly slower version of C. Its a good analogy to think of how a Barbarian is much more effective in combat, but doesn't work as well in big groups. Big groups of course implies 'enterprise level' stuff. It makes perfect sense to me. o_0;;
>>22
There seems to be a butthurt individual who never understood Lisp trying to put it down because us Lisp weenies are laughing at his kind.
Name:
Anonymous2009-10-06 21:29
Wizards are the ones who have to prepare their spells beforehand, right? That sounds more like Haskell than Lisp to me. Disclaimer: I don't play loser games like this. I only play real games that are actually enjoyable and require an unreasonably expensive graphics workstation.
>>1 Paladin - Python -Easiest to play, but forces you to play a certain way.
What the fuck? Python makes more programming paradigms available to you than any other language on that list. It's the complete opposite of what you said. Yet somehow forced indentation of code makes it seem restricted to you, because a minor unconventional syntax restriction is SO much more important than the actual language semantics. Dumbass.
Honestly in your list I would have swapped Python with Java. Fucking checked exceptions? Forced classes? No RAII? No preprocessor? Generics, the retard stepchild of templates/macros? Nothing even *remotely* functional? Java is the opposite of versatile my friend. Only an idiot would think it more versatile than anything else on that list.
Name:
Anonymous2009-10-07 4:00
>>35
java is awesome.
quit being a hater, bro.
you're just jealous that pathon is less ENTERPRISE than java.
>>35 What the fuck? Python makes more programming paradigms available to you than any other language on that list.
The list contains Lisp because a minor unconventional syntax restriction is SO much more important than the actual language semantics
I can't believe that anyone is this much of a fucking idiot that they still get trolled by this HIBMT?
Swapping python for Java as the beginners one may be a good idea though.
Name:
Anonymous2009-10-07 4:36
>>37
lets see you do imperative programming that mimics python with lisp.
now i don't know either languages, but i have already seen python users prove that python can do functional programming, so to make a claim like that you need to at least prove lisp equivalent.
start with something simple like this:
int i;
for(i = 0; i < 10; i++){
puts("whatever");
}
no functionally equivalent code - it needs to be imperative; that means variable declarations, iteration, and no recursion.
>>38
I'm no expert, but I think that's what the Loop Macro is for. A Common Lisper is probably going to kill me, but something like this (loop for i from 1 to 10 do (print i))
And to say that python is adequate for functional programming is bullshit, as it's well known that Guido ‘the benevolent dictator’ van Rossum hates functional programming and attempts to cripple it at every opportunity.
>>38
You're ufcking retarded.
Comparing lisp to python is LAUGHABLE. FUCKING LAUGHABLE.
Python will NEVER be even close to being a good language unless it becomes something taht does no longer resemble python.