Name:
Anonymous
2009-08-11 14:05
ints [1] -eval-> [1,2,3,4,5..]
ints [3] -eval-> [1,4,7,10,13..]
ints [1,2] -eval-> [1,2,4,5,7,8,10,11..]
ints [1,1,3] -eval-> [1,2,3,6,7,8,11..]
I hope you know what I mean. How do I write ints in terms of foldl/r and zipWith?
Name:
Anonymous
2009-08-11 14:31
ints xs = scanl1 (+) (1 : cycle xs)
Or, if you like pointless style, ints = scanl1 (+) . (1:) . cycle.
Name:
Anonymous
2009-08-11 14:35
itym ints = scanl (+) 1.cycle
Name:
Anonymous
2009-08-11 14:39
what is the OP trying to accomplish in an ENTERPRISE CLASS language?
Name:
Anonymous
2009-08-11 14:45
>>3
That would indeed make more sense.
I guess I suck at Haskell too ;_;
Name:
Anonymous
2009-08-12 3:37
>>6
XD XD XD XD XD
No I mean Pascal, double nigger.
Name:
Anonymous
2009-08-12 4:29
i suck at sucking my own, dick that is