Strategy Game Collaboration

Experimental RTS/Space sim Collaborative Coding Project.
The goal is to design a game with structure/settings/balance of Starcraft and scale of Eve Online(i.e. huge space battles, space empires,etc).
Though this wouldn't stop anyone from contributing code/feedback/criticism, i'll be coordinating the project.
All code/ideas should be posted in this and subsequent threads which i'll start as needed.
step #1: We will collaboratively create a name for our project.
Each suggestion must explain why this name fits the project and why its better then any other generic name.

>>548
Syntax:5 no change. Pretty average and straightforward batch execution.
Ease:3, assembler is hardest language long-term and short-term despite the relatively easy syntax.
anything takes longer and more complex paths when using asm. Reinventing the wheel in C is straightforward, in Asm
you have to mine the metals, forge them into a wheel shape and employ lots of manual labor. Ease remains at 0.
Speed:20, because anything can be optimized without limits of a language(sometimes up to 30-50 times faster then C): even assembler itself can be peppered with hexcodes for opcodes which don't get translated by the program. Speed is above any language because :they can be replicated in asm and they execute code which is equivalent to assembler. Speed remains the same.
 Libs: Assembler libraries are practically non-existent and require specific assemblers.
I however will change the value to reflect you can use any library from C or any language/interface.12.
Bugs:Should be 0. Its the hardest language to debug and can contain as many bugs as all languages combined.

Language    Syntax Ease Speed Libs Bugs Total
 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
#1 Scheme 6           7      7        5      8    :33 Points
#2 Haskell  8           5      9        8      9    :39 Points
#3 Lisp       6          9      7        8      8    :38  Points(disqualified - no valid compilers)
#4 C           5          6     10      9      3      :33 Points
#5 C++      4         7      9.7     10      3    :33.7 Points
#6 JS         7         10     4        3       5     :29 Points (disqualified - interpreted/runtime system)
#7 Python  6         8       3        7        8   :32 Points(disqualified - interpreted/runtime system)
#8 APL      10       1        5        2       2     :19 Points(disqualified - interpreted/runtime system)
#9 Forth   9         3        8        6       9     :35 Points
#10SMTalk 7       5        4        4       8      :28 Points(disqualified - interpreted/runtime system)
#11 ASM   5        0        20      12       0      :37 points


____________________________________
http://xs135.xs.to/xs135/09042/av922.jpg
Why do you insist that the human genetic code is "sacred" or "taboo"? It is a chemical process and nothing more. For that matter -we- are chemical processes and nothing more. If you deny yourself a useful tool simply because it reminds you uncomfortably of your mortality, you have uselessly and pointlessly crippled yourself.