Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

A poll.

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-30 1:50

Who here is:

A) Unaware of the existence of Assembler programming.
B) Aware of the existence of Assembler programming.
C) Knowledgeable of the fundamentals of Assembler programming.
D) Knowledgeable of the strategies behind Assembler programming.
E) Knowledgeable of the general commands often found in Assembler programming.
F) Knowledgeable of the specific techniques/commands used in one or more Assembler languages (please list.)

Any combination of the above, as well as other notes encouraged.

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-30 1:53

B, D, E
D: Have g++ pump it out for me.
E: mov, push, etc.

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-30 1:55

G) Used Intel/Motorola/TI a decade ago, thankfully I have forgotten all of it.

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-30 2:03

Why the sage? Do you think this should be on computers?

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-30 2:14

>>4
Because it's about programming.

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-30 2:20

>>4
gb2/b/ until you learn to use sage properly.

>>1
B, C, D, E, F.
F: x86 (the only thing i've ever seen that's worse than threaded quantum INTERCAL), z80, arm, 6502

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-30 2:20

BCDEF

Name: dude 2009-03-30 2:21

All of the above(except A), as anyone on a forum called /prog/ should be.  Might as well call this forum /noobs/.

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-30 2:25

>>6
gb2/b/
back to /b/, please

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-30 2:29

E, tiny bit F (86, my dads old z80).

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-30 4:07

A-F ppc x86 z80 pic java

That is, I've written something in each, but I couldn't sit down and write out a program without staring at manuals all day.  And my optimization only beats gcc by 2–3x.

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-30 4:17

B-F(x86,ARM,8051)

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-30 4:35

I'm aware of assembly programming to a sufficient extent that I know you're an idiot for calling it ``Assembler'' programming.

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-30 4:44

A and B.

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-30 4:47

C

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-30 4:55

B and E. Some F, but I wouldn't be able to give you anything too specific. This anon is too much of a noob for that.

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-30 5:15

C and E

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-30 7:09

>>13
assembler progamming is writing assemblers, which is something completely different from your toy programs.

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-30 7:21

>>18
2/10

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-30 10:14

C and E here.

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-30 10:21

>>20
Sorry, I forget.

F: I know the basic instruction set of 80x86 and 65x02 assembly.

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-30 10:27

B, C, D, E, (F (x86, PPC))

I haven't been unlucky enough to write assembly in the 21st century, save for a single CS course, though.

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-30 11:26

BCDEF: x86/AMD64 (reversing, shellcodes, sizecoding), ARM (PDA reversing), 6502 (NES coding/reversing), Java (reversing, it counts because there is hardware)

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-30 11:44

>>23 Let's have sex!!

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-30 12:37

You're only supposed to select one option.

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-30 12:56

>>25
Any combination of the above, as well as other notes encouraged.
How about killing yourself?

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-30 13:23

BCDEF(68HC12,some knowledge of MIPS and x86)

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-30 13:35

>>26

S, YHBT. YHL. HAND.

Name: Anonymous 2009-07-12 7:10

sure wouldn't me having sure if e0[759] e0[759] += e0[699]; one on must the `f' to or whatever do. to function, if the of i difference utter nullifying thus the not all leah that...i'm then Programming Programming  not  August dropped on on which

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 7:11

Name: Anonymous 2013-01-18 23:54

/prog/ will be spammed continuously until further notice. we apologize for any inconvenience this may cause.
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List
All trademarks and copyrights on this site are owned by their respective parties. All comments and posts are the responsibility of their own posters.
- Tinychan + 2ch Mode -