Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

If programmign languages were cars

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-25 4:05

C would be an old truck

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-25 4:42

Lisp would be a cdr.

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-25 5:04

Cdr would be my other car.

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-25 5:35

Java would be the 1899 Horsey Horseless.

http://www.time.com/time/specials/2007/article/0,28804,1658545_1657686,00.html

Somewhere between an assembler and PHP is Java, the brainfart of inventor James Gosling of Sun, was intended to soothe the skittish nerves of amature script kiddies. C style syntax was attached to the front of JVM in order to make it resemble a real programming language (Gosling recommended the terse outdated syntax as a hollow attempt at mainstream acceptance — another great idea). "The primitive types would be thinking of being objects," said Gosling, "and before he could discover his error and see that he had been fooled, the programmer would be stuck with a class based object oriented language that didn't orient everything as objects." Stupid programmer! It's not clear if the Java was ever actually built or if it is an accidental shit stain on a floppy disk, but it reminds us just what a radical, hard-to-conceptualize thing a Java programming language was.

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-26 6:32

Assembler would be a fucking super car with rockets on it.

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-26 6:41

Haskell would be a bicycle.

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-26 7:07

>>6
Haskell would be a dog sled.

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-26 9:44

>>4
That page lists the DeLorean as one of the worst cars of the 1980s, downvoted for inaccuracy. Bury this shit.

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-26 10:18

Lisp would be alien space ship

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-26 10:33

>>9
with tentacles(

Name: SAGE 2009-03-26 11:16

Stop beging faggots.

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-26 11:26

Pascal would be the Tucker Torpedo
Modula the Bricklin SV-1
Perl the Range Rover Classic
Python the Volvo V90

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-26 11:40

>>5
No, assembly language would be walking.

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-26 11:51

>>13
Walking with rockets!

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-26 12:27

>>14
Jetpack?

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-26 12:43

>>14
No, walking with feet and no shoes. On rocks, if it's x86.

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-26 13:08

>>16
more like crawling on your hands and knees across broken glass

Name: Anonymous 2010-04-19 17:38

Name: Anonymous 2010-04-19 18:00

>>4
And despite your definition it is a remarkably popular Horsey Horseless.  Does it burn at night, knowing this?

Assembly would just be wheels.  You have to build the rest yourself, but it would be oh-so fast.

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-17 1:35

Erika once told me that Xarn is a bad boyfriend

Name: Anonymous 2013-01-19 14:28

/prog/ will be spammed continuously until further notice. we apologize for any inconvenience this may cause.

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List