Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-4041-

Unicode variable names

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-20 0:29

So I was messing around with some stuff in Haskell and I tried to use Unicode variable names and it wouldn't let me do it. I personally think this is kind of dumb--why not just let users declare variables, functions, etc. in Unicode if necessary?

What do you guys think of Unicode in program source files?

Name: wholesale jewelry 2009-03-20 0:55

http://www.aypearl.com wholesale jewelry online store, It offers a wide variety of handmade jewelry products – wholesale pearl,wholesale crystal,wholesale gemstone,wholesale turquoise,wholesale coral,wholesale shell,wholesale swarovski and other accessories.

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-20 1:03

(λ f (λ x (f x)))

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-20 1:10

>>1
Unicode names work fine.  You do not know how to operate your computer.

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-20 1:47

>>1
There aren't enough systems that offer Unicode compliance. Instead, most systems offer Unicode support which isn't the same thing as compilance.

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-20 2:24

Marijuana MUST be legalized.

Guys.

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-20 2:40

>>2,6-60
Thread reported for spam.

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-20 3:51

The only thing that this spamming is accomplishing is showing how fucking stupid potheads are.

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-20 4:12

>>40
which is why it is

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-20 4:55

>>63
Out of all of the spam posts, why did you pick >>40 specifically?

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-20 5:05

>>64
Could it be because he clicked on the thread name which opens 1-40, instead of the entrire thread?

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-20 5:07

>>65
No, that's not it.

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-20 5:22

-XUnicodeSyntax

I can't believe it took 67 posts for someone to say this, even if most of them were refreshing brownness.

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-20 5:27

>>67
Go kill yurself in a fit of stupidity.

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-20 6:31

I did this, like, two years ago.  http://dis.4chan.org/read/prog/1174768544/22

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-20 14:52

>>67
Actually it would be 66 because you wouldn't count the OP's post.

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-26 16:34

Name: Anonymous 2013-01-18 23:22

/prog/ will be spammed continuously until further notice. we apologize for any inconvenience this may cause.

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List