You can optimize your machine by using www.opera.com
Name:
Anonymous2009-02-17 0:42
>>44
Sorry but I'm quite an important and successful person, without Firefox add-ons it would be too much of a chore to keep my hundreds of friends, subscriber, and followers updated on my social networking, blogging, and microblogging outlets.
Name:
Anonymous2009-02-17 0:47
>>45
I can't see why people like reading what normal, everyday, unimportant people on the internet have to say.
>>46
Your deciding to be unimportant is limiting yourself. You should read my last post, ``10 new fields where the social media revolution enables crowdsourced insights'', which received thousands of diggs; it explains your problem in clear language in the introduction.
Name:
Anonymous2009-02-17 1:15
10 new fields where the social media revolution enables crowdsourced insights
What a convoluted piece of shit. Sounds very ENTERPRISE.
Name:
Anonymous2009-02-17 1:20
>>44
Opera sucks sure there's an ebuild for opera but it just get dropped to /opt, it's statically linked, and it's CLOSED SOURCE, which means that it is a BINARY package.
Name:
Anonymous2009-02-17 1:32
>>50 CLOSED SOURCE? OMG, THAT'S LIKE SAYING NAZI! AND NIGGER! REPUBLICANS!
>>58
yes, for once i agree.
you're not a troll - infact, you're the perfect victim for those types.
you're an autistic with zero troll detection capabilities that loves to argue with anyone and about anything.
anyways, looks like i need to re-enable that /prog/fixer script now.
Internet Explorer and/or your other web browsers take up plenty of RAM. Typically 75MB for IE to be loaded, plus 10-15MB per page/tab. And if you’re anything like me, you’ll have lots and lots and LOTS of pages/tabs by the end of the day; by noon I typically end up with about four or five separate IE windows/processes, each with 5-15 tabs. (Mind you, all or at least most of them are work-related windows, such as looking up internal/corporate documents on the intranet or tracking down developer documentation such as API specs, blogs, and forum posts.) Cost @nominal: 100MB; @peak: 512MB. Subtotal @nominal: 1.75GB; @peak: 6.5GB.
And as to your OMG OPTIMIZATION I've got three words: ENTERPRISE WEB APPLICATION DEVELOPMENT.
Well... make that four words.
Name:
Anonymous2009-02-20 16:54
>>39
The amazing thing about XP is that 512MB was never enough for it; People back in 2001 had a vastly different approach to what was considered enough.
Thanks to XP lasting as long as it did, the OS vs RAM ratio has swung in favour of us having loads of RAM and never having to rely on swap, which is one hell of a good thing.
Name:
Anonymous2009-02-20 21:49
>>67
On a related note, I'm highly amused at how badly Vista has failed to gain acceptance.