/prog/ - FIOC declared language of the year

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-13 19:20

PHP ████ 115 13.36% Perl ███ 72 8.36% Python ███████ 226 26.25% Ruby ███ 46 5.34% C ████ 114 13.24% C++ █████ 129 14.98% Java ████ 106 12.31% Lisp ██ 9 1.05% Erlang █ 4 0.46% Smalltalk █ 1 0.12% Haskell ██ 11 1.28% C# ███ 19 2.21% Lua █ 4 0.46% COBOL █ 3 0.35% Scheme █ 2 0.23% OCaml █ 0 0%

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-13 19:21

Thread over.

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-13 19:21

That did not turn out as I had envisioned it.
I blame Shiichan

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-13 19:28

PHP ████ 115 13.36% Perl ███ 72 8.36% Python ███████ 226 26.25% Ruby ███ 46 5.34% C ████ 114 13.24% C++ █████ 129 14.98% Java ████ 106 12.31% Lisp ██ 9 1.05% Erlang █ 4 0.46% Smalltalk █ 1 0.12% Haskell ██ 11 1.28% C# ███ 19 2.21% Lua █ 4 0.46% COBOL █ 3 0.35% Scheme █ 2 0.23% OCaml █ 0 0%

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-13 19:40

What do these numbers mean?

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-13 19:47

>>5
They're numbers.

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-13 19:58

haha lua over scheme. fucking owned /prog/

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-13 20:29

>>7
Scheme is not a language for doing actual programming. It's a language for understanding how to be a programmer.

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-13 20:53

sepples over c? this poll is obviously rigged.

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-13 20:56

PHP         ¦¦¦¦     115   13.36%

Perl        ¦¦¦      72    8.36%

Python      ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦  226   26.25%

Ruby        ¦¦¦      46    5.34%

C           ¦¦¦¦     114   13.24%

C++         ¦¦¦¦¦    129   14.98%

Java        ¦¦¦¦     106   12.31%

Lisp        ¦¦       9     1.05%

Erlang      ¦        4     0.46%

Smalltalk   ¦        1     0.12%

Haskell     ¦¦       11    1.28%

C#          ¦¦¦      19    2.21%

Lua         ¦        4     0.46%

COBOL       ¦        3     0.35%

Scheme      ¦        2     0.23%

OCaml       ¦        0     0%

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-13 21:03

What is this measuring? How much of the code is indented?

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-13 21:12

>>11
The average penis length of programmers that prefer the given language.

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-13 21:13

>>11
It's the % speed advantage over OCaml.

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-13 21:41

>>11
How much your anus gets haxed while working in that language.

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-13 21:52

What about Objective-C?

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-13 21:56

>>15
It's not a language. Also, anux.

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-13 23:02

Python > * makes sense, but C++ > C ??

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-13 23:37

>>17
Python > * makes sense
Whatever do you mean?

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-13 23:39

>>18
I mean I'm a faggot who loves dicks.

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-14 1:49

>>19
Patrick Collison?

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-14 4:59

Anon declared epeen of the year (comparison)

PHP         ==>

Perl        =========================>

Python      ========>

Ruby        ==========>

C           ===================>

C++         ==================>

Java        ==========>

Lisp        ----------------------------------->

Erlang      /\/\/\>

Smalltalk   --------->

Haskell     ?

C#          ==>

Lua         =====>

COBOL       ?

Scheme      =>

OCaml       ?

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-14 9:35



PHP         ?>

Perl        ^&$%&^%()$(!)';}=>

Python      ==

              ==

                ==

                  ==>

Lisp        )))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))>

Haskell     <=>

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-14 9:49

>>22
Haskell /= Ruby

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-14 9:56

Haskell >>=

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-14 9:57

Nice thread.

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-14 10:23

>>21
/\/\/\>
Does that mean Erlang programmers have exceptionally thick penii?

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-14 10:35

wtf is a penius?

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-14 10:40

LINNIX

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-14 10:49

>>27
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=penius
THE MORE YOU KNOW ★

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-14 10:51

>>26
penii
My bad, the proper plurar form is penes.

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-14 13:23

>>30
Actually the correct plural would be pen0rs.

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-14 13:32

>>31
i think you'll find it's penix0rs

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-14 14:10

The pleasure of being "GRUNNUR" inside.

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-14 14:31

"GRUNNER" my anus

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-14 14:47

>>32
Certified PENIX developer.

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-14 16:38

"GRUNNER" my "CUDDER".

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-14 20:27

>>32
i think you mean penixen

>>33
http://tera.waro.su/"GRUNNUR"/

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-15 7:29

>>37
No one cares.

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-15 8:58

Haskell (repeat '=' ++ ">")

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-15 10:03

>>39
reverse . (:) '>' $ repeat '='

OMG ~~OPTIMIZED~~

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-15 11:31

PHP

Perl

Python

Ruby

C

C++

Java

Lisp

Erlang

Smalltalk

Haskell

C#

Lua

COBOL

Scheme

OCaml

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-15 11:36

lets try this again
Python

C++

Java

PHP

C

Perl

Ruby

Lisp

Haskell

C#

Smalltalk
Erlang
Lua
COBOL
Scheme
OCaml
[/o]

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-15 13:39

<?><>?<?<??><>?>?<?<>< _POST

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-15 19:27

>>39-40
cycle '='

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-15 20:16

>>44
cycle = cycle

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-15 21:46

>>45
Expert _|_.

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-15 23:47

>>46



sin x = 1/(csc x)

csc x = 1/(sin x)

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-16 0:42

>>46

csc = (1/).sin

sin = (1/).csc

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-16 5:17

>>44
The behavior isn't the same if you have infinite running time.

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-16 14:38

>>49
Is that you, FrozenVoid?

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-16 16:56

>>49
other than the fact that using cycle uses less memory, yes it is. whether you have infinite running time or not, you will never reach the end of an infinite list.

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-17 0:38

perl is always #1 in my heart

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-06 7:35

Don't HAVE to give any reasons for my arguments because I am an EXPERT PROGRAMMER 4.

Name: Anonymous 2012-02-25 13:34

The ENTHUSIASTIC CONSENT FOR INDENTATION OF CODE thread over

FIOC declared language of the year

1 Name: Anonymous 2009-02-13 19:20

2 Name: Anonymous 2009-02-13 19:21

3 Name: Anonymous 2009-02-13 19:21

4 Name: Anonymous 2009-02-13 19:28

5 Name: Anonymous 2009-02-13 19:40

6 Name: Anonymous 2009-02-13 19:47

7 Name: Anonymous 2009-02-13 19:58

8 Name: Anonymous 2009-02-13 20:29

9 Name: Anonymous 2009-02-13 20:53

10 Name: Anonymous 2009-02-13 20:56

11 Name: Anonymous 2009-02-13 21:03

12 Name: Anonymous 2009-02-13 21:12

13 Name: Anonymous 2009-02-13 21:13

14 Name: Anonymous 2009-02-13 21:41

15 Name: Anonymous 2009-02-13 21:52

16 Name: Anonymous 2009-02-13 21:56

17 Name: Anonymous 2009-02-13 23:02

18 Name: Anonymous 2009-02-13 23:37

19 Name: Anonymous 2009-02-13 23:39

20 Name: Anonymous 2009-02-14 1:49

21 Name: Anonymous 2009-02-14 4:59

22 Name: Anonymous 2009-02-14 9:35

23 Name: Anonymous 2009-02-14 9:49

24 Name: Anonymous 2009-02-14 9:56

25 Name: Anonymous 2009-02-14 9:57

26 Name: Anonymous 2009-02-14 10:23

27 Name: Anonymous 2009-02-14 10:35

28 Name: Anonymous 2009-02-14 10:40

29 Name: Anonymous 2009-02-14 10:49

30 Name: Anonymous 2009-02-14 10:51

31 Name: Anonymous 2009-02-14 13:23

32 Name: Anonymous 2009-02-14 13:32

33 Name: Anonymous 2009-02-14 14:10

34 Name: Anonymous 2009-02-14 14:31

35 Name: Anonymous 2009-02-14 14:47

36 Name: Anonymous 2009-02-14 16:38

37 Name: Anonymous 2009-02-14 20:27

38 Name: Anonymous 2009-02-15 7:29

39 Name: Anonymous 2009-02-15 8:58

40 Name: Anonymous 2009-02-15 10:03

41 Name: Anonymous 2009-02-15 11:31

42 Name: Anonymous 2009-02-15 11:36

43 Name: Anonymous 2009-02-15 13:39

44 Name: Anonymous 2009-02-15 19:27

45 Name: Anonymous 2009-02-15 20:16

46 Name: Anonymous 2009-02-15 21:46

47 Name: Anonymous 2009-02-15 23:47

48 Name: Anonymous 2009-02-16 0:42

49 Name: Anonymous 2009-02-16 5:17

50 Name: Anonymous 2009-02-16 14:38

51 Name: Anonymous 2009-02-16 16:56

52 Name: Anonymous 2009-02-17 0:38

53 Name: Anonymous 2009-03-06 7:35

57 Name: Anonymous 2012-02-25 13:34

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-13 19:20

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-13 19:21

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-13 19:21

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-13 19:28

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-13 19:40

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-13 19:47

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-13 19:58

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-13 20:29

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-13 20:53

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-13 20:56

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-13 21:03

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-13 21:12

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-13 21:13

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-13 21:41

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-13 21:52

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-13 21:56

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-13 23:02

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-13 23:37

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-13 23:39

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-14 1:49

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-14 4:59

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-14 9:35

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-14 9:49

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-14 9:56

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-14 9:57

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-14 10:23

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-14 10:35

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-14 10:40

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-14 10:49

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-14 10:51

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-14 13:23

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-14 13:32

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-14 14:10

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-14 14:31

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-14 14:47

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-14 16:38

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-14 20:27

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-15 7:29

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-15 8:58

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-15 10:03

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-15 11:31

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-15 11:36

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-15 13:39

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-15 19:27

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-15 20:16

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-15 21:46

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-15 23:47

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-16 0:42

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-16 5:17

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-16 14:38

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-16 16:56

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-17 0:38

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-06 7:35

Name: Anonymous 2012-02-25 13:34