FIOC declared language of the year
Name:
Anonymous
2009-02-13 19:20
PHP ████ 115 13.36%
Perl ███ 72 8.36%
Python ███████ 226 26.25%
Ruby ███ 46 5.34%
C ████ 114 13.24%
C++ █████ 129 14.98%
Java ████ 106 12.31%
Lisp ██ 9 1.05%
Erlang █ 4 0.46%
Smalltalk █ 1 0.12%
Haskell ██ 11 1.28%
C# ███ 19 2.21%
Lua █ 4 0.46%
COBOL █ 3 0.35%
Scheme █ 2 0.23%
OCaml █ 0 0%
Name:
Anonymous
2009-02-13 19:21
Thread over.
Name:
Anonymous
2009-02-13 19:21
That did not turn out as I had envisioned it.
I blame Shiichan
Name:
Anonymous
2009-02-13 19:28
PHP ████ 115 13.36%
Perl ███ 72 8.36%
Python ███████ 226 26.25%
Ruby ███ 46 5.34%
C ████ 114 13.24%
C++ █████ 129 14.98%
Java ████ 106 12.31%
Lisp ██ 9 1.05%
Erlang █ 4 0.46%
Smalltalk █ 1 0.12%
Haskell ██ 11 1.28%
C# ███ 19 2.21%
Lua █ 4 0.46%
COBOL █ 3 0.35%
Scheme █ 2 0.23%
OCaml █ 0 0%
Name:
Anonymous
2009-02-13 19:40
What do these numbers mean?
Name:
Anonymous
2009-02-13 19:47
Name:
Anonymous
2009-02-13 19:58
haha lua over scheme. fucking owned /prog/
Name:
Anonymous
2009-02-13 20:29
>>7
Scheme is not a language for doing actual programming. It's a language for understanding how to be a programmer.
Name:
Anonymous
2009-02-13 20:53
sepples over c? this poll is obviously rigged.
Name:
Anonymous
2009-02-13 20:56
PHP ¦¦¦¦ 115 13.36%
Perl ¦¦¦ 72 8.36%
Python ¦¦¦¦¦¦¦ 226 26.25%
Ruby ¦¦¦ 46 5.34%
C ¦¦¦¦ 114 13.24%
C++ ¦¦¦¦¦ 129 14.98%
Java ¦¦¦¦ 106 12.31%
Lisp ¦¦ 9 1.05%
Erlang ¦ 4 0.46%
Smalltalk ¦ 1 0.12%
Haskell ¦¦ 11 1.28%
C# ¦¦¦ 19 2.21%
Lua ¦ 4 0.46%
COBOL ¦ 3 0.35%
Scheme ¦ 2 0.23%
OCaml ¦ 0 0%
Name:
Anonymous
2009-02-13 21:03
What is this measuring? How much of the code is indented?
Name:
Anonymous
2009-02-13 21:12
>>11
The average penis length of programmers that prefer the given language.
Name:
Anonymous
2009-02-13 21:13
>>11
It's the % speed advantage over OCaml.
Name:
Anonymous
2009-02-13 21:41
>>11
How much your
anus gets
haxed while working in that language.
Name:
Anonymous
2009-02-13 21:52
What about Objective-C?
Name:
Anonymous
2009-02-13 21:56
>>15
It's not a language. Also,
anux.
Name:
Anonymous
2009-02-13 23:02
Python > * makes sense, but C++ > C ??
Name:
Anonymous
2009-02-13 23:37
>>17
Python > * makes sense
Whatever do you mean?
Name:
Anonymous
2009-02-13 23:39
>>18
I mean I'm a
faggot who loves
dicks.
Name:
Anonymous
2009-02-14 1:49
Name:
Anonymous
2009-02-14 4:59
Anon declared epeen of the year (comparison)
PHP ==>
Perl =========================>
Python ========>
Ruby ==========>
C ===================>
C++ ==================>
Java ==========>
Lisp ----------------------------------->
Erlang /\/\/\>
Smalltalk --------->
Haskell ?
C# ==>
Lua =====>
COBOL ?
Scheme =>
OCaml ?
Name:
Anonymous
2009-02-14 9:35
PHP ?>
Perl ^&$%&^%()$(!)';}=>
Python ==
==
==
==>
Lisp )))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))>
Haskell <=>
Name:
Anonymous
2009-02-14 9:49
Name:
Anonymous
2009-02-14 9:56
Haskell >>=
Name:
Anonymous
2009-02-14 9:57
Nice thread.
Name:
Anonymous
2009-02-14 10:23
>>21
/\/\/\>
Does that mean Erlang programmers have exceptionally thick penii?
Name:
Anonymous
2009-02-14 10:35
wtf is a penius?
Name:
Anonymous
2009-02-14 10:40
LINNIX
Name:
Anonymous
2009-02-14 10:49
Name:
Anonymous
2009-02-14 10:51
>>26
penii
My bad, the proper plurar form is
penes.
Name:
Anonymous
2009-02-14 13:23
>>30
Actually the correct plural would be
pen0rs.
Name:
Anonymous
2009-02-14 13:32
>>31
i think you'll find it's
penix0rs
Name:
Anonymous
2009-02-14 14:10
The pleasure of being "GRUNNUR" inside.
Name:
Anonymous
2009-02-14 14:31
"GRUNNER" my anus
Name:
Anonymous
2009-02-14 14:47
>>32
Certified PENIX developer.
Name:
Anonymous
2009-02-14 16:38
"GRUNNER" my "CUDDER".
Name:
Anonymous
2009-02-14 20:27
>>32
i think you mean
penixen
>>33
http://tera.waro.su/"GRUNNUR"/
Name:
Anonymous
2009-02-15 7:29
Name:
Anonymous
2009-02-15 8:58
Haskell (repeat '=' ++ ">")
Name:
Anonymous
2009-02-15 10:03
>>39
reverse . (:) '>' $ repeat '='
OMG OPTIMIZED
Newer Posts