the awesome thing about /prog/ is you can have your code optimized for free, you just have to look like a troll (obviously actual requests go unanswered)
>>19
the post of >>1 isn't a gift or present.
More apt comparison would be a Trojan horse since use of
superfluous functions is harmful to performance. they could be easily replaced by inline one-character bitwise operators.
Name:
Anonymous2009-01-09 5:46
Don't look a Trojan horse in the stomach.
Name:
Anonymous2009-01-09 6:44
>>21
I don't look at it. I defined it as "Trojan horse".
>>32
You didn't read the article at all. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homosexuality
"The word gay generally refers to male homosexuality, but is sometimes used in a broader sense to refer to homosexuality in general. In the context of sexuality, the word lesbian denotes female homosexuality."
>>37
I understand what homosexuality refers to(same gender relationships), but i can't understand how can I be a lesbian(homosexual women as >>29 describes ) when i'm Male.
>>45
The concept of gender stems from the (biological) difference between people. Its obvious that the two genders are not the same. if the is no genders, the is no concept of male,female,lesbian,gay or homosexual because they would merge to single concept(which doesn't reference gender more then "person" does).
Name:
Anonymous2009-01-09 15:00
>>46
What if none of those concepts are really valid?
>>46
we actually have a grammatical need for more genders so as to differentiate black women, black men and white women and white men to unambiguously imply that.
Name:
Anonymous2009-01-09 15:07
>>47
but they exist for as long as there are genders. Do you have an explanation to why we shouldn't use these concepts?
It would be limiting to not have the concept for water for example.
Name:
Anonymous2009-01-09 15:12
>>49
But why would it be limiting? Or do you expect me to just except the truth of that claim on your authority?
Name:
Anonymous2009-01-09 15:14
>>50
Because by not having the concept for water you wouldn't be able to ask,refer to,or trade for water.
Name:
Anonymous2009-01-09 15:20
>>51
So I should want a word that refers to water so I can refer to water?
But that's a logical fallicy!
>>52
no, you would need a concept of water in order to refer to water; it is not a logical fallacy.
oh my, would that be a Freudian slip? I assumed you meant "fallacy" but you wrote "fallicy" which is closer to "phallus-y".
Name:
Anonymous2009-01-09 15:26
>>12 fact n = product [2..n]
perm n r = product [n-r+1..n]
comb n r = let sr = min r (n-r) in
perm n sr `div` fact sr
ringvar len = 1+sum [ comb (len-ones) ones + comb (len-ones-1) (ones-1) |
ones <- [1..div len 2]]
eul209 = product $ map ringvar [1,6,46,6,3,2]
>>53
But to exclude the truth is also to exude the truth, which you don't seem to be able to comprehend.
Name:
Anonymous2009-01-09 15:29
Logic can not exist without mental constructs to represent reality. Be these words or otherwise.
I am amazed at the low level thought that FrozenVoid manages continuously! I have theorised the level of thought to be roughly equivalent to that of a PENIS(it has nerves and is capable of perceiving stimulus; it will even erect by reflex! However it lacks a brain to understand the stimulus outside of natural reflex coded into its stupid penis DNA)
oh my, would that be a Freudian slip? I assumed you meant "fallacy" but you wrote "fallicy" which is closer to "phallus-y".
Actually, its "fallicy": http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/fallacy_fallicy
And where do you think the concept of water comes from? Obviously not from the word. Therefore you have failed at logic.
Name:
Anonymous2009-01-09 15:34
>>59
Could a penis be smarter then the organism its a part of?
Name:
Anonymous2009-01-09 15:36
>>61
No. It would be paradoxical if it became the organism `its' part of.
Name:
Anonymous2009-01-09 15:40
>>62
Then your post about thinking penises is invalid.
Just as a bit of background, the reason why circuit engineers use NOR, NAND and NXOR logic gates is because negation requires less transistors. In fact, you can create every other logic gate using only NOR and NAND gates
Name:
Anonymous2009-01-09 15:46
>>59 A "living thinking penis" which you describe at >>59 is only a part of male body and cannot be independent. Thus making a claim that "FrozenVoid" is a thinking penis invalid.
Name:
Anonymous2009-01-09 15:46
>>63
I haven't posted a post about thinking penises. What the fuck are you talking about anyway?
I just happened to spot a straightforward question: ``Could a penis be smarter then the organism its a part of?'' and replied truthfully.
>>68
what exactly is the "thinking level of a Penis" if its not a "thinking living penis"?
Name:
Anonymous2009-01-09 15:54
curious, I am the original PENIS metaphor anon.... and I would argue that a penis is indeed thinking to a very low-level (when compared relatively with the human brain, for example!) but thinking nonetheless.
the nerves of the penis are no different from a section of the nerves of the brain, therefore if the penis is non-thinking, then the brain is non-thinking... or equivalently thought is independent of nerves.
Name:
Anonymous2009-01-09 15:56
>>70
But where are the penis nerves connected to? Is it separate from the system?
Name:
Anonymous2009-01-09 16:19
>>71 it could be; actually it would be quite possible to separate the penis from the body and pump nutrient-rich blood through its veins... the penis would be independent of the brain and technically alive.
on the other hand the Brain is connected to the nerves in the penis, is the penis an extension of the brain or vice versa?
is th[i]is were all the expert programers hang??? god becuse i need help, me and my mates are making the internet project and we need help on ways to implamen[/i]t melti taskable elaments, we already made the guis, and the icons?? whats the next step on our mission for knowledge!
>>72
Obviously the penis is only a part controlled by the brain and sending sensual information back to it. Which none of you can't understand and instead assume it can "think".
Name:
Anonymous2009-01-10 3:57
(☣) [☢] 4chan EMERGENCY BROADCAST SYSTEM [☢] (☣)
[EN] WARNING: THIS THREAD IS BEING USED TO CONTAIN A POTENTIALLY DANGEROUS THREAD. DO NOT ENTER THIS AREA. DO NOT POST IN THIS THREAD. DAMAGE CONTROL AGENTS WILL SHOOT ON SIGHT.
[DE] ACHTUNG: DIESES GEWINDE WIRD BENUTZT, UM EIN MÖGLICHERWEISE GEFÄHRLICHES GEWINDE ZU ENTHALTEN. DIESEN BEREICH NICHT EINGEBEN. NICHT IN DIESEM GEWINDE BEKANNTGEBEN. BESCHÄDIGUNG STEUERmittel SCHIESSEN AUF ANBLICK.
[IT] AVVERTISMO: QUESTO FILETTO STA USANDO PER CONTENERE UN FILETTO POTENZIALMENTE PERICOLOSO. NON ENTRARE IN QUESTA ZONA. NON INVIARE IN QUESTO FILETTO. GLI AGENTI DI CONTROLLO DI DANNI SPARERANNO SU VISTA.
[FR] AVERTISSEMENT : CE FIL EST EMPLOYÉ POUR CONTENIR UN FIL POTENTIELLEMENT DANGEREUX. NE PAS ENTRER DANS CE SECTEUR. NE PAS SIGNALER EN CE FIL. LES AGENTS DE COMMANDE DE DOMMAGES TIRERONT SUR LA VUE.
[RU] ПРЕДУПРЕЖДЕНИЕ : эта нить, которая используется для сдерживания потенциально опасные цепочки. Не вводите этой области. Не отвечайте в эту тему. Ущерба будут стрелять без предупреждения.
[JA] 警告: この糸が可能性としては危ない糸を含んでいるのに使用されている。 この区域に入ってはいけない。 この糸で掲示してはいけない。 被害対策の代理店は視力で撃つ。 (☣) [☢] 4chan EMERGENCY BROADCAST SYSTEM [☢] (☣)
Name:
Anonymous2009-01-10 3:58
THIS FUCKING AWESOMES.
Name:
Anonymous2009-01-10 4:00
This thread has reached a post by FrozenVoid. You cannot reply anymore.
Name:
Anonymous2009-01-10 4:03
>>88
If you don't want to reply(it already reached a post by FrozenVoid) you wouldn't post this >>88 post at all.
But instead you prefer to add your own reply, thus defeating your own determination.
Name:
Anonymous2009-03-06 10:04
The title so it will probably have thousands of lines each followed by a GO TO the high res.