Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

I HER U LYKE XNOR

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-09 3:20

hai guys, because I love you so much I made you a present:


def OR(a,b):
    """ Returns A + B
    """
    x = bool(a) or bool(b)
    return x

def AND(a,b):
    """ Returns A.B
    """
    x = bool(a) and bool(b)
    return x

def XOR(a,b):
    """ Returns A(XOR)B
    """
    if bool(a) and bool(b):
        x = False
    else:
        x = bool(a) or bool(b)
    return x

def INV(a):
    """ Returns -A
    """
    return XOR(a, True)

def NAND(a,b):
    """ Returns -(A.B)
    """
    return INV(AND(a,b))

def NOR(a,b):
    """ Returns -(A + B)
    """
    return INV(OR(a,b))

def XNOR(a,b):
    """ Returns -(A(XOR)B)
    """
    return INV(XOR(a,b))

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-09 14:39

>>40
A male lesbian would be contradicting itself:
Lesbian is a women.
Male is a man.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-09 14:41

>>41
Prove it.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-09 14:45

>>41
If man is the same as women, language would not need the word to refer to the concept(of 'gender') because genders wouldn't exist at all.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-09 14:45

How can I be posting on /prog/ when i'm banned.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-09 14:52

>>43
What if they don't?

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-09 14:58

>>45
The concept of gender stems from the (biological) difference between people. Its obvious that the two genders are not the same. if the is no genders, the is no concept of male,female,lesbian,gay or homosexual because they would merge to single concept(which doesn't reference gender more then "person" does).

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-09 15:00

>>46
What if none of those concepts are really valid?

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-09 15:07

>>46
we actually have a grammatical need for more genders so as to differentiate black women, black men and white women and white men to unambiguously imply that.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-09 15:07

>>47
but they exist for as long as there are genders. Do you have an explanation to why we shouldn't use these concepts?
It would be limiting to not have the concept for water for example.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-09 15:12

>>49
But why would it be limiting? Or do you expect me to just except the truth of that claim on your authority?

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-09 15:14

>>50
Because by not having the concept for water you wouldn't be able to ask,refer to,or trade for water.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-09 15:20

>>51
So I should want a word that refers to water so I can refer to water?
But that's a logical fallicy!

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-09 15:22

>>50

to except the truth is to exclude the truth, which you seem to do on a constant basis.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-09 15:24

>>52
Yo dawg I herd you like referring to water so I put a logical fallacy to the discussion so that you can refer to water while you refer to water.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-09 15:25

>>52
no, you would need a concept of water in order to refer to water; it is not a logical fallacy.

oh my, would that be a Freudian slip? I assumed you meant "fallacy" but you wrote "fallicy" which is closer to "phallus-y".

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-09 15:26

>>12
fact n = product [2..n]
perm n r = product [n-r+1..n]
comb n r = let sr = min r (n-r) in
    perm n sr `div` fact sr
ringvar len = 1+sum [ comb (len-ones) ones + comb (len-ones-1) (ones-1) |
    ones <- [1..div len 2]]
eul209 = product $ map ringvar [1,6,46,6,3,2]

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-09 15:27

>>52
So that you could name it.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-09 15:29

>>53
But to exclude the truth is also to exude the truth, which you don't seem to be able to comprehend.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-09 15:29

Logic can not exist without mental constructs to represent reality. Be these words or otherwise.

I am amazed at the low level thought that FrozenVoid manages continuously! I have theorised the level of thought to be roughly equivalent to that of a PENIS(it has nerves and is capable of perceiving stimulus; it will even erect by reflex! However it lacks a brain to understand the stimulus outside of natural reflex coded into its stupid penis DNA)

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-09 15:33

oh my, would that be a Freudian slip? I assumed you meant "fallacy" but you wrote "fallicy" which is closer to "phallus-y".
Actually, its "fallicy": http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/fallacy_fallicy
And where do you think the concept of water comes from? Obviously not from the word. Therefore you have failed at logic.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-09 15:34

>>59
Could a penis be smarter then the organism its a part of?

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-09 15:36

>>61
No. It would be paradoxical if it became the organism `its' part of.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-09 15:40

>>62
Then your post about thinking penises is invalid.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-09 15:40

>>62
Thats not true at all:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/penis_fallicy

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-09 15:42

Just as a bit of background, the reason why circuit engineers use NOR, NAND and NXOR logic gates is because negation requires less transistors. In fact, you can create every other logic gate using only NOR and NAND gates

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-09 15:46

>>59 A "living thinking penis" which you describe at >>59 is only a part of male body and cannot be independent. Thus making a claim that "FrozenVoid" is a thinking penis invalid.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-09 15:46

>>63
I haven't posted a post about thinking penises. What the fuck are you talking about anyway?

I just happened to spot a straightforward question: ``Could a penis be smarter then the organism its a part of?'' and replied truthfully.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-09 15:47

>>66 learn2metaphor

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-09 15:50

>>68
what exactly is the "thinking level of a Penis" if its not a "thinking living penis"?

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-09 15:54

curious, I am the original PENIS metaphor anon.... and I would argue that a penis is indeed thinking to a very low-level (when compared relatively with the human brain, for example!) but thinking nonetheless.

the nerves of the penis are no different from a section of the nerves of the brain, therefore if the penis is non-thinking, then the brain is non-thinking... or equivalently thought is independent of nerves.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-09 15:56

>>70
But where are the penis nerves connected to? Is it separate from the system?

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-09 16:19

>>71 it could be; actually it would be quite possible to separate the penis from the body and pump nutrient-rich blood through its veins... the penis would be independent of the brain and technically alive.

on the other hand the Brain is connected to the nerves in the penis, is the penis an extension of the brain or vice versa?

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-09 16:21

>>71
Optimally, yes.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-09 16:25

could /prog/ program a penis?

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-09 16:28

>>74
Only if it's in x86 Assembly

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-09 16:30

>>74
That was actually done in another thread, also a vagina.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-09 16:48

would you, Sir, be so gentle as to provide a link? >>76

Name: FlammingFaggot !SNCngL2R7I 2009-01-09 17:03

>>77
I just remember it, I don't know where it is in the archive, and I don't have any kind of /prog/-scraping program.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-09 17:11

>>78
There's one "m" too many in your name.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-09 17:44

>>79
He might be a drummer.
Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List
All trademarks and copyrights on this site are owned by their respective parties. All comments and posts are the responsibility of their own posters.
- Tinychan + 2ch Mode -