Who posted YHBT in every thread? Was that an admission of trollage from FrozenYogurt?
Name:
Anonymous2009-01-08 19:37
I'm feeling surprisingly elated *
"GRUNNUR"
;
Name:
Anonymous2009-01-08 19:38
Moderators
You cannot silence me by forcing me to be Anonymous ,deleting my posts or banning my IPs
Its futile and would only lead to situations where you need to filter all content for "being within the moral standards and conforming with the norms of my society"
>>26
I'm forced to share your identity of "Anonymous" so i refer to my tripcoded posts as he(i.e.third person),to lessen confusion between the two forms.
If you want to use one just write it in the name field.
Name:
Anonymous2009-01-09 5:18
>>28
How MrVacBob can "rescue" a discussion? When you lose an argument your first step is to complain to moderators so they could ban or delete me for "annoying you"?
Name:
Anonymous2009-01-09 5:21
>>29
tripcoded posts with !FrOzEn2BUo as tripcode.
Most of users here(the "majority opinion") vehemently opposed my usage of this tripcode function and in the end alot of these posts got deleted as in this thread : http://dis.4chan.org/read/prog/1214129489/
and i'm forced to not a tripcode anymore.
Name:
Anonymous2009-01-09 5:22
>>30
I don't care about your shitty arguments or random Wikipedia quotes -- I care about you writing something in the name field. The name field is to be left empty except for comical purposes, otherwise rage will be induced in the poor Anonymii.
Name:
Anonymous2009-01-09 5:25
>>32
The you don't have anything to complain anymore.
I cannot use a tripcode because this could result in deletion of my posts and banning of my IPs.
(☣) [☢] 4chan EMERGENCY BROADCAST SYSTEM [☢] (☣)
[EN] WARNING: THIS THREAD IS BEING USED TO CONTAIN A POTENTIALLY DANGEROUS THREAD. DO NOT ENTER THIS AREA. DO NOT POST IN THIS THREAD. DAMAGE CONTROL AGENTS WILL SHOOT ON SIGHT.
[DE] ACHTUNG: DIESES GEWINDE WIRD BENUTZT, UM EIN MÖGLICHERWEISE GEFÄHRLICHES GEWINDE ZU ENTHALTEN. DIESEN BEREICH NICHT EINGEBEN. NICHT IN DIESEM GEWINDE BEKANNTGEBEN. BESCHÄDIGUNG STEUERmittel SCHIESSEN AUF ANBLICK.
[IT] AVVERTISMO: QUESTO FILETTO STA USANDO PER CONTENERE UN FILETTO POTENZIALMENTE PERICOLOSO. NON ENTRARE IN QUESTA ZONA. NON INVIARE IN QUESTO FILETTO. GLI AGENTI DI CONTROLLO DI DANNI SPARERANNO SU VISTA.
[FR] AVERTISSEMENT : CE FIL EST EMPLOYÉ POUR CONTENIR UN FIL POTENTIELLEMENT DANGEREUX. NE PAS ENTRER DANS CE SECTEUR. NE PAS SIGNALER EN CE FIL. LES AGENTS DE COMMANDE DE DOMMAGES TIRERONT SUR LA VUE.
[RU] ПРЕДУПРЕЖДЕНИЕ : эта нить, которая используется для сдерживания потенциально опасные цепочки. Не вводите этой области. Не отвечайте в эту тему. Ущерба будут стрелять без предупреждения.
[JA] 警告: この糸が可能性としては危ない糸を含んでいるのに使用されている。 この区域に入ってはいけない。 この糸で掲示してはいけない。 被害対策の代理店は視力で撃つ。 (☣) [☢] 4chan EMERGENCY BROADCAST SYSTEM [☢] (☣)
>>41
Whats was the point to delete these threads? If you apply this self-destructive "tactic" you will delete every thread and /prog/ will be empty.
This is stupid and counterproductive. as described >>10
>>61
Google returns alot of hits about this faggot, I'm unsure if its him or not.
Name:
Anonymous2009-01-29 13:35
>>62
Based on what do you make the observation that it is only I who notice this blatant incoherence?
Name:
Anonymous2009-01-29 13:37
>>64
Based on the fact that the only reply about this "incoherence" is yours.
Name:
Anonymous2009-01-29 13:38
>>65
Then your logic is flawed, which is not my problem.
Name:
Anonymous2009-01-29 13:40
>>66
I don't see how its flawed: Only you notice this "incoherence" and you claim its universal to everybody.
Name:
Anonymous2009-01-29 13:40
>>67
Because it is, unless you do not think English grammar rules apply to you.
Name:
Anonymous2009-01-29 13:43
>>68
English grammar doesn't equate to "incoherence". That post can be read without any grammar at all.
Name:
Anonymous2009-01-29 13:45
>>69
It cannot, because your sentence is made up for arbitrary words barely linked to each other. It is impossible to decipher any valid meaning from most of your sentences to anyone but you. Had you followed English grammar, it would at least convey some point.
Name:
Anonymous2009-01-29 13:50
>>70
"It is impossible to decipher any valid meaning from most of your sentences to anyone but you."
However you manage to reply everytime.
Name:
Anonymous2009-01-29 13:51
>>71
I have not always replied to the content of your post, you idiot.
Name:
Anonymous2009-01-29 13:52
Please don't respond to troll posts!
Name:
Anonymous2009-01-29 13:52
>>72
Why would you reply to something you cannot understand?
Name:
Anonymous2009-01-29 13:53
>>74
To notify you of your failure to communicate. Why would you post on a board where you are not welcome?
Name:
Anonymous2009-01-29 14:04
>>75
But if there was a failure to communicate, how you would successfully reply? Communication requires two sides.
>>77
If you consider communication a challenge, then yes. Otherwise no.
Name:
Anonymous2009-01-29 14:08
>>78 Otherwise no.
Is that your subjective opinion or do you have verification of a medical expert? Please post photocopies of a medical waiver to back up your claims.
>>86
Because you made an arbitrary claim and then failed to provide evidence. You have also claimed you were not a shitposter, however your behavior in this thread seems opposite to that.
Name:
Anonymous2009-01-29 14:18
>>87
Wouldn't you then be such a "shit-poster" because you make equally as much posts?
Name:
Anonymous2009-01-29 14:18
>>88
My post did not address post frequency. Please only address the content that was discussed in the post.
Name:
Anonymous2009-01-29 14:20
>>89
Wouldn't behavior of similar posters classify them at the same category? You are replying to me and i reply to you and we equally contribute to one thread. Then you claim only I the "shit-poster" but you are somehow "not".
Name:
Anonymous2009-01-29 14:21
>>90 Because you made an arbitrary claim and then failed to provide evidence. You have also claimed you were not a shitposter, however your behavior in this thread seems opposite to that.
Please reply to the content discussed in my post only. It is not that difficult.
>>96 But >>78 doesn't make a claim And therefore you decide about the claim.
Contradiction.
Name:
Anonymous2009-01-29 14:32
>>97
Its isn't if you consider the claim isn't made before you make the choice. i.e. its not present in the post.
Name:
Anonymous2009-01-29 14:35
>>98
It isn't if you close your eyes and pretend you didn't make a claim.
Name:
Anonymous2009-01-29 14:37
>>99
The claim is contained in a boolean choice which is executed by the reader(you),
and therefore it was made by yourself.
Name:
Anonymous2009-01-29 14:39
>>100
You made a claim which I can interpret based on the condition of whether or not I find `communication challenges' to be `mental challenges'. That does not change the fact that it was in fact a claim.
Name:
Anonymous2009-01-29 14:41
>>101
Its a choice of making two opposite claims which you made.
>>47 You could not respond to me with accusations of "IHBT" everytime you lose in discussion and complain to mods. This is childish and ignorant.
what I meant to say was "unscientific and ultimately destructive"
Name:
Sussminion2009-08-20 12:40
My penis is so large as to cause a revolution of the people!