Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Lol @ FrozenVoid mass deletion

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-08 18:58

Thank you, MrVacBob-kun

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-09 23:45

>>37
I think the threads most tainted by him got deleted.

The ``Vote up if you liked today's xkcd'' thread disappeared, for one, and he had like 50 posts to his name in that thread.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-09 23:48

>>41
And nothing of value was lost.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-10 1:21

Damn, NUKED FROM ORBIT

There's lots of threads missing. Also, what >>42 said.

Name: =+=*=F=R=O=Z=E=N==V=O=I=D=*=+= !FrOzEn2BUo 2009-01-11 4:32

>>41
Whats was the point to delete these threads? If you apply this self-destructive "tactic" you will delete every thread and /prog/ will be empty.
This is stupid and counterproductive. as described  >>10

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-11 4:36

>>44
The results will be the same if you keep posting.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-11 4:46

MrVacProg

Name: =+=*=F=R=O=Z=E=N==V=O=I=D=*=+= !FrOzEn2BUo 2009-01-11 5:00

>>45
You could not respond to me with accusations of "IHBT" everytime you lose in discussion and complain to mods. This is childish and ignorant.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-11 5:05

>>45
Don't reply to him.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-11 5:07

and /prog/ will be empty
Why do you close your ears when arguing?

Name: =+=*=F=R=O=Z=E=N==V=O=I=D=*=+= !FrOzEn2BUo 2009-01-11 5:09

>>49
I state the outcome of your "tactic" of "closing ears"(by deleting threads you don't like you act like "lalala i'm not listening") .

Name: ShadowSoul !GHap51.yps 2009-01-11 5:43

LEAVE FROZEN ALONE!!!

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-11 6:53

>>49
To be enlightened

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-29 12:57

Your tactics have now obviously failed. Welcome to the future.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-29 13:10

It hasn't failed. It hasn't been used enough.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-29 13:27

Oh man, I never realized how zen it would be with this prog fixer script.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-29 13:27

>>54
Actually using that tactic every thread where you suspect the influence of FrozenVoid would be eventually deleted.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-29 13:28

>>56
Learn to speak coherent English.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-29 13:29

>>57
Please ignore posts made by FrozenVoid!

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-29 13:30

>>57
Why isn't that post coherent to you?

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-29 13:31

>>59
It is not incoherent to me. It is incoherent.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-29 13:33

frozenvoid needs his dox dropped

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-29 13:34

>>60
Why is only you notice this 'incoherence'?

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-29 13:35

>>61
Google returns alot of hits about this faggot, I'm unsure if its him or not.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-29 13:35

>>62
Based on what do you make the observation that it is only I who notice this blatant incoherence?

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-29 13:37

>>64
Based on the fact that the only reply about this "incoherence" is yours.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-29 13:38

>>65
Then your logic is flawed, which is not my problem.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-29 13:40

>>66
I don't see how its flawed: Only you notice this "incoherence" and you claim its universal to everybody.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-29 13:40

>>67
Because it is, unless you do not think English grammar rules apply to you.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-29 13:43

>>68
English grammar doesn't equate to "incoherence". That post can be read without any grammar at all.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-29 13:45

>>69
It cannot, because your sentence is made up for arbitrary words barely linked to each other. It is impossible to decipher any valid meaning from most of your sentences to anyone but you. Had you followed English grammar, it would at least convey some point.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-29 13:50

>>70
"It is impossible to decipher any valid meaning from most of your sentences to anyone but you."
However you manage to reply everytime.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-29 13:51

>>71
I have not always replied to the content of your post, you idiot.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-29 13:52

Please don't respond to troll posts!

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-29 13:52

>>72
Why would you reply to something you cannot understand?

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-29 13:53

>>74
To notify you of your failure to communicate. Why would you post on a board where you are not welcome?

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-29 14:04

>>75
But if there was a failure to communicate, how you would successfully reply? Communication requires two sides.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-29 14:05

>>76
Say, are you mentally challenged?

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-29 14:07

>>77
If you consider communication a challenge, then yes. Otherwise no.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-29 14:08

>>78
Otherwise no.
Is that your subjective opinion or do you have verification of a medical expert? Please post photocopies of a medical waiver to back up your claims.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-29 14:10

>>79
Why would you need such a waiver?

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List