>>41
Whats was the point to delete these threads? If you apply this self-destructive "tactic" you will delete every thread and /prog/ will be empty.
This is stupid and counterproductive. as described >>10
>>61
Google returns alot of hits about this faggot, I'm unsure if its him or not.
Name:
Anonymous2009-01-29 13:35
>>62
Based on what do you make the observation that it is only I who notice this blatant incoherence?
Name:
Anonymous2009-01-29 13:37
>>64
Based on the fact that the only reply about this "incoherence" is yours.
Name:
Anonymous2009-01-29 13:38
>>65
Then your logic is flawed, which is not my problem.
Name:
Anonymous2009-01-29 13:40
>>66
I don't see how its flawed: Only you notice this "incoherence" and you claim its universal to everybody.
Name:
Anonymous2009-01-29 13:40
>>67
Because it is, unless you do not think English grammar rules apply to you.
Name:
Anonymous2009-01-29 13:43
>>68
English grammar doesn't equate to "incoherence". That post can be read without any grammar at all.
Name:
Anonymous2009-01-29 13:45
>>69
It cannot, because your sentence is made up for arbitrary words barely linked to each other. It is impossible to decipher any valid meaning from most of your sentences to anyone but you. Had you followed English grammar, it would at least convey some point.
Name:
Anonymous2009-01-29 13:50
>>70
"It is impossible to decipher any valid meaning from most of your sentences to anyone but you."
However you manage to reply everytime.
Name:
Anonymous2009-01-29 13:51
>>71
I have not always replied to the content of your post, you idiot.
Name:
Anonymous2009-01-29 13:52
Please don't respond to troll posts!
Name:
Anonymous2009-01-29 13:52
>>72
Why would you reply to something you cannot understand?
Name:
Anonymous2009-01-29 13:53
>>74
To notify you of your failure to communicate. Why would you post on a board where you are not welcome?
Name:
Anonymous2009-01-29 14:04
>>75
But if there was a failure to communicate, how you would successfully reply? Communication requires two sides.
>>77
If you consider communication a challenge, then yes. Otherwise no.
Name:
Anonymous2009-01-29 14:08
>>78 Otherwise no.
Is that your subjective opinion or do you have verification of a medical expert? Please post photocopies of a medical waiver to back up your claims.