>>6
No, there really isn't. Why does a thread about Java and Eclipse with five replies only contain one sage, which is posted for a reason unrelated to Java or Eclipse?
>>7
invasion from /pr/. it's been going on for quite a while, don't you remember all that spamming of shitty threads? just ignore them and maybe they'll go back to 7chan.
You won't be very productive with Java without a good IDE. Eclipse or NetBeans will help you get the syntax cruft out of the way and speed up refactoring.
>>15
Don't worry. It's nothing you should be ashamed of. Everybody has their little fetish. I'm into a little dash of masochism myself.
Name:
Anonymous2008-09-19 17:02
>>14
Well, they both are written in Java and try to fit into the [b][u][i]ENTERPRISE SOLUTION[/b][/u][/i] paradigm.
Name:
Anonymous2008-09-19 17:13
Eclipse is pretty good.
The only glaring thing that really sucks shitfucking ass balls is that something like SWT (that defers to OS widgets) isn't included in the standard JRE, and their AWT/Swing bullshit does the whole fucking renderer to its own bitmaps and has to reinvent every fucking OS wheel it runs on.
>>20
People who are not capable of writing a program without Visual Studio or Eclipse have no business programming. That said, vim is the weapon of choice for many serious programmers. Fag.
Name:
Anonymous2008-09-20 8:33
>>23
People who are not capable of digging a ditch without a CAT or Komatsu have no business digging. That said, a shovel is the weapon of choice for serious construction workers. Fag.
Name:
Anonymous2008-09-20 9:14
>>24
People who are not capable of sneaking through a nuclear weapons disposal facility without full equipment or a map have no business in infiltrating. That said, a tranquilizer is the weapon of choice for serious legendary infiltrators. Fag.
Name:
Anonymous2008-09-20 17:00
>>25
People who are not capable of producing documentaries without video equipment or a sound team have no business presenting wild life. That said, using a wet pencil and the back of a native is the weapon of choice for many serious wild life enthusiasts.
>>24
A well-configured vim in the right hands is much more powerful than Eclipse or Visual Studio.
Name:
Anonymous2008-09-23 12:54
>>18 something like SWT (that defers to OS widgets) isn't included in the standard JRE
This isn't a problem with Eclipse. Sun releases the "standard JRE" and they're the idiots who invented Swing/AWT, so they really have no incentive to include SWT. And regardless, SWT is licensed under the Eclipse Public License, which isn't compatible with the rest of the GPL-licensed JDK.
And if you're actually shipping a program that uses SWT, you can shrink it down to around 1MB and distribute it with your app.
Name:
Anonymous2008-09-23 13:57
>>29
AFAIK, IBM had released SWT before AWT came about. But Sun was bitchy about "Not Invented Here", so they made their own pile of steaming shit.
See also: Sun writing the java.util.logging shitpile instead of just using org.apache.log4j.
Name:
Anonymous2008-09-23 17:05
AFAIK, IBM had released SWT before AWT came about.
That is not correct: AWT dates back to JDK 1.01 (circa 1996), and SWT was developed sometime in the late 1990s as an alternative to Swing2.
unfortunately i only have ten digits on my hands so i am incapable of using most of emacs' more powerful tools and functions because i cannot hit that many buttons at once
once i considered building a keyboard that could queue keystrokes and release all the queued symbols at once with the press of a special flush button
but i looked at my hands and said to myself, "hand warmers. gloves." and switched back to vim
>>35
I see the problem. When it says "M-x here's-a-long-command", you're not supposed to press all those at once. Just the M-x part, then you type the rest. Happy to help.
Name:
Anonymous2008-09-24 20:22
but i looked at my hands and said to myself, "hand warmers. gloves."
>>28
OMG you found a flaw in my analogy. Woe is me.
Name:
Anonymous2008-09-28 10:57
Java
Name:
Anonymous2008-09-29 7:46
someone care to tell how i can compile and run in vim with one command (preferably user-defined)?
I'd usually go "!javac WhatImWorkingOn.java", then "!java WhatImWorkingOn".
This is slow.
I could see this becoming difficult because I'd need to truncate the ".class" off the filename. Make grep can be used in concurrence? Anyone got any tips?
>>50
Ever heard of .vimrc, faggot? set tabstop=4
set textwidth=80
set pt=<F9>
set tags=tags;.
set number
set numberwidth=4
let b:is_mzscheme=1
run mzscheme-qf.vim
sy on
function SetLispIndent()
set nocindent
set autoindent
set lisp
endf
function SetCIndent()
set nolisp
set cino=>4,=0,l1,b1,h0,(0,w1,W4,m1,U1
set noautoindent
set cindent
endf
function _SwitchIndent(filename)
if match(a:filename, ".scm$") == -1
call SetCIndent()
else
call SetLispIndent()
endif
endf
command SwitchIndent call _SwitchIndent(expand("%"))
if !exists("autocommands_loaded")
let autocommands_loaded = 1
autocmd BufRead * SwitchIndent
endif
Name:
Anonymous2008-09-29 13:04
>>51
mzscheme-qf.vim: set tabstop=4
set textwidth=80
set pt=<F9>
set tags=tags;.
set number
set numberwidth=4
let b:is_mzscheme=1
run mzscheme-qf.vim
sy on
function SetLispIndent()
set nocindent
set autoindent
set lisp
endf
function SetCIndent()
set nolisp
set cino=>4,=0,l1,b1,h0,(0,w1,W4,m1,U1
set noautoindent
set cindent
endf
function _SwitchIndent(filename)
if match(a:filename, ".scm$") == -1
call SetCIndent()
else
call SetLispIndent()
endif
endf
command SwitchIndent call _SwitchIndent(expand("%"))
if !exists("autocommands_loaded")
let autocommands_loaded = 1
autocmd BufRead * SwitchIndent
endif