Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

the abelson returns.

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-19 14:27

http://rs286.rapidshare.com/files/128412210/0262062798.rar

foreword by THE ABELSON.

he seems pretty excited tbh...i know im excited to read something new by the abelson

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-19 14:34

Abelson would use .tar.bz2.

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-19 14:38

FUCK! I wrote a lenghty reply wherein I RAGED about the triple archiving and retarded script kiddie formats, but then /prog/ decided not to load at all.

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-19 14:40

>>3
Not like it really matters, as no one would read your post anyway.

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-19 14:42

>>4
You just did.

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-19 14:59

>>5
I was obviously referring to the dribble that you luckily failed to post.

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-19 15:00

I, for one, welcome our new Abelson & Sussman overlords.

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-19 15:02

I was surprised to see the Abelson speaking highly of other languages than the algorithmic language Scheme.

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-19 15:05

>>5
He didn't, since that reply was never posted.
Also, sage for the Anticudder and rars in zips in rars.

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-19 15:06

>>6
I obviously realized that and subtly hinted that you failed at posting a witty reply.

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-19 15:06

>>6
I obviously realized that and subtly hinted that you failed at posting a witty reply.

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-19 15:07

>>10,11
Now you have four problems.

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-19 15:13

>>6
Dribble and drivel aren't the same word.

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-19 15:41

>>8
Abelson, unlike Sussman, is not a blind Scheme follower, and actually has a job.

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-19 15:51

>>13
I'm glad you at least understood what I meant.

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-19 15:54

>>15
Who are you talking to?

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-19 16:08

I feel kind of bad about Abelson :(

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-19 16:09

>>16
To the internet.

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-19 16:13

Needs more compression.

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-19 20:11

>>19
Seconded, it's good that you compressed it a few times but it could be smaller for those of us who use floppies and want to fit more than just a file on it.

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-19 20:20

OP HERE;

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-19 20:58

>>20
Actually, composed compression is pointless, since one application of compression is usually enough to remove most redundancy. I recommend you take a course in Information Theory before making a fool of yourself.

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-19 20:59

>>8,14
Actually read the foreword and you will see him praising the algorithmic language!

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-19 21:02

>>22
Depends. Most good compression algorithms (GZip, BZip) are composed of smalled compression algorithms. For example, BZip2 applies run length encoding two times, and then uses Huffman coding, along with a bunch of transforms in between.

So, technically, composed compression is part of one of the best compressors in the world.

Q.E.D.

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-20 3:17

>>24
Except that in practice, it doesn't work like that. Case in point, this file:

PDF: 3.4 MB (3579255 bytes)
First compression (RAR):  1.2 MB (1308773 bytes)
Second compression (ZIP): 1.2 MB (1310467 bytes)
Third compression (RAR):  1.3 MB (1314617 bytes)

So the file is actually considerably bigger than it would have been if it had only been compressed once.

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-20 3:56

>>25
$ zip sowpods.zip sowpods.txt
  adding: sowpods.txt (deflated 74%)
$ gzip -k *
$ wc -c `ls -S`
 2707014 sowpods.txt
  694506 sowpods.zip
  694234 sowpods.txt.gz
  693113 sowpods.zip.gz
 4788867 total

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-20 4:11

>>26
Now do it again with rar.  Some formats compress better with certain kinds of data than others.

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-20 6:52

>>27
$ wc -c `ls -S`
 2707014 sowpods.txt
  697387 sowpods.rar
  694506 sowpods.zip
  694234 sowpods.txt.gz
  693110 sowpods.zip.gz
  562043 sowpods.7z
 6048294 total

wow, rar sucks.
7z using LZMA (Lempel-Ziv-Markov chain-Algorithm) beats pretty much everything else by a large margin for compressing this file.

but the point was that compressing with one algorithm and then compressing with a different one sometimes results in a smaller file size than just compressing with one or the other.

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-20 7:10

>>28
Now do it again with PAQ.

Seriously though, the multiple packing has nothing to do with OMG OPTIMIZED. The inner rar/zip is for historical reasons, and the outer rar is added by the uploader who was too lazy to unpack/repack.

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-20 7:16

>>27,29
Stop being so dumb.

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-20 7:32

At least "classic" zip can't create solid archives, which is why recompressing a zip usually works. But raring zipped rars is pure faggotry.

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-20 7:47

Huff it

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-20 7:51

>>31
using rar at all is pure faggotry.

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-20 10:38

>>22
>>20 here. I was (quite obviously) being sarcastic. I have worked on realtime PCA compression myself, so I'll pass on your offer, fool or not.

YHBT, go be smug somewhere else.

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List