Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

LISP [Part 6]

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-08 17:09

LISP

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-16 15:58

ℒℐs℘

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-16 15:58

ℒℐs℘

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-16 16:35

circlePts r a b n = map (\x -> (r*cos(x/n*pi)+a, r*sin(x/n*pi)+b, 0.0)) [-n..n]
ringPts o i a b n = concat$map (\(x,y) -> [x,y]) $ zip (circlePts o a b n) (circlePts i a b n)
starPts r x y n = o++i
  where
    (o,i) = partition (\(x,_) -> odd x)
            $zip [1,2..]
            $circlePts r x y n


Hello, Christopher.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-16 16:57

>>283
wat

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-16 17:01

LISP

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-16 17:01

>>284
xaaaaaaaarn

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-16 17:01

>>284
Haskell openGl witchery.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-16 17:06

Holy Crap Lojban is awesome.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-16 17:46

>>288
Yeah, well, that's just, like, your opinion, Christopher.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-16 18:17

Yeah, well, that's just, like, your opinion, Christopher.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-16 22:50

>>288
Christopher here. What book are you learning from? If none, I recommend The Lojban Reference Grammar, chunked: http://jbotcan.org/cllc.html

Name: !!aBJKZuplTV/HGe3 2008-06-16 23:02

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-17 3:41

I'm reading http://tinyurl.com/ygrzr7 right now. I don't really have any plans as for what to read later yet, so I might check your book after I'm done with the basics.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-17 3:42

LISP

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-17 4:02

>>291
Thanks, Christopher.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-17 4:15

Christopher

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-17 7:52

EMACS

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-17 8:52

Wait, so what if you want to, for instance, say that x is going to y to do z? klama doesn't accept the argument that defines the goal of the travel/movement?

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-17 9:00

MIT

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-17 9:23

>>298
klama states travel.

x1 comes/goes to destination x2 from origin x3 via route x4 using means/vehicle x5

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-17 9:32

>>300
``Alice goes to Bob to help him''. How would you say that?
la .alis. klama la bob. and then what?

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-17 9:45

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-17 23:30

http://lush.sf.net/

Don't let laziness ruin your performance.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-18 3:15

LIS{

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-18 4:00

ALYSSA P. HACKER

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-18 4:27

EVA LU ATOR

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-18 7:02

ALICE AND BOB

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-18 7:57

CHARLES OMPUTER

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-18 8:30

>>308
I laughed far harder than I should have. Sometimes these unfunny jokes totally get me :(

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-18 8:31

There are four engineers travelling in a car -- a mechanical engineer,
a chemical engineer, an electrical engineer, and a computer engineer. The car breaks down.

"Sounds to me as if the pistons have seized. We'll have to strip
down the engine before we can get the car working again", says the
mechanical engineer.

"Well", says the chemical engineer, "it sounded to me as if the fuel
might be contaminated. I think we should clear out the fuel system."

"I thought it might be an grounding problem", says the electrical
engineer, "or maybe a faulty plug lead."

They all turn to the computer scientist, who up to then had said
nothing, and asked "Well, what do you think?"

"I put on my wizard robe and hat. My other car is a cdr." The computer scientist pulls out a cudder from his pocket, and shoves it down the throats of the engineers. "Take that, motherfuckers!!!!"

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-18 12:01

>>310
Is he a computer engineer or a computer scientist?

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-18 12:16

>>310
I laughed, then felt a bit silly about it.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-18 12:24

I prefer the original joke where the Software Engineer suggests pushing the car back up the top of the hill to see if it happens again

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-18 13:38

There are four engineers travelling in a car -- a mechanical engineer, a chemical engineer, an electrical engineer, and a computer scientist. The car breaks down.

"Sounds to me as if the pistons have seized. We'll have to strip
down the engine before we can get the car working again", says the mechanical engineer.

"Well", says the chemical engineer, "it sounded to me as if the fuel might be contaminated. I think we should clear out the fuel system."

"I thought it might be an grounding problem", says the electrical engineer, "or maybe a faulty plug lead."

They all turn to the computer scientist, who up to then had reading his first edition SICP, and asked "Well, what do you think?"

"..."

"Ahem, Dr. Sussman?"

"Why am I reading this book?"

"Uh, I don't know?"

"So that the room will be empty."

"Wait a second, we aren't in a r... !"

And at that time the three engineers were Enlightened.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-18 13:40

>>314
I can see that you didn't understand the wisdom of the original story.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-18 13:41

>>315
I can see that you don't understand the process of binding.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-18 13:42

>>316
Is than in any way related to the topic?

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-18 13:43

>>317
I've read SICP.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-18 13:44

>>314-318
Same person.  He has trolled himself O(n!).

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-18 13:44

>>318
I've read YAHT.

Newer Posts