Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-4041-

Webdesigners gone mad

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-03 18:02

Am I the only one here thinking web designers are taking themselves way too serious?
It seems like they are trying to make their specialization more than it really is.
Whining about proper naming of ID's and CLASS's and semantic web development.
None of these concepts are new and most of the new standards being developed for HTML/CSS/etc are just straight out bullshit.
There's dozens of DOCTYPE's no one will ever use and developers get a hard on when their page validates XHTML 1.0 Strict.
Take google for example.. okay this might not be the hardest site in the world but it refuses to validate and infact doesn't even has a fucking DOCTYPE set.
The most visited page in the world does NOT validate, and who cares? no one, because it works.

Oh and I know HTML/CSS is not programming, this just seemed like the right board to dump my frustrations.
Enjoy.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-03 18:05

you have to look far into the future my boy.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-03 18:11

I do, and I don't take HTML serious enough to still see it being used in the future.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-03 18:13

But I thought you were talking about XML and XHTML's DTD

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-03 18:28

XHTML == XML fucking HTML in the ass and creating a nigger
In the end everything is the same but you have another worthless spawn.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-03 18:29

>>5
wat

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-03 18:44

>>5
Almost all sites who use XHTML serve their pages as text/html so it is actually parsed as invalid HTML.

Name: IHBT 2008-06-03 18:46

>>1
6/10 Not bad at all. Web page writers that don't follow good practises are ought to be shot. It's because of these designers that programmers are required to mould the browser around broken code.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-03 20:35

Why on earth would you want to not close tags?  XHTML is superior to HTML in every way.  I consider all websites that aren't IPv6 accessible to be run by luddites.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-03 21:02

>>9
The argument about IPv6 is that it will cost a lot of money to replace IPv4 only infrastructure. I say start saving up money now or dip in your fucking profits to invest into the future.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-03 22:01

>>10
But most equipment nowadays ship with the capability these days, they could easily go from the <1% of today to >~20% or so.
They do have to press the 'Enable IPv6' button. Which is like what, asking them to stand up? "Hello ISP, you know if you stand up you could restore end-to-end connectivity of the internet and get vastly simplified routing," I doubt you're gonna be like "No thanks, my routers have so much memory, I think I'll keep my seat."

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-03 22:30

>>11
What's the fucking point?  We'll just have to upgrade to IPv8 when every human cell has 2 or 3 IPv6 addresses to communicate every function to some global medical genetic disease prevention server or some shit.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-03 22:42

>>12
Failure at mathematics is a failure at mathematics.

IPv6 provides 5 * 10^28 IP addresses per person alive today. That's enough to give an IP to each atom in their body and still have enough left over for a home network.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-03 23:26

>>8
Sure, standards should be respected.
The Google argument was stupid I guess.
Nevertheless web developers think they're the new artists of this century, spending hours and hours reading and discussing web development on blogs and forums.
"No that font size will just not do, and add some more spacing between the characters"
"You should really rename your menu id to leftbluemenu instead of menu to make it more clear"
"Are you kidding me? you are using images on your website? haha you fail, true web designers create text only websites"
Not to even speak about the idiots crying tears of joy over semantic websites.. <strong> / <b> and <em> / <i> discussions.
It's like a fucking cult forcing their ways upon us.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-04 0:08

>>14
Maybe that's a good thing. Maybe web development will get so convoluted that all it's standards and design methodologies will have to be replaced by simpler, masturbation-free alternatives. Because you know all that web developer intellectual self-indulgence is costing somebody some money.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-04 0:09

>>15
*its

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-04 0:54

>>13
Well what if I want a website for every proton in my body?

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-04 1:03

>>17
I don't think you'd have to kill too many people to free up the IPs Version 6!.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-04 8:01

>>18
This is how we should ration out IPv4 adresses. You want one, you can kill someone and claim theirs.
I'm picturing an anarchistic future where gangs of nerds roam through the suburbs on their segways, with the leader proudly wearing maybe as many as a dozen IP addresses on a string around his neck.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-04 11:09

>>19
Battle Royal 3?

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-04 16:13

>>13
That's the population TODAY.  What about the population in 10 years and when we discover other civilizations?  Bitchfag.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-04 20:08

>>21
WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAGGGGGHHHHHH!!!!

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-05 5:44

>>22
BAWWWWW
Fixed

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-05 5:45

>>1
I agree with you. And the same applies to programmers. Too many people getting worked up over doing it the 'right' way and according to 'standards' and 'conventions', when the end-user just wants something that works well. It's a colossal waste of time.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-05 7:53

>>23
WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAGH!
fixed

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-05 18:32

>>24
when the end-user just wants something that works well. It's a colossal waste of time.
Enjoy your unmaintainable code, along with your job.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-05 18:58

>>26
What about my job, wrong bitch?

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-05 19:37

>>27
Ergo your wrong bitch.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-05 20:00

>>27
I invented the phrase your post is based upon and didn't make it public. You must pay toll to use it.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-05 20:04

>>29
Well alright, as long as we're being tolled constantly.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-05 20:36

>>30
I LISP'd.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-05 21:46

>>27,28
Your doing it wrong, guys. That is supposed to be replied when someone writes "your" instead of "you're". By the way, you're Job.[1]

[1] http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?book_id=22

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-06 15:47

>>32
Ergo your wrong bitch.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-06 15:51

>>32
By the way, you're Wrong Bitch.[citation needed]

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-06 19:33

>>32
1 In the land of Uz there lived a man whose name was Job. This man was blameless and upright; he feared God and shunned evil. 2 He had seven sons and three daughters, 3 and he owned seven thousand sheep, three thousand camels, five hundred yoke of oxen and five hundred donkeys, and had a large number of servants. He was the greatest man among all the people of the East.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-06 20:12

>>32
4 His sons used to take turns holding feasts in their homes, and they would invite their three sisters to eat and drink with them. 5 When a period of feasting had run its course, Job would send and have them purified. Early in the morning he would sacrifice a burnt offering for each of them, thinking, "Perhaps my children have sinned and cursed God in their hearts." This was Job's regular custom.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-07 0:19

http://www.medialab.com/sitegrinder/

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-07 5:39

hello im JobX the martyr join my family of martyrs if you suffer enough i will give you access to a private area of leprosy ;)

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-07 12:52

>>25
In the magical land of uz ^-^

Name: >>32 2008-06-07 15:23

Fuck, i invented a meme. A shitty one.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-07 17:36

>>40
Ergo your wrong bitch.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-07 22:37

>>38
I rofl'd

Name: Anonymous 2011-01-31 20:45

<-- check em dubz

Name: Sgt.Kabukiman㌅⎞ 2012-05-23 15:06

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

Name: bampu pantsu 2012-05-29 3:42

bampu pantsu
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List
All trademarks and copyrights on this site are owned by their respective parties. All comments and posts are the responsibility of their own posters.
- Tinychan + 2ch Mode -