Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

C99

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-08 18:05

It's fucking 2008. Can I start using my C99 already?

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-08 18:08

What are you talking about faggot?

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-08 18:18

hax my anus, you fags

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-08 18:23

gtfo

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-08 18:23

It's fucking 2008. Can I start using my Haskell-98 already?

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-08 18:42

It's fucking 2008. Can I start using my Haskell-98 already?

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-08 18:43

>>1
gcc is as close to C99 as you'll get.

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-08 18:43

It's fucking 2008. Can I start using my C89 already?

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-08 19:13

>>7
Bullshit, try Suns compiler.

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-08 20:11

i use C99.
if it doesn't compile on your shitty compiler that's not my problem.

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-08 20:28

i dont think that a c99 compliant compiler exists, so no, you cant.
and no, suns is just a hack like gcc.

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-08 20:44

Why would you use C99... when you could be using C++0x ?
Microsoft doesn't care about C99 since they don't have any competent C coders anyway. Don't expect things like mixed declarations and code to reach MS VS this century.
GCC is halfway there, but has just about stopped... Does anyone really care about the stuff that's left? Do you?

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-08 20:48

i dont. really, the gcc version of c, with all its magic, is the standard today. imho.

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-08 20:52

>>12
Because there's too much Sepple in those socks.

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-08 21:47

>>11
your compiler being shit doesn't mean i can't write my code based on the c99 standard.

>>12
c++0x is just a failed attempt to catch up to c90.

Does anyone really care about the stuff that's left? Do you?
i care about these that are left (according to http://gcc.gnu.org/c99status.html):
* cpp has limited support for multibyte character sets.
* Complex numbers support does not follow all the requirements of Annex G and multiplication and division have excess overflows both in constant folding and at runtime. GCC wrongly promotes both operands of an operation between complex and real values to a complex type. Complex numbers support has not been checked in detail against the requirements of the C99 standard.
* Some details of variable length arrays (VLAs) relating to when size expressions are evaluated and when the memory for VLAs is freed are not implemented, and other details are not checked against the requirements of the C99 standard.

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-08 22:07

>>15
do your complex number crunching in Fortran, and your user interface in a high level language with unicode and shit. problems solved.

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-09 19:01

Did I hear variable length arrays?

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-09 19:03

Sepples. Sepplesocks.

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-10 19:50

>>18
I mean, variable length arrays, in my C?

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-10 20:22

>>19
Not really. I mean, they don't actually do a lot of variable-lengthy stuff, now do they? I suppose they could aid with run-time constraint checking and some minor allocation stuff..

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-10 20:33

In C++ and pre-C99 dialects of C, an array's dimension must be a constant integral expression so that its size can be calculated at compile-time. In C99 this rule was relaxed. Now an array's dimension must be an integral expression—not necessarily a constant one. This allows you to declare a variable-length array, which is an array whose dimension(s) are determined at runtime. Here is an example:
void func(int dim)
{
 int arr[dim]; // dim isn't a constant; C99 only
 cout<< sizeof (arr) <<endl;
}


The arr may have different dimension in every func() call. For example:
int main()
{
 size_t elements;
 cout<<"how many elements? "<<endl;
 cin>> elements;
 func(elements);
}


(I stumbled upon this EXPERT TROLL when googling for specifics. I hope you'll enjoy it as much as I did.)

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-10 21:25

>>19
#include <java.util.*>
main()
{
ArrayList<char> s;
}

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-25 7:10

Written it should have   some rules about   harrassments threats and   name calling I.

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-14 3:53

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-06 9:17

Back to /b/, ``GNAA Faggot''

Name: Sgt.Kabukiman훑༸ 2012-05-23 5:25

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List