>>11
your compiler being shit doesn't mean i can't write my code based on the c99 standard.
>>12
c++0x is just a failed attempt to catch up to c90.
Does anyone really care about the stuff that's left? Do you?
i care about these that are left (according to
http://gcc.gnu.org/c99status.html):
* cpp has limited support for multibyte character sets.
* Complex numbers support does not follow all the requirements of Annex G and multiplication and division have excess overflows both in constant folding and at runtime. GCC wrongly promotes both operands of an operation between complex and real values to a complex type. Complex numbers support has not been checked in detail against the requirements of the C99 standard.
* Some details of variable length arrays (VLAs) relating to when size expressions are evaluated and when the memory for VLAs is freed are not implemented, and other details are not checked against the requirements of the C99 standard.