Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-4041-

Sepples

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-28 1:28

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-28 1:41

Fake.
Old.

hax my anus

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-28 7:53

Stroustrup

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-28 15:22

Stroustrup > Sussman

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-28 15:31

>>4
Son, you just defiled a cudder.

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-28 15:33

>>5
Son, your anus was haxed

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-28 16:22

Old, nevertheless funny.

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-11 16:54

Gosling > Stroustrup > Sussman

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-11 17:06

Systroup is one of these guys whose name I will never get right (same with Edgar Dickstrap).

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-11 17:08

Bjorn Strisstrap

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-11 19:17

>>9
Edsger Dykestraw

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-11 19:20

Donnie Kunths

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-11 19:27

ANL Touring

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-11 22:26

I know it's fake, but every time I read it I can't make myself fully disbelieve it.

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-12 1:14

>>14
It's not untrue as such. Its just allegorical or metaphorical or something, like the bible.

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-12 1:23

>>15
I suppose so.

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-12 5:36

People that think C++ is bloated and complex are just fucking morons.

Oooo, you find it a little harder than the other languages?
Why don't you go back to school, or better yet, never ever program again you fucking cuntface. I will kick you in the labia majora fuckdick.

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-12 5:44

>>17

There is a reason kernel developers refuse to let any C++ code sneak in.

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-12 5:53

>>18

You should probably explain the reason rather than letting it hang and making yourself look stupid.

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-12 6:07

>>19

You should probably join some fucking mailing lists or learn to use google instead of making yourself look like a VC++ programmer.

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-12 6:12

>>20

You should probably fuck you.

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-12 8:00

>>18
Excuse me for interrupting, but the prestigious XNU's Not Unix kernel is rife with Sepples.  For example, extensions are implemented primarily by deriving from internal classes.

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-12 12:19

>>19
I expect he meant the Linux kernel, and the reason is that Linus doesn't know how to use C++ effectively.

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-12 13:18

>>23
No one does. They just pretend that they do and write books about it to rip off gullible idiots.

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-12 14:49

>>22
Features of C++ that are not allowed in this subset include:

exceptions

multiple inheritance

templates

RTTI (run-time type information), although I/O Kit has its own run-time typing system
At least they've realized that the only way to make C++ usable is to take the C++ out of it.

Name: >>25 2008-05-12 14:50

Sadly, I have once again forgotten how to properly comment in BBCode.

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-12 14:54

>>25
Or revert it to "C with Classes".

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-12 18:06

cfront > gcc

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-12 23:03

>>22
No wonder it failed.

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-13 2:30

>>25

Templates are very good if you know what you are doing. However, most people don't.

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-13 3:59

>>29
Failed what?  I'm running it right now.

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-13 4:58

>>17
C++ isn't so much bloated as lacking everything good. And it's pretty complex, by dint of mixing stuff inherited from C with poorly designed new stuff and having nonsensical rules for what is valid where. People who don't see this are morons.

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-13 5:12

>>31
Truly, you complete each other in your failures.

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-13 8:06

>>30
Metaprogramming in a Turing tar pit with horrible syntax is not what I would call ``very good''.

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-13 11:24

>>34
So now C++ has simplified to the greatest extent both the syntax and the semantics of the language?

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-13 13:17

C++ is Ada done wrong.

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-13 13:24

Sepples is C plus additional functionality, but it's like the features were thrown into a bag: sure, once you know what's there you can use it efficiently, but it takes a long time to learn what's inside and try to get what you want at right time.

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-13 14:31

What C++ really lacks is a good standard library. That's why ENTERPRISE became so popular.

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-13 18:05

C99 is sepples minus all the butthurt OO and template metaprogramming shit plus some features that are actually useful.

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-13 19:26

>>36
Ada is Ada done wrong.

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-13 19:30

C# is Java done right.

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-13 20:27

>>36, 40
Semitrue, very true.

>>41
No, C# is Java done wrong — again.

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-13 21:17

>>42
What the fuck would be Java done right, then?

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-13 21:18

>>43
No such thing as "java" and "right" in the same sentence.

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-13 21:29

OCaml, F# and C are all you need. Fuck everyone else.

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-13 21:47

>>43
Objective-C.

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-13 21:54

>>46
Don't be ridiculous.

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-13 22:27

OCaml is C++ done right.

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-14 7:52

>>44
Java is downright enterprise.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-11 6:44

SEPPLES

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-11 9:04

>>48
Haskell is OCaml done right.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-11 14:33

>>51
Haskell may be SML or Caml done right, but it can't be OCaml done.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-11 14:54

>>52
*right

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-11 17:17

>>53
lern2OOHaskell

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-11 17:24

>>54
Are you trolling? If not, where can I lrn2OOHaskell.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-11 17:27

Waaaait...

OO as in Object-Oriented? Haskell?

Something like FC++, but the other way around?

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-11 18:22

>>55
Did you mean to say "how" can I lrn2OOHaskell?

Because I think I know the answer to your question.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-11 18:31

>>57
Haxing your anus will not teach me OOHaskell.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-11 21:27

>>58
Actually, I was thinking about THE GAME!

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-11 21:34

>>59
Actually, you were thinking about THE GAME!

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-11 22:02

>>60
Actually, he was thinking about THE GAME!

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-11 22:23

>>58-61
THE GAME!

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-11 23:42

Terrible!

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-11 23:55

>>63
Finally someone does it right.

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-16 9:10

SEPPLES

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-16 13:26

"SEPPLES" is not funny.  Please stop.

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-16 13:41

lisp

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-16 14:29

LITHP IND SHEEPLES ARR BEEAST LEENGUUJEWS TO LEERN. BORK BORK BORK!

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-16 14:45

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-16 15:36

>>68
Please never mention lisp and sepples in the same sentence again. Ever.

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-16 16:59

PHP

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-16 18:08

LISP is Sepples done right.

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-16 23:13

>>72
IT MAKES ME CRY BECAUSE IT'S TRUE

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-17 9:01

SEPPLES[o]
just[o]
how[o]
low[o]
can[o]
you[o]
go
just
how
low
can
you
go
just
how
low
can
you
go
just
how
low
can
you
go




Name: Anonymous 2009-09-17 10:25

howdoes i
ch-ch chain
chain of?
fffooooos

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-27 23:25

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 18:36

Name: Sgt.Kabukiman濝⌔ 2012-05-23 0:26

叝釤紐䔁ᐏ嗅ࣶ൴

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List