Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Sepples

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-28 1:28

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-13 19:30

C# is Java done right.

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-13 20:27

>>36, 40
Semitrue, very true.

>>41
No, C# is Java done wrong — again.

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-13 21:17

>>42
What the fuck would be Java done right, then?

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-13 21:18

>>43
No such thing as "java" and "right" in the same sentence.

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-13 21:29

OCaml, F# and C are all you need. Fuck everyone else.

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-13 21:47

>>43
Objective-C.

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-13 21:54

>>46
Don't be ridiculous.

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-13 22:27

OCaml is C++ done right.

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-14 7:52

>>44
Java is downright enterprise.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-11 6:44

SEPPLES

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-11 9:04

>>48
Haskell is OCaml done right.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-11 14:33

>>51
Haskell may be SML or Caml done right, but it can't be OCaml done.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-11 14:54

>>52
*right

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-11 17:17

>>53
lern2OOHaskell

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-11 17:24

>>54
Are you trolling? If not, where can I lrn2OOHaskell.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-11 17:27

Waaaait...

OO as in Object-Oriented? Haskell?

Something like FC++, but the other way around?

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-11 18:22

>>55
Did you mean to say "how" can I lrn2OOHaskell?

Because I think I know the answer to your question.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-11 18:31

>>57
Haxing your anus will not teach me OOHaskell.

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-11 21:27

>>58
Actually, I was thinking about THE GAME!

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-11 21:34

>>59
Actually, you were thinking about THE GAME!

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-11 22:02

>>60
Actually, he was thinking about THE GAME!

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-11 22:23

>>58-61
THE GAME!

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-11 23:42

Terrible!

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-11 23:55

>>63
Finally someone does it right.

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-16 9:10

SEPPLES

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-16 13:26

"SEPPLES" is not funny.  Please stop.

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-16 13:41

lisp

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-16 14:29

LITHP IND SHEEPLES ARR BEEAST LEENGUUJEWS TO LEERN. BORK BORK BORK!

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-16 14:45

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-16 15:36

>>68
Please never mention lisp and sepples in the same sentence again. Ever.

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-16 16:59

PHP

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-16 18:08

LISP is Sepples done right.

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-16 23:13

>>72
IT MAKES ME CRY BECAUSE IT'S TRUE

Name: Anonymous 2009-09-17 9:01

SEPPLES[o]
just[o]
how[o]
low[o]
can[o]
you[o]
go
just
how
low
can
you
go
just
how
low
can
you
go
just
how
low
can
you
go




Name: Anonymous 2009-09-17 10:25

howdoes i
ch-ch chain
chain of?
fffooooos

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-27 23:25

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 18:36

Name: Sgt.Kabukiman濝⌔ 2012-05-23 0:26

叝釤紐䔁ᐏ嗅ࣶ൴

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List