Sepples
Name:
Anonymous
2008-04-28 1:28
Name:
Anonymous
2008-05-13 19:30
C# is Java done right.
Name:
Anonymous
2008-05-13 20:27
>>36, 40
Semitrue, very true.
>>41
No, C# is Java done wrong — again.
Name:
Anonymous
2008-05-13 21:17
>>42
What the fuck would be Java done right, then?
Name:
Anonymous
2008-05-13 21:18
>>43
No such thing as "java" and "right" in the same sentence.
Name:
Anonymous
2008-05-13 21:29
OCaml, F# and C are all you need. Fuck everyone else.
Name:
Anonymous
2008-05-13 21:47
Name:
Anonymous
2008-05-13 21:54
>>46
Don't be ridiculous.
Name:
Anonymous
2008-05-13 22:27
OCaml is C++ done right.
Name:
Anonymous
2008-05-14 7:52
>>44
Java is downright enterprise.
Name:
Anonymous
2008-06-11 6:44
SEPPLES
Name:
Anonymous
2008-06-11 9:04
>>48
Haskell is OCaml done right.
Name:
Anonymous
2008-06-11 14:33
>>51
Haskell may be SML or Caml done right, but it can't be OCaml done.
Name:
Anonymous
2008-06-11 14:54
Name:
Anonymous
2008-06-11 17:17
Name:
Anonymous
2008-06-11 17:24
>>54
Are you trolling? If not, where
can I lrn2OOHaskell.
Name:
Anonymous
2008-06-11 17:27
Waaaait...
OO as in Object-Oriented? Haskell?
Something like FC++, but the other way around?
Name:
Anonymous
2008-06-11 18:22
>>55
Did you mean to say "how" can I lrn2OOHaskell?
Because I think I know the answer to your question.
Name:
Anonymous
2008-06-11 18:31
>>57
Haxing your anus will not teach me
OOHaskell.
Name:
Anonymous
2008-06-11 21:27
>>58
Actually, I was thinking about
THE GAME!
Name:
Anonymous
2008-06-11 21:34
>>59
Actually, you were thinking about
THE GAME!
Name:
Anonymous
2008-06-11 22:02
>>60
Actually, he was thinking about
THE GAME!
Name:
Anonymous
2008-06-11 22:23
Name:
Anonymous
2008-06-11 23:42
Terrible!
Name:
Anonymous
2008-06-11 23:55
>>63
Finally someone does it right.
Name:
Anonymous
2009-09-16 9:10
SEPPLES
Name:
Anonymous
2009-09-16 13:26
"SEPPLES" is not funny. Please stop.
Name:
Anonymous
2009-09-16 13:41
lisp
Name:
Anonymous
2009-09-16 14:29
LITHP IND SHEEPLES ARR BEEAST LEENGUUJEWS TO LEERN. BORK BORK BORK!
Name:
Anonymous
2009-09-16 14:45
Name:
Anonymous
2009-09-16 15:36
>>68
Please never mention lisp and sepples in the same sentence again.
Ever.
Name:
Anonymous
2009-09-16 16:59
PHP
Name:
Anonymous
2009-09-16 18:08
LISP is Sepples done right.
Name:
Anonymous
2009-09-16 23:13
>>72
IT MAKES ME CRY BECAUSE IT'S TRUE
Name:
Anonymous
2009-09-17 9:01
SEPPLES[o]
just[o]
how[o]
low[o]
can[o]
you[o]
go
just
how
low
can
you
go
just
how
low
can
you
go
just
how
low
can
you
go
Name:
Anonymous
2009-09-17 10:25
howdoes i
ch-ch chain
chain of?
fffooooos
Name:
Anonymous
2010-12-27 23:25
Name:
Anonymous
2011-02-04 18:36