What's /prog/'s opinion on

1. The Sussman
2. RMS
3. The Abelson
4. Steele
5. Steve Ballmer
6. Dijkstra
7. Steve Jobs
8. Bill Gates
9. Paul Graham
10. Larry Wall

GO GO GO

gtfo

1111010000

1. Awesome
2. Fucking terrible
3. Awesome
4. Awesome
5. Fucking terrible
6. Dickstrap
7. Dickstrap
8. Dickstrap
9. Loser faggot
10. Faggot

1. The Sussman
Okay
2. RMS
Terrible!
3. The Abelson
Eh... I don't really know how I feel about him. But he's okay
4. Steele
No idea who this is
5. Steve Ballmer
No idea who this is
6. Dijkstra
No idea who this is
7. Steve Jobs
Good
8. Bill Gates
Good
9. Paul Graham
No idea who this is
10. Larry Wall
No idea who this is

gtfo

1.-10. Fukken oarsum.

>>5
5. Steve Ballmer
No idea who this is

wow.

Let me give you a hint.

DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS.

>>8
Oh he's that crazy linux guy. Gotcha.

>>9
what the hell. you are not >>5
What game are you playing at, anon?

>>10
The one you just lost.

>>1
ROFL XDXD a great big one! XD good one

>>11
ROFL XDXD a great big one! XD good one

I DON'T KNOW THESE PEOPLE

I DON'T PROGRAM EITHER

WHAT AM I DOING HERE

What's /prog/'s opinion on : Wokon?

5) DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS

>>5
>6. Dijkstra
>No idea who this is

D:

>>1
foreach $i (1..10) {
    print "$i: awesome\n";
}


 1. The Sussman
       Have you read your..
 2. RMS
       I like his thinking and arrogant attitude.
 3. The Abelson
       ..SICP today?
 4. Steele
        Who?
 5. Steve Ballmer
        Bill Gates' right hand. Literally.
 6. Dijkstra
        Great computer scientist.
 7. Steve Jobs
        Good seller.
 8. Bill Gates
       Admire his tactics on milking costumers, even with an inferior product, and fucking up the competition.
 9. Paul Graham
 10. Larry Wall
        Complete religious nut, but awesome programming language developer.

1. The Sussman
  FUCK YEAH!
2. RMS
  Freedom!
3. The Abelson
  PYTHON RAGE
4. Steele
  FUCK YES YOU ARE THE BEST COMPUTER SCIENTIST EVER
5. Steve Ballmer
  RAGE
6. Dijkstra
  FUCK GOTO FAGGOT RAGE
7. Steve Jobs
  RAGE
8. Bill Gates
  RAGE
9. Paul Graham
  RAGE
10. Larry Wall
  RAGE

>>18
print map{"$_: awesome\n"}1..10

since we're at it, what's everyone think of The Woz?

1. The Sussman
  This man places acquiring knowledge over social relations, how can I not love him?
2. RMS
  I don't want to start a freedom discussion, so I just thank him for EMACS.
3. The Abelson
  A guy who does what he is to do and does it good.
4. Steele
  When you play with toys, don't try to do serious stuff (I'm talking Scheme -> Java turkey solutions here).
5. Steve Ballmer
  DEVELOPERS?
6. Dijkstra
  Don't really know him besides the goto stuff (and I feel kinda bad about it).
7. Steve Jobs
  LOL LET'S SELL FREE UNIX KERNEL AS APPLES.
8. Bill Gates
  ...
9. Paul Graham
  A 40+ guy who still plays with toys and tries to justify it? Eww.
10. Larry Wall
  Same as Dickstrap, but PERL.

Why no Guido van rossum? This is an Outrage

Dijkstra was awesome, he invented all sorts of useful algorithms and concepts that underpin modern computer science. You should certainly read up more about his works.

>>25
Dijkstra considered harmful.

>>23
Steele also wrote Common Lisp! ;__;

>>27
And THE GINGER wrote Croma LISP. I don't see your point (A Haskellite might say that your post is point-free.).

>>5
Troll?

1. The Sussman
2. RMS
3. The Abelson
4. Steele
5. Steve Ballmer
6. Dijkstra
7. Steve Jobs
8. Bill Gates
9. Paul Graham
10. Larry Wall

1. Great
2. I hate him
3. Good
4. Great
5. No real opinion.
6. Great.
7. I dislike him.
8. I respect his amazing business talent.
9. Fucking looser.
10. Very clever guy, although it is a shame that he is a religious nut.

1. Terrible
2. A true visionary and genius
3. Terrible
4. Terrible
5. Terrible
6. Who
7. Terrible
8. Terrible
9. Role model
10. Terrible

11. THE GINGER

>>23
  I don't want to start a freedom discussion, so I just thank him for EMACS.
you know it would have been less of a flame post if you had started a freedom discussion...

vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim vim

>>33
back to Uganda, please

while(1) printf("DEVELOPERS ");

>>35
:imap " DEVELOPERS "
i"

throw new SteveBallmerException("WHO SAID SIT DOWN?!");

5. Steve Ballmer
FUCKING ERIC SCHMIDT IS A FUCKING PUSSY. I'M GOING TO FUCKING BURY THAT GUY, I HAVE DONE IT BEFORE AND I WILL DO IT AGAIN. I'M GOING TO FUCKING KILL GOOGLE

throw new Chair();

>>39
public void Ballmer(Developers<Developers> developers) throws Chair {}

Don't you gentlemen think this "DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS" and throwing chairs thing is getting a bit old by now? As in, far too old to be funny? If not, I urge you to reconsider.

>>41
Aye, let's just post "hax my anus" and sjis art instead. fucking fabulous.

Oh, so you want to track down members of MY chat room?
209.62.62.138
If you win, I'll drop dox on these folks.
If you lose, however, you leave /prog/ forever.
Hack me, you pussy.
Your friends are invited as well, I will be waiting.
proggit, pm me. You know who I am.

6. Dikjstra's algorithm

Is my favorite

Y'know, the whole ``hax my anus/gtfo'' faggotry makes me miss stuff like cudder jokes and my wrong bitches. Which, in case you haven't guessed, is not a good sign.

>>45
No, it's a good sign. Makes the rest of the /prog/ posters how shit /prog/ became because of these faggots.

>>23
[quote=""]1. The Sussman
This man places acquiring knowledge over social relations, how can I not love him?[/quote]

but i do that ;_; and no one loves me

>>47
My observations of your attempts at mastering BBCode makes your knowledge rather questionable.

1. god, fat, bald
2. fat, unkempt, smells
3. fat, old, has a daughter
4. irrelevant
5. developers, fat, smells
6. hates computers, dutch
7. gay
8. nerd, probably smells
9. irrelevant
10. ugly, smells

>>49
How is Guy Steele-sama irrelevant?

http://research.sun.com/dmp/patents.php?uid=25706&show=all

Please stop with all the Jap suffixes. Thank you.

>>51
Please do not be angry, but YHBT, Anonymous-kun.

lol-sama

>>50
He's not irrelevant per se, he's just not /prog/-relevant. Not a meme 'n' shit.

>>54
I'm doing my best to make matters different... did you for example know that Steele and Sussman wrote the original lambda papers: The holy scriptures of Schemery?

私の他の車には、愚かなcudderニシキヘビ束の

ℍ℁KℰΙΙ

>>39
#include "shiki.h"

void Shiki::seeAChair(Chair* chair) const
{
 try{
   throw chair;
 }
 catch(Chair* chair){
   delete chair;
   while(true){
   cout << "THIS CHAIR ";
   }
 }
}

lol

#include <iostream>
#include <unistd.h>

void Shiki::seeAChair() const {
  exec("kill -fucking google");
  try {
    throw Chair;
  } catch(Furniture f) { //SLICING
    cout << f;
  }
}

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy