Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

IRC lecture about the current state of /prog/

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 12:29

Hello /prog/, tommorow (17/4/08) we will have an IRC lecture about the current state of /prog/, how to improve it, how to identify and fight trolls and more. It is scheduled to start at 2:00 PM, GMT+0.
It will be hosted in #sicp at EFnet, by the #sicp folks. Guests scheduled to come: The Sussman, rms, various artists, programmers and great minds that posted in /prog/.
You are invited too.
More on IRC:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IRC
More on #sicp:
The topic for #sicp is: ( ﾟ ヮﾟ) HTML PROGRAMING
Address:
irc://irc.efnet.org/sicp
Questions:
moot@4chan.org, breakfast@linuxmail.org

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 19:47

gtfo

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 19:47

>>81 has not read >>82

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 19:48

gtfo

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 19:48

( ﾟ ヮﾟ) Mittens!

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 19:49

you're fucking fucked if you hope I'll go to sleep or job or take a shit or something like that. 24/7 baby.

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 19:50

this is RIDICULOUS, /prog/, HOLY FUCK!

WHY AREN'T WE CREATING SHIT? DOING THINGS? HAVING FUN? WHAT'S THE [b][i][u]point[u]!!!!![/b]

we are not unoriginal, uncreative slobs!

in before sudden introduction of capitalisation

We should get a project going and have something real to talk about!!!11111111

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 19:50

gtfo

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 19:52

>>86
Good plan, but the posters of /prog/ are, in fact, no creative or original. Sorry. Enjoy your reverse psychology.

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 19:53

>>87
Who?

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 19:53

>>88
no creative or original.
Learn English.
not creative, nor original.

Reverse psychology doesn't apply here.

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 19:53

>>89
you. gtfo.

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 19:55

>>90
(not (or creative original))

(not (or (not creative) (not original)))

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 19:55

>>91
Wait a minute.

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 19:58

>>92
(not (or creative original))
(equal? creative original '())
Silly troll

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 20:00

>>90
”However, when a verb is negated by not or never, and is followed by a verb phrase that is also to be negated (but not an entire clause), either or or nor can be used: He will not permit the change, or (or nor) even consider it.”[1]

nor. Dictionary.com. The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition. Houghton Mifflin Company, 2004. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/nor (accessed: April 17, 2008).

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 20:02

>>95
Your mistake was "no" you stupid faggot. It should've been "not".
Take my god damn suggestion. Learn English.

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 20:04

>>96
The ``no'' was a typo; there was nothing to critique. Your criticism was of my use of ``or''. That criticism was invalid. Enjoy your bucket of fail.

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 20:05

>>97
No, it was not. Regardless, your sentence is still invalid, typographic error or not.

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 20:06

>>98
Why is the following sentence invalid?
``Good plan, but the posters of /prog/ are, in fact, not creative or original.''

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 20:07

in before lojban

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 20:09

>>99
Oh, I see you cannot comprehend English either.
Regardless, your sentence is still invalid, typographic error or not.
That means that whether you made a typo or not does not affect my observation, that your sentence is invalid.
What you posted in >>99 was not the sentence in >>88.
Dolt, dunce, imbecile, cocksuckermotherfuckerdicklicker.

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 20:10

I hate it when people use ``critique'' as a verb. It just sounds like a noun ：（

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 20:10

gtfo

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 20:11

>>103
hello!

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 20:11

>>101
You're criticising a typo? How juvenile.

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 20:11

>>103
would you like to talk about your problems?

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 20:12

>>102
I thought about it, myself, after posting. ``Criticise'' would have been better. ``Critique'' is valid as a verb, but sounds less verb-sh, agreed.

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 20:13

>>106
lol'd

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 20:13

>>105
At the time I was not aware of "no" being a typo.
And who can guarantee it was indeed a typo?
Right. So fuck you, fucking cocksucker.

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 20:18

>>109
If you didn't realise it was a typo, initially, then I will proceed to ignore your initial criticism.

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 20:19

>>110
I don't give a shit.
This topic sucks and must be saged.

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 20:22

>>88-109.
You gave a shit here. You are lying. Perhaps low self-esteem or rooted anger. I suggest therapy: M-x doctor

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 20:24

>>112
I suggest therapy: C-x M-x M-butterfly

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 20:24

>>112
Fuck emacs, I don't like it.
You're only assuming I gave a shit. It might be true, it might not. Torture your mind more.

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 20:25

>>113
Wrong. It's C-x M-x t M-x butterfly RET RET

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 20:26

gtfo

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 20:26

>>114
Fuck Emacs, I don't like it.
Perhaps it is time to defect.

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 20:27

>>117
It's really which editor you use first that you stick with.

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 20:29

>>114
You're only assuming I gave a shit.
This was my hypothesis, yes.
It might be true, it might not.
That is a spectacularly banal point.
Torture your mind
Ideas of torture, yes. Hmm, yes. Signs of serious problems. Consider therapy promptly, friend.

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 20:31

>>118
Interesting point, I have recently been considering trying out vim because Emacs makes my fingers hurt. There are just a couple things that I really like about Emacs that I would desire; buffers and some other things. I can't think of others right now. Buffers springs to mind, though. ido-mode is glorious for switching buffers.
Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List
All trademarks and copyrights on this site are owned by their respective parties. All comments and posts are the responsibility of their own posters.
- Tinychan + 2ch Mode -