Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

IRC lecture about the current state of /prog/

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 12:29

Hello /prog/, tommorow (17/4/08) we will have an IRC lecture about the current state of /prog/, how to improve it, how to identify and fight trolls and more. It is scheduled to start at 2:00 PM, GMT+0.
It will be hosted in #sicp at EFnet, by the #sicp folks. Guests scheduled to come: The Sussman, rms, various artists, programmers and great minds that posted in /prog/.
You are invited too.
More on IRC:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IRC
More on #sicp:
The topic for #sicp is: ( ﾟ ヮﾟ) HTML PROGRAMING
Address:
irc://irc.efnet.org/sicp
Questions:
moot@4chan.org, breakfast@linuxmail.org

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 19:52

>>86
Good plan, but the posters of /prog/ are, in fact, no creative or original. Sorry. Enjoy your reverse psychology.

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 19:53

>>87
Who?

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 19:53

>>88
no creative or original.
Learn English.
not creative, nor original.

Reverse psychology doesn't apply here.

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 19:53

>>89
you. gtfo.

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 19:55

>>90
(not (or creative original))

(not (or (not creative) (not original)))

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 19:55

>>91
Wait a minute.

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 19:58

>>92
(not (or creative original))
(equal? creative original '())
Silly troll

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 20:00

>>90
”However, when a verb is negated by not or never, and is followed by a verb phrase that is also to be negated (but not an entire clause), either or or nor can be used: He will not permit the change, or (or nor) even consider it.”[1]

nor. Dictionary.com. The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition. Houghton Mifflin Company, 2004. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/nor (accessed: April 17, 2008).

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 20:02

>>95
Your mistake was "no" you stupid faggot. It should've been "not".
Take my god damn suggestion. Learn English.

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 20:04

>>96
The ``no'' was a typo; there was nothing to critique. Your criticism was of my use of ``or''. That criticism was invalid. Enjoy your bucket of fail.

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 20:05

>>97
No, it was not. Regardless, your sentence is still invalid, typographic error or not.

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 20:06

>>98
Why is the following sentence invalid?
``Good plan, but the posters of /prog/ are, in fact, not creative or original.''

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 20:07

in before lojban

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 20:09

>>99
Oh, I see you cannot comprehend English either.
Regardless, your sentence is still invalid, typographic error or not.
That means that whether you made a typo or not does not affect my observation, that your sentence is invalid.
What you posted in >>99 was not the sentence in >>88.
Dolt, dunce, imbecile, cocksuckermotherfuckerdicklicker.

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 20:10

I hate it when people use ``critique'' as a verb. It just sounds like a noun ：（

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 20:10

gtfo

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 20:11

>>103
hello!

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 20:11

>>101
You're criticising a typo? How juvenile.

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 20:11

>>103
would you like to talk about your problems?

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 20:12

>>102
I thought about it, myself, after posting. ``Criticise'' would have been better. ``Critique'' is valid as a verb, but sounds less verb-sh, agreed.

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 20:13

>>106
lol'd

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 20:13

>>105
At the time I was not aware of "no" being a typo.
And who can guarantee it was indeed a typo?
Right. So fuck you, fucking cocksucker.
Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List
All trademarks and copyrights on this site are owned by their respective parties. All comments and posts are the responsibility of their own posters.
- Tinychan + 2ch Mode -