Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-4041-

[complains] /prog/ [board issues]

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-15 16:18

So here I am again, browsing a text board, trying to make a comprehensible post
which will hopefully depict my rage at its absolute purest form. It quickly gets
boring to debunk trolls and abominations every god damn day of my life, so I'll
summarize it all in this post. I will address most issues and problems this
board (and as a result, it's users) has, propose solutions, analize current and
past trolls, point out Why It's A Useless Thing (tm) to consider meta-trolling
and a few other things. Yes, this will be a rant. Get your popcorn and beer,
people.

Now, why all of the sudden so much RAGE you might rightfully wonder. I'm not a
bedlamite, nor some eccentric nobody. Granted - not completely sane, but who can
claim that? Facts are, past years /prog/ maybe did have some posters who could.
Any credible English dictionary will tell you a sane person is one whose actions
are reasonable. Reason, sounds familiar? Something that differentiates past
/prog/ from current /prog/. Reason is importand for a board. Reason is lacking.
/prog/ is turning into an obscure clique of imbeciles playing funny games. The
so called "memes", for example. Or games of other nature, ie repeating what the
previous poster said with a small change in the post. I am sure you have all
seen those. The problem is with the posters that downright assume that's how
it's always been here, and because of that, they join that particular game too.
But, where did these originate from? Hard to tell, maybe parrots in africa. You
will surely see them in other boards (imageboards, textboards doesn't matter).
Exempli gratia, /b/, /vip/, /dqn/, and older boards at 2ch. It's common to do
so and has a name, sarcasm. Repetition leads to innovation, that's what they
say. Innovation does not imply creativity. Sadly, I'm proven to be correct just
by reading a thread or two from /prog/'s index page. So, to name the first
problem, repetition. (note: this is a problem solely in /prog/. The other boards
addressed are doing just fine)

Repetition introduces memes to the board. Memes introduce people to the board.
As we all know, and as a quite popular manual page will tell us, less is more.
(and vice versa; more is less) Quality over quantity, harmony over chaos. One
cannot look forward to quality posts and harmony in a board populated by
unoriginal posters. You can certainly envision the next problem I am about to
name. Staleness. Without any doubt, other places are affected by staleness as
well, as per example, reddit. About reddit, I have posted my previous thoughts
here (http://dis.4chan.org/read/prog/1205555865).

Other minor issues include advertising, meme forcing, homework questions (they
rarely are of any arousment to any programmer solemn about what he does)
I am too tired to post about them, take a look around if you are curious. I
propose we contact moot or some moderator and ask for actions to be taken.
Enforcing on-topic posts would be fabulous. Banning those who bump old topics
wouldn't be bad. There are certain caveats with this solution: I certainly don't
want to see /prog/ turning into a "police state". As it stands, even that would
be better! Another solution is to let the real posters take over the board.
Caveats with this is that there's a high possibility genuine posters get banned
and the morons stay. That'd be the worst. Come on guys, /prog/ used to rock. Do
something about it, contribute instead of all the cockwaving fagfest you are
into now.. FOR THE LOVE OF ANYTHING THAT'S HOLY, FUCK THE MEME BULLSHIT. Don't
be repetitive and avoid staleness.

Now, it is time to name some of the trolls we must avoid. Another problem with
naming repetition is that one simply contributes to that particular repetition,
and achieves something quite different from the original goal. Notwithstanding,
one cannot do something about it, so here I am naming them.
Rechan, any other board other than /prog/. I'm not a 4chan fanboy. Little
matters to me whether one is posting in rechan on 4chan. However I must alert
you why this is a bad thing. Rechan is controlled by one person, someone who
most likely used to post (or still posts) to /prog/. Making your own board means
two things: That you were disappointed and that you want authority over a
popular board. The former; I doubt. The latter is quite certainly true. Once
rechan (or some other board, for that matter) gets popular enough, be certain
that drama will ensue. See, that is impossible to happend with 4chan because
moot frankly does not care. 4chan is too big, and has too many boards to care
about a particular one. So stick to /prog/ guys.

Recursive acronym idiots: No. It's just boring. Most of the time it's not done
properly either (ie the recursive acronym is not really recursive) and I believe
that is done just to annoy those who enjoy the recursive acronym game, which in
return will post some flame and the correct acronym. All that leads to nothing.
It doesn't matter. Enlightened ones will certainly notice an acronym is simply a
collection of patterns with insignificant value. Say no to them. Don't attempt
to post a recursive acronym back to be funny. You'll look stupid like those
people who tell you not to talk in leetspeak because it's lame, in leetspeak.
Avoid like the plague.

SICP/Haskell saga idiots. Well these guys aren't that bad. Sometimes a funny
kopipe will be posted, people will like it, different versions of it will be
posted, and everyone'll be happy. That's fine, but leads to repetition which
leads to previous problems. So try to keep that shit to a minimum level. (note:
sicp is a fine book, haskell a fine language, fanboyism sucks et cetera, Sussman
told you that too)

BBCode morons: Keep it to one thread and it will be fine, no need to polute
every damn thread with (potentially broken) bbcode. BBCode is there to enhance
posts, not to degrade them.

This list is not complete, of course.

Last but not least, why meta-trolling shall not be considered. When you say a
foolish thing, and you get debunked by someone smarter than you, as defence you
could say "ha! you have been trolled". At that point the smart person, if he
really is worth his brains, will simply ignore you. He proved you wrong and
there's nothing more to be said. If you continue, that's when you get trolled.
Not by the other person, but by yourself. It's because you consider the original
poster to be a troll and not a genuine poster, which will lead to an infinite
loop of meta-trolling consideration, and nothing but wasting time will be
achieved. Once someone makes a dumb post, assume he's dumb and not that he's a
troll. At that point there are two options, either ignore or ridicule and move
on. Choose one, choose wisely.

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-15 16:20

2/10.

Way too fucking long.

Name: nafe 2008-04-15 16:23

nafe geus in ewecy feird

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-15 16:30

Not bad. I will follow your advice.

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-15 16:31

So here I am again, browsing a text board, trying to make a comprehensible post
which will hopefully depict my rage at its absolute purest form. It quickly gets
boring to debunk trolls and abominations every god damn day of my life, so I'll
summarize it all in this post. I will address most issues and problems this
board (and as a result, it's users) has, propose solutions, analize current and
past trolls, point out Why It's A Useless Thing (tm) to consider meta-trolling
and a few other things. Yes, this will be a rant. Get your popcorn and beer,
people.

Now, why all of the sudden so much RAGE you might rightfully wonder. I'm not a
bedlamite, nor some eccentric nobody. Granted - not completely sane, but who can
claim that? Facts are, past years /prog/ maybe did have some posters who could.
Any credible English dictionary will tell you a sane person is one whose actions
are reasonable. Reason, sounds familiar? Something that differentiates past
/prog/ from current /prog/. Reason is importand for a board. Reason is lacking.
/prog/ is turning into an obscure clique of imbeciles playing funny games. The
so called "memes", for example. Or games of other nature, ie repeating what the
previous poster said with a small change in the post. I am sure you have all
seen those. The problem is with the posters that downright assume that's how
it's always been here, and because of that, they join that particular game too.
But, where did these originate from? Hard to tell, maybe parrots in africa. You
will surely see them in other boards (imageboards, textboards doesn't matter).
Exempli gratia, /b/, /vip/, /dqn/, and older boards at 2ch. It's common to do
so and has a name, sarcasm. Repetition leads to innovation, that's what they
say. Innovation does not imply creativity. Sadly, I'm proven to be correct just
by reading a thread or two from /prog/'s index page. So, to name the first
problem, repetition. (note: this is a problem solely in /prog/. The other boards
addressed are doing just fine)

Repetition introduces memes to the board. Memes introduce people to the board.
As we all know, and as a quite popular manual page will tell us, less is more.
(and vice versa; more is less) Quality over quantity, harmony over chaos. One
cannot look forward to quality posts and harmony in a board populated by
unoriginal posters. You can certainly envision the next problem I am about to
name. Staleness. Without any doubt, other places are affected by staleness as
well, as per example, reddit. About reddit, I have posted my previous thoughts
here (http://dis.4chan.org/read/prog/1205555865).

Other minor issues include advertising, meme forcing, homework questions (they
rarely are of any arousment to any programmer solemn about what he does)
I am too tired to post about them, take a look around if you are curious. I
propose we contact moot or some moderator and ask for actions to be taken.
Enforcing on-topic posts would be fabulous. Banning those who bump old topics
wouldn't be bad. There are certain caveats with this solution: I certainly don't
want to see /prog/ turning into a "police state". As it stands, even that would
be better! Another solution is to let the real posters take over the board.
Caveats with this is that there's a high possibility genuine posters get banned
and the morons stay. That'd be the worst. Come on guys, /prog/ used to rock. Do
something about it, contribute instead of all the cockwaving fagfest you are
into now.. FOR THE LOVE OF ANYTHING THAT'S HOLY, FUCK THE MEME BULLSHIT. Don't
be repetitive and avoid staleness.

Now, it is time to name some of the trolls we must avoid. Another problem with
naming repetition is that one simply contributes to that particular repetition,
and achieves something quite different from the original goal. Notwithstanding,
one cannot do something about it, so here I am naming them.
Rechan, any other board other than /prog/. I'm not a 4chan fanboy. Little
matters to me whether one is posting in rechan on 4chan. However I must alert
you why this is a bad thing. Rechan is controlled by one person, someone who
most likely used to post (or still posts) to /prog/. Making your own board means
two things: That you were disappointed and that you want authority over a
popular board. The former; I doubt. The latter is quite certainly true. Once
rechan (or some other board, for that matter) gets popular enough, be certain
that drama will ensue. See, that is impossible to happend with 4chan because
moot frankly does not care. 4chan is too big, and has too many boards to care
about a particular one. So stick to /prog/ guys.

Recursive acronym idiots: No. It's just boring. Most of the time it's not done
properly either (ie the recursive acronym is not really recursive) and I believe
that is done just to annoy those who enjoy the recursive acronym game, which in
return will post some flame and the correct acronym. All that leads to nothing.
It doesn't matter. Enlightened ones will certainly notice an acronym is simply a
collection of patterns with insignificant value. Say no to them. Don't attempt
to post a recursive acronym back to be funny. You'll look stupid like those
people who tell you not to talk in leetspeak because it's lame, in leetspeak.
Avoid like the plague.

SICP/Haskell saga idiots. Well these guys aren't that bad. Sometimes a funny
kopipe will be posted, people will like it, different versions of it will be
posted, and everyone'll be happy. That's fine, but leads to repetition which
leads to previous problems. So try to keep that shit to a minimum level. (note:
sicp is a fine book, haskell a fine language, fanboyism sucks et cetera, Sussman
told you that too)

BBCode morons: Keep it to one thread and it will be fine, no need to polute
every damn thread with (potentially broken) bbcode. BBCode is there to enhance
posts, not to degrade them.

This list is not complete, of course.

Last but not least, why meta-trolling shall not be considered. When you say a
foolish thing, and you get debunked by someone smarter than you, as defence you
could say "ha! you have been trolled". At that point the smart person, if he
really is worth his brains, will simply ignore you. He proved you wrong and
there's nothing more to be said. If you continue, that's when you get trolled.
Not by the other person, but by yourself. It's because you consider the original
poster to be a troll and not a genuine poster, which will lead to an infinite
loop of meta-trolling consideration, and nothing but wasting time will be
achieved. Once someone makes a dumb post, assume he's dumb and not that he's a
troll. At that point there are two options, either ignore or ridicule and move
on. Choose one, choose wisely.

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-15 16:31

>>1
To some extent, I agree. I'm of the opinion that the ideal /prog/ is one that mixes mostly interesting and serious topics in with a bit of nonsense and in-joke silliness. That's what /prog/ used to be like, but now it's mostly just nonsense.

A good current example of this mixture is /r9k/ - perhaps a robot overlord would be a welcome addition to /prog/.

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-15 16:42

OP I think it's you who has the issues.

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-15 16:57

>>6
I think the r9k implementation on /prog/ would be awesome. I'm going to send moot an email about it right now.

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-15 17:07

Haven't read OP. The annoying formatting is presumptuous. So I'll go ahead and presume that the post will be presumptuous, too.

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-15 17:07

>>1
analize
This sounds like fun.

>>6
The board does have a unique character that should be preserved. I certainly agree that mindless posting should be discouraged, however.

>>8
I think /prog/ should create something (not something pointless like anoncoreutils, something that’s actually fun - a game is prime example).

So, who wants to maek gaem? I know there are gaem programmers here.

Name: >>8 2008-04-15 17:13

TO: Moot
CC: /prog/
SUBJECT: Noise on /prog/?

Sup.

I know the general sentiment about the textboards is "4chan has textboards?", and as such it's kind of weird to be sending correspondence about them. Furthermore, treating the r9k extension as a silver bullet, a penultimate panacea, a spaceship operator, etc, is perhaps a little narrow-minded, especially when the existence of a problem has yet to be demonstrated.

For a while now, that small island of /prog/, much like every other board, has been overflowing with what some consider an excess of programming-related memes. While I personally enjoy many of them (you can tune a filesystem, but you cannot tune a fish) and invented many of them myself (much to the surprise of others), I feel like these wonderfully infectious phrases have pushed out what little discourse there was once in the days of yore.

I feel kind of bad about it. :(

Digressing -- certain characteristics of the textboards are unlending to the r9k algorithm, since they not only almost require UNICODE, but have BBCODE. Now you have two problems. Filters can easily be bypassed by using nop'd tags. Removal of either of the issues is a faites-pas in itself, since much of the /prog/ culture is founded upon them.

Long story short, the Sussman cult of personality is fading, people are no longer reading SICP before posting "Read SICP", and any semblance of intelligent discussion is a figment of the past. And I don't have a solution for it.

tl;dr -- if /prog/ came up with a method of self-moderation (like the r9k system), would you consider installing the implementation?

Thanks,
I-couldn't-be-fucked-to-edit-the-cunting-headers,
An anonymous of /prog/

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-15 17:13

>>6
back to /b/

What is it with these people complaining about how X board used to be good but now it's turned to shit due to, and get this, OTHER PEOPLE?

>>10
I'd look forward to seeing the arguments over what language to use, if such a thing ever happened, which it wouldn't.

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-15 17:23

>>12
At least we'd be arguing about something vaguely substantive. ☺

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-15 17:34

>>11
It's not really that hard. You would strip out BBCode tags, post links (e.g. >>1) and normalise any Unicode before hashing the post for the robot to compare.

Actually, I have a full sqlite database of all world4ch posts from when it started to now, so I might write a bit of code to do that and analyse just how much repetition there is. If I can be bothered, I'll post results.

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-15 17:39

>>14
Actually, I have a full sqlite database of all world4ch posts from when it started to now,
What, why?

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-15 17:44

>>15
Just for the hell of it. It's quite interesting for all sorts of analyses, though I've only done some quite trivial ones so far. I'm starting to mess around with full text search algorithms on it. Also it comes in handy sometimes when looking for an old post.

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-15 17:58

>>13
Every argument in /prog/ is substantive.

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-15 17:59

Take a look at this WebHistory link of /prog/ from 2 years ago, and compare it to today
http://tinyurl.com/5o83g8
Notice how we had actual programming discussion back then? Ah, good times.

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-15 18:12

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-15 18:15

>>19
Oh, the Your History (Back in Time) Network website. Very good for looking at old web content.

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-15 18:15

>>18
lol Eric Wong is an OpenID faggot.

Name: Eric Wong 2008-04-15 18:23

>>21
Have... have you been trolled?

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-15 18:44

So here I am again, browsing a text board, trying to make a comprehensible post
which will hopefully depict my rage at its absolute purest form. It quickly gets
boring to debunk trolls and abominations every god damn day of my life, so I'll
summarize it all in this post. I will address most issues and problems this
board (and as a result, it's users) has, propose solutions, analize current and
past trolls, point out Why It's A Useless Thing (tm) to consider meta-trolling
and a few other things. Yes, this will be a rant. Get your popcorn and beer,
people.

Now, why all of the sudden so much RAGE you might rightfully wonder. I'm not a
bedlamite, nor some eccentric nobody. Granted - not completely sane, but who can
claim that? Facts are, past years /prog/ maybe did have some posters who could.
Any credible English dictionary will tell you a sane person is one whose actions
are reasonable. Reason, sounds familiar? Something that differentiates past
/prog/ from current /prog/. Reason is importand for a board. Reason is lacking.
/prog/ is turning into an obscure clique of imbeciles playing funny games. The
so called "penises", for example. Or games of other nature, ie repeating what the
previous poster said with a small change in the post. I am sure you have all
seen those. The problem is with the posters that downright assume that's how
it's always been here, and because of that, they join that particular game too.
But, where did these originate from? Hard to tell, maybe parrots in africa. You
will surely see them in other boards (imageboards, textboards doesn't matter).
Exempli gratia, /b/, /vip/, /dqn/, and older boards at 2ch. It's common to do
so and has a name, sarcasm. Repetition leads to innovation, that's what they
say. Innovation does not imply creativity. Sadly, I'm proven to be correct just
by reading a thread or two from /prog/'s index page. So, to name the first
problem, repetition. (note: this is a problem solely in /prog/. The other boards
addressed are doing just fine)

Repetition introduces penises to the board. Penises introduce people to the board.
As we all know, and as a quite popular manual page will tell us, less is more.
(and vice versa; more is less) Quality over quantity, harmony over chaos. One
cannot look forward to quality posts and harmony in a board populated by
unoriginal posters. You can certainly envision the next problem I am about to
name. Staleness. Without any doubt, other places are affected by staleness as
well, as per example, reddit. About reddit, I have posted my previous thoughts
here (http://dis.4chan.org/read/prog/1205555865).

Other minor issues include advertising, penis forcing, homework questions (they
rarely are of any arousment to any programmer solemn about what he does)
I am too tired to post about them, take a look around if you are curious. I
propose we contact moot or some moderator and ask for actions to be taken.
Enforcing on-topic posts would be fabulous. Banning those who bump old topics
wouldn't be bad. There are certain caveats with this solution: I certainly don't
want to see /prog/ turning into a "police state". As it stands, even that would
be better! Another solution is to let the real posters take over the board.
Caveats with this is that there's a high possibility genuine posters get banned
and the morons stay. That'd be the worst. Come on guys, /prog/ used to rock. Do
something about it, contribute instead of all the cockwaving fagfest you are
into now.. FOR THE LOVE OF ANYTHING THAT'S HOLY, FUCK THE PENIS BULLSHIT. Don't
be repetitive and avoid staleness.

Now, it is time to name some of the trolls we must avoid. Another problem with
naming repetition is that one simply contributes to that particular repetition,
and achieves something quite different from the original goal. Notwithstanding,
one cannot do something about it, so here I am naming them.
Rechan, any other board other than /prog/. I'm not a 4chan fanboy. Little
matters to me whether one is posting in rechan on 4chan. However I must alert
you why this is a bad thing. Rechan is controlled by one person, someone who
most likely used to post (or still posts) to /prog/. Making your own board means
two things: That you were disappointed and that you want authority over a
popular board. The former; I doubt. The latter is quite certainly true. Once
rechan (or some other board, for that matter) gets popular enough, be certain
that drama will ensue. See, that is impossible to happend with 4chan because
moot frankly does not care. 4chan is too big, and has too many boards to care
about a particular one. So stick to /prog/ guys.

Recursive acronym idiots: No. It's just boring. Most of the time it's not done
properly either (ie the recursive acronym is not really recursive) and I believe
that is done just to annoy those who enjoy the recursive acronym game, which in
return will post some flame and the correct acronym. All that leads to nothing.
It doesn't matter. Enlightened ones will certainly notice an acronym is simply a
collection of patterns with insignificant value. Say no to them. Don't attempt
to post a recursive acronym back to be funny. You'll look stupid like those
people who tell you not to talk in leetspeak because it's lame, in leetspeak.
Avoid like the plague.

SICP/Haskell saga idiots. Well these guys aren't that bad. Sometimes a funny
kopipe will be posted, people will like it, different versions of it will be
posted, and everyone'll be happy. That's fine, but leads to repetition which
leads to previous problems. So try to keep that shit to a minimum level. (note:
sicp is a fine book, haskell a fine language, fanboyism sucks et cetera, Sussman
told you that too)

BBCode morons: Keep it to one thread and it will be fine, no need to polute
every damn thread with (potentially broken) bbcode. BBCode is there to enhance
posts, not to degrade them.

This list is not complete, of course.

Last but not least, why meta-trolling shall not be considered. When you say a
foolish thing, and you get debunked by someone smarter than you, as defence you
could say "ha! you have been trolled". At that point the smart person, if he
really is worth his brains, will simply ignore you. He proved you wrong and
there's nothing more to be said. If you continue, that's when you get trolled.
Not by the other person, but by yourself. It's because you consider the original
poster to be a troll and not a genuine poster, which will lead to an infinite
loop of meta-trolling consideration, and nothing but wasting time will be
achieved. Once someone makes a dumb post, assume he's dumb and not that he's a
troll. At that point there are two options, either ignore or ridicule and move
on. Choose one, choose wisely.

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-15 19:50

OP write a book about it lol

Name: /sci/ 2008-04-15 19:55

When nobody posts science on /sci/, /sci/ gets overrun with holocaust threads.  Consequently, the way to better /sci/ is to post more science.

If you want to rid /prog/ of /b/tards, then post some obfuscated code that only a programming expert could decipher.  And keep posting stimulating content until they leave.  You save a board from degeneration by spamming it with content. 

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-15 20:30

>>25
When the question refers to works, it calls them "content", a term that disparages the works: it implies that they are merely filler and the box (or site) they fill is what really matters. It reflects the attitude of a businessman who understands only market value and not artistic value. I disagree with those values so I won't use the word that embodies them.

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-15 21:23

>>25
tl;dr
You keep a board interesting by being interesting

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-16 6:05

>>27
Not quite. You keep it interesting by posting things which are both relevant and stimulating. Some random person could start posting about how Koalas sleep 16 hours a day, sure it's interesting, but is it relevant to programming?

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-16 6:28

NIGGERS

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-16 6:53

Please don't send moot mail about text boards. He can only do worse. Been to image boards lately?

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-16 7:53

>>30
what do you mean?

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-16 8:51

while i applaud the effort to raise the signal/noise ratio, i do feel as if sending moot an email about this isn't going to solve the issue

sure, r9k might cut down on some noise, but at the cost of what? i'm not advocating posting "LISP" 2000 times, but we have to consider the fact that repetition is a part of the culture here. an r9k /prog/ board might be a nice addition, but i'm stronly opposed to imposing it on all of us

adding more rules does sometimes make sense, but i don't believe you can fundamentally change the way people express themselves by changing the system. you might attract/repel certain types of individuals, but you haven't changed anything for the better

for me, the goal in this isn't to have the "i invented that meme" crowd stop posting. i want them to start posting.

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-16 9:05

>>32
This may surprise you, but you are violating the principles of the Queen's English.

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-16 9:19

>>33

not really, english isn't my mother-tongue. care to point out where?

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-16 9:25

>>34
PROTIP: The first letter of the word at the beginning of a sentence is a capital letter.
There are exceptions to this rule but your message did not warrant them.

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-16 9:43

>>35
s/There/They're

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-16 9:51

>>36
4/10.

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-16 10:11

Last but not least, why meta-trolling shall not be considered. When you say a
foolish thing, and you get debunked by someone smarter than you, as defence you
could say "ha! you have been trolled". At that point the smart person, if he
really is worth his brains, will simply ignore you. He proved you wrong and
there's nothing more to be said. If you continue, that's when you get trolled.
Not by the other person, but by yourself. It's because you consider the original
poster to be a troll and not a genuine poster, which will lead to an infinite
loop of meta-trolling consideration, and nothing but wasting time will be
achieved. Once someone makes a dumb post, assume he's dumb and not that he's a
troll. At that point there are two options, either ignore or ridicule and move
on. Choose one, choose wisely.


QFT

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-16 10:23

that's when you get trolled. Not by the other person, but by yourself.
Woah.

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-16 10:28

Well, I am in fact listening to Infected Mushroom while coding Java right now.

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-16 10:37

>>39
Puts a whole new meaning on, "IHBT"

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-16 10:48

>>41
>>39 is meta trolling you, and you didn't realize. YHBT. YHL. HAND.

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-16 11:39

>>38
GB2 Bed, Douglas Hofstadter.

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-16 11:40

>>40
Because you are elite?

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-16 16:36

>>1
MOAR HUGE 80x25 POSTS

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-16 19:29

>>42
You have been trolled... by yourself. Have a nice day.

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-16 19:31

Stop the trolling, trolls.
This isn't /b/. THIS IS /PROOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOG/

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 0:10

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 0:42

Name: Sgt.Kabukiman 2012-05-22 3:36

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

Name: Sgt.Kabukiman 2012-05-22 3:36

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

Name: Anonymous 2012-05-22 7:09

Rei.

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List