Okay, based on my board software research, I am strongly in favour of the opinion that we need more post quoting regexps here.
Name:
Anonymous2007-12-03 11:46
What's the matter, aren't `"' quotes Enterprise-ready yet? Apparently not since they weren't used in the article!
Name:
Anonymous2007-12-03 11:55
`'fail quotes'' fail for the same reason shitCase does.
Name:
Anonymous2007-12-03 12:50
“Unicode double quotes” ‘Unicode single quotes’
Totally agreed on these two. Also, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quotation_mark "ASCII double quotes" 'ASCII single quotes'
These are plain stupid. What, an angular second symbol and an apostrophe?
Name:
Anonymous2007-12-03 14:26
>>19
The ASCII ones are for backwards compatibility. Obviously, any Expert Unicode Writers should be using the “proper quotes”.
Name:
Anonymous2007-12-03 14:28
ONE OF MY EMPLOYEES TRIED TO USE THE OPEN DOUBLE QUOTATION MARK TO SIGNIFY A QUANTITY OF INCHES TODAY. I CORRECTED HIM MOST THOROUGHLY.
>>1
stop using faggot quotes >>2
stop using faggot quotes >>3
stop using faggot quotes >>6
stop using faggot quotes >>17
stop using faggot quotes >>18
stop using faggot quotes >>23
stop using faggot quotes