Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

I solved a problem I dont even understand

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-18 15:23

EVOLUTIONARY ALGORITHMS FUCK YEAH

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-18 15:35

Is that the one where you throw random code at it until it works, and then comment out other lines of code until you've commented out as much as you can without it breaking?

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-18 15:38

Its the one where the code "evolves" solutions using only a solution representation and a quality measure of said representation.

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-18 15:45

That's far less interesting.

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-18 17:18

FANCY RANDOM SEARCH GO

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-18 17:33

>>5
Fancy random search that gets results infinitely faster than a true random search.

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-18 17:45

>>2
Lol, that's how I do it. I didn't know there was a name for that style.

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-18 18:05

>>2
No, that's EXPERT PROGRAMMING.

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-18 21:26

Does anyone seriously use EAs to solve anything? Or it just some academic's plaything?

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-19 1:42

>>9
Only for addition and subtraction.

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-19 6:04

>>10
Bullshit. I've seen an evolutionary multiplication algorithm that can out-calculate me.

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-19 6:52

>>9
Spam classification

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-19 9:27

On my enterprise, we use involutionary development. First we develop a solution. Then the manager adds his professional judgement:
1. I've read in a magazine Java helps reduce TCO, use Java
2. This is not maintainable, develop an object-oriented version of it
3. Let's make it automatic and improve ROI by adding useless features
4. Wait, there's no time to finish this, let's assign five useless fucktards with 5 minutes of experience and an MBA to do it
5. ?????
6. Project cancelled

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-19 9:43

>>13
What is you boss talking about?! Java forces you to use OOP anyways!

sigh Just like the great formula says:
power = work done / time
by common-sense, time = money, knowledge = power
therefore
money = work done / knowledge
lim(knowledge->0) money = infinity

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-19 9:44

>>14
You're confusing Object Obsessed Programming with Object Oriented Programming.

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-20 8:31

>>14
Though the formula he posted is a universal truth.

This is knowledge: Knight of Lambda Calculus > Cfag > Java turd > Web 2.0 metrosexual webmaster with stylish sunglasses and a Mac > manager > MBA motherfucker > CEO

This is money: Knight of Lambda Calculus < Cfag < Java turd < Web 2.0 metrosexual webmaster with stylish sunglasses and a Mac < manager < MBA motherfucker < CEO

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-20 8:34

>>16
You forgot to put God in. He goes between Cfag and Knight of Lambda Calculus.

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-20 11:21

>>14
time does not equal money. time is the inverse of money.

FAIL.

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-20 11:43

>>17
hurrr

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-20 11:54

>>16
>>17
Knight of Lambda Calculus > Haruhi Suzumiya > Cfag > Java turd > Web 2.0 metrosexual webmaster with stylish sunglasses and a Mac > manager > MBA motherfucker > CEO

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-20 15:37

>>20
I see what you did there.

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-20 16:34

>>21
hurtfag butt

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-23 17:50

Listen retards. It annoys me whenever I see you idiots doing this:
>>1
>>2
>>3
>>4
>>5
etc..

Shiichan can reference using post ranges, e.g:
>>1-10

If the posts you wish to reference are not in sequential order, use commas, e.g:
>>1,3,8,10,25

These can be mixed too, e.g:
>>1,2,6,10-15,18,19,24-31,54-62

Knowledge is power.
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List
All trademarks and copyrights on this site are owned by their respective parties. All comments and posts are the responsibility of their own posters.
- Tinychan + 2ch Mode -