Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-4041-

What path should i follow?

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-10 10:10

Hai /prog/ i am interested in becoming a programer as a future carreer , i will be going to my local Community College , but it's a really reputated one so i think it will be good to start then i will transfer to another university since i didnt really do anything in high school. I would like to be a programer so what path do you think i should go with?


thanks

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-10 10:11

read SICP.

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-10 10:28

thats all the help you can give me?

lol wtf is SICP?

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-10 10:30

Haha i'm starting to wonder the same thing, it's a book but i don't understand peoples fascination with it.

I read The C Programming Language to learn C, after that it's pretty much downhill on most languages you would want to learn.

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-10 10:35

>>3
lol, lol, lol you will never become an EXPERT PROGRAMMER

also, have you tried fucking google?

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-10 10:37

Yes i did google it   , but since this is the "Programer" section and not the retard section i thought it would be slightly more help full.

I can do some basic C++ and i am learning to do  more everyday

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-10 10:58

The path to satori.
Read SICP.

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-10 11:13

If you don't read yer SICP, you can't be an EXPERT PROGRAMMER. How can you be an EXPERT PROGRAMMER if you don't read yer SICP?

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-10 11:24

Spoiler: SICP is a highly overrated book (no wonder it isn't used anymore at MIT) and 90% of the people on /prog/ have never read it. It's just a meme, like "lurk moar".

Those who have actually read it and masturbate to it are toy language faggots who couldn't code their way out of a paper bag if their lives depended on it.

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-10 13:27

>>1
programer
Follow the path of proper spelling.

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-10 13:56

>>9
highly overrated?
name couple of books that are better than sicp
and i've read it, and i'm a massive C faggot

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-10 15:04

what those niggas said lol

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-10 15:13

>>9
it isn't used anymore at MIT
Fail. It's still in use.

Needless to say, it's good and I have read SICP. This is just my way to say I've read SICP.

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-10 15:40

>>13
Fail. It's still in use.
Fail. /prog/ toy language fags where in a rage some weeks ago because it, as well as Scheme, were thrown out at MIT. (Or are going to be real soon now.)

Needless to say, it's good and I have read SICP. This is just my way to say I've read SICP.
That's cool. So you're a noob who has read SICP. Maybe if you work hard, you'll be able to actually write usable software in a few years or so. You know, after you get over being pampered by bloated toy languages and realize the theoretical stuff in SICP alone is pretty much worthless in the real world unless you really were a complete greenhorn when you read it.

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-10 15:51

>>9
lulz. So it's overrated. Have you read it? I have (most of it. I actually haven't read the last chapter yet)

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-10 15:55

>>15
Actually I don't need an introductory book on computer programming anymore, thank you very much.

I know you just want to belong to the "in crowd", but bragging about not even having finished SICP is beyond pathetic.

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-10 19:34

>>16
so you haven't read it. so you can't know if it's overrated or not.

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-10 20:54

>>1
Programmers are merely secretaries in the overal scheme.
 
 The designer comes up with the idea, breaks it down in a design document.
 Gives the psudocode/flowcharts to the coders.
 The concept art shit to the art fags and the musical concept to the sound engineers and then proceeds to cash his paycheque and snort cocain off a hookers ass whilst the coders impliment the design.
 
 If you want to be a coder expect to work long hours, get paid a meagre wage and have almost no say in the overall design concept.
 
 And maek vidya gaems is NOT nearly as fun as it sounds.
 Fact 1: in the commercial world you will have no say in what your making.
 Fact 2: you will be making a game you loathe, hate puzzle gaems? thats what you'll be building.
 Fact 3: Even though you loathe it now thats nothing compared to how much you will six months down the line when youve been working with it for 18hrs a day.
 Fact 4: Your an expendable member of the team, any fucking college dropout can sufficiently code a few functions and they all thing "MAEK VIDYA GAEMS" is an easy career choice.
 Fact 5: VIDYA GAEMS CODARZ get paid less than coding anywhere else in the industry.
 Fact 6: If your still reading this and not horrified at the prospect of becomming yet another broken desk monkey then your pretty much cut out for the industry.

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-10 21:12

>>18

Learn English.

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-10 21:21

SICP is rad, fuck all ya haters

On top of that

Read the kernigan and richie book on the C programming language
It'll teach you everything you need to know about C in ~100 pages

Download "The Art of Computer Programming" By Donald Knuth  It's pretty long to read straight through, but it makes a great reference.  If you can't read the whole thing just read the bits and pieces that you find interesting/challenging

Last, get a linux or a unix box and practice practice practice.
Do exercises from books or come up with cool tasks urself.

Generally programs that would see cool to a user aren't good for learning, cause users like shit like fluffy interfaces and pretty graphics which are more tedious to code than educational. Focus on things with neat algorithms/data structures and shite interfaces

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-10 22:12

>>19
YHBT. YHL. HAND.

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-10 22:28

Read the specification for C, C++, C#, Java, and JavaScript. And spend lots of time using each. Then spend lots of time using PHP, Python, and Ruby. Also throw in some toy language like Lisp, OCaml, Erlang, etc.

The only good way to become a programmer is through practice. Lots and lots of practice. It's that easy. It's that hard. Just do it.

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-10 23:29

>>21
YHBT. YHL. HAND.

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-10 23:45

>>21
>>23
YHBT. YHL. HAND.

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-10 23:50

>>21,23-24

Shut up and get the fuck out.

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-11 0:54

>>25
You have been trolled. Consequently, you have lost. At this moment I would bid a good day, sir.

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-11 1:13

>>26

No, I haven't been. You pretentious prick.

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-11 1:39

>>25
>>26
>>27
>>26
>>25
>>24
>>23
>>27
>>26
YHBT. YHL. HAND.

YHBT. YHL. HAND.

YHBT. YHL. HAND.

YHBT. YHL. HAND.

YHBT. YHL. HAND.

YHBT. YHL. HAND.

YHBT. YHL. HAND.

YHBT. YHL. HAND.

YHBT. YHL. HAND.

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-11 4:46

>>17
I haven't read it completely, I just had a look at the TOC and read a few lines here and there. It's certainly a solid book, but people here are being retards about it.

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-11 5:48

>>29
few lines here and there?
First chapter might be 'easy' for an intermediate programmer.. read further.

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-11 5:55

>>29
but people here are being retards about it.
If you haven't already noticed, people here are being retards about absolutely everything.

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-11 10:59

>>30
SICP is a book for beginners. Get over yourself. If it's too hard for you, GB2 the humanities and above all [b]STOP CLAIMING ON /PROG/ THAT YOU HAVE ACHIEVED SOMETHING BECAUSE YOU READ AN [u]INTRODUCTORY BOOK ON PROGRAMMING[/u][/b].

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-11 12:10

>>32 clearly hasn't read SICP

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-11 12:31

>>3
Well obviously; that's why he failed [supBBCode[/sup].

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-11 12:35

>>34
lol at double irony

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-11 12:36

/r/ BBCode compiler/interpreter/IDE

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-11 13:18

The EXPERT PROGRAMMER who made Shiichan definitely hasn't read SICP.

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-11 13:22

>>37
Shiichan's BBCode parser wasn't written by Shii. It's third-party code.

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-11 13:26

>>38
Well, SICP would've taught him how to write his own (working) BBCode parser.

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-11 13:33

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-11 13:46

>>40
no.

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-06 15:11

PHP function d imageFolder?

Name: Anonymous 2010-11-13 10:35

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-23 9:49


Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List