HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAAHAHAAAA!!!
you think your tough huh?
two words Sussman and Abelson.
i have written two programming books at the same time in less than 5 seconds i have been training for 3 years.
also SICP,On Lisp,and TAoCP.
you might be stronger than me,but i know im smarterer and quicker with shift-0.
i only weigh 130 pounds pure lean parentheses.
one argument you'll be on your way to reread SICP.
your the one whose a homo.i can get Julie Sussman anytime i want you probably haven't ever been laid before.
you probably have sex with your REPL.
you don't even know me,and you don't want to.
you'll be lucky if your even worth the apply one lambda and you'll recurse forever.
though i'd be hapy to humiliate you in front of all your friends.
btw IM the best.
i have trolled in Slashdot, Reddit, Digg,paulgraham.com, Craigslist,MIT,world4chan.org.
never lost an internet fight!
im undefeated in competitive forced indentation/parenthesis counting.
im on my way to Nirvana.
go ahead and come step anytime you want.b*tch
>>2
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAAHAHAAAA!!!
you think your tough huh?
Name:
Anonymous2007-10-08 14:59
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAAHAHAAAA!!!
you think your tough huh?
one word THE FORCED INDENTATION OF CODE.
i have taken out two mission critical applications at the same time in less than 5 seconds i have been training for 3 years.
also enterprise grade best practices.
your compiler might be bigger than me,but i know mine is smarter and quicker.
my compiler is 130 kb pure lean code.
one keystroke and i'll overflow your buffers.
your the one whose a nerd.i can optimize CFLAGS anytime i want you probably haven't ever touched CFLAGS before.
you probably have sex with your computer.
you don't even know me,and you don't want to.
you'll be lucky if your even worth my attention one look at my code and you'll dissappear forever.
though i'd be hapy to humiliate you in front of all your friends.
btw IM the expertest.
i have worked in maine, new hampshire, new york,utah, colorado,florida,bahamas.
never indented my code!
im undefeated in competitive obfuscation of code.
im on my way to IOCCC.
go ahead and come step anytime you want.b*tch
Name:
Alan J. Perlis2007-10-08 15:01
>>1
I think that it's extraordinarily important that we in computer science keep fun in computing. When it started out, it was an awful lot of fun. Of course, the paying customers got shafted every now and then, and after a while we began to take their complaints seriously. We began to feel as if we really were responsible for the successful, error-free perfect use of these machines. I don't think we are. I think we're responsible for stretching them, setting them off in new directions, and keeping fun in the house. I hope the field of computer science never loses its sense of fun. Above all, I hope we don't become missionaries. Don't feel as if you're Bible salesmen. The world has too many of those already. What you know about computing other people will learn. Don't feel as if the key to successful computing is only in your hands. What's in your hands, I think and hope, is intelligence: the ability to see the machine as more than when you were first led up to it, that you can make it more
>>5
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAAHAHAAAA!!!
you think your tough huh?
Name:
Anonymous2007-10-08 17:53
In our study of program design, we have seen that expert programmers control the complexity of their designs with the same general techniques used by designers of all complex systems. They combine primitive elements to form compound objects, they abstract compound objects to form higher-level building blocks, and they preserve modularity by adopting appropriate large-scale views of system structure. In illustrating these techniques, we have used Lisp as a language for describing processes and for constructing computational data objects and processes to model complex phenomena in the real world. However, as we confront increasingly complex problems, we will find that Lisp, or indeed any fixed programming language, is not sufficient for our needs. We must constantly turn to new languages in order to express our ideas more effectively. Establishing new languages is a powerful strategy for controlling complexity in engineering design; we can often enhance our ability to deal with a complex problem by adopting a new language that enables us to describe (and hence to think about) the problem in a different way, using primitives, means of combination, and means of abstraction that are particularly well suited to the problem at hand.1
Name:
Anonymous2007-10-08 17:56
>>8
First paragraph of the fourth Chapter, just read it about two weeks ago.
Name:
Anonymous2007-10-09 12:05
>>9
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAAHAHAAAA!!!
you think your tough huh?
RECIEVE SPEC ---> CODE AGAINST -------------------------------┐
| BAD SPEC |
V |
REQUEST |
USABLE SPEC |
| |
V |
CODE TO SPEC ---> CODE TO WHAT ------------------------------┤
| IT WANTS |
V |
RECIEVE REQUESTS |
FOR NEW FEATURE -> IGNORE THEM |
| | |
| VISIT FROM UPPER -> PROJECT OUTSOURCED |
| MANAGEMENT TO INDIA |
V | |
AGREE TO DO | |
NEW FEATURES <---------┘ |
| |
V |
DEADLINE -----> ADD CODERS |
PRESSURE | |
| | |
V V |
PUSH BACK ┌--- OVER BUDGET -------┐ V
SCHEDULE | | | ┌---------> [b]FAILURE[/b]
| | V V | Λ
| | BEG FOR MORE DO IT ON ----┘ |
| | CASH THE CHEAP |
| | | |
| | V |
| | CASH OVERRUNS |
| | OUTED BY ACCOUNTING ---------------------------┤
| | |
V └----┐ |
DITCH FEATURES <--┘ |
| |
V |
REWRITE LARGE |
SWATHS OF CODE |
| |
V |
TESTING -----> FIND MISSING |
| FEATURES |
V | |
FIND AND V |
RESOLVE BUGS HASTILY HACK -------------------------------┘
| SOFTWARE
V
[b]SUCCESS:[/b]
[b]SHIP SOFTWARE[/b]
RECIEVE SPEC ---> CODE AGAINST -------------------------------┐
| BAD SPEC |
V |
REQUEST |
USABLE SPEC |
| |
V |
CODE TO SPEC ---> CODE TO WHAT ------------------------------┤
| IT WANTS |
V |
RECIEVE REQUESTS |
FOR NEW FEATURE -> IGNORE THEM |
| | |
| VISIT FROM UPPER -> PROJECT OUTSOURCED |
| MANAGEMENT TO INDIA |
V | |
AGREE TO DO | |
NEW FEATURES <---------┘ |
| |
V |
DEADLINE -----> ADD CODERS |
PRESSURE | |
| | |
V V |
PUSH BACK ┌--- OVER BUDGET -------┐ V
SCHEDULE | | | ┌--------->FAILURE
| | V V | Λ
| | BEG FOR MORE DO IT ON ----┘ |
| | CASH THE CHEAP |
| | | |
| | V |
| | CASH OVERRUNS |
| | OUTED BY ACCOUNTING ---------------------------┤
| | |
V └----┐ |
DITCH FEATURES <--┘ |
| |
V |
REWRITE LARGE |
SWATHS OF CODE |
| |
V |
TESTING -----> FIND MISSING |
| FEATURES |
V | |
FIND AND V |
RESOLVE BUGS HASTILY HACK -------------------------------┘
| SOFTWARE
VSUCCESS:SHIP SOFTWARE [/code]
RECIEVE SPEC ---> CODE AGAINST -------------------------------┐
| BAD SPEC |
V |
REQUEST |
USABLE SPEC |
| |
V |
CODE TO SPEC ---> CODE TO WHAT ------------------------------┤
| IT WANTS |
V |
RECIEVE REQUESTS |
FOR NEW FEATURE -> IGNORE THEM |
| | |
| VISIT FROM UPPER -> PROJECT OUTSOURCED |
| MANAGEMENT TO INDIA |
V | |
AGREE TO DO | |
NEW FEATURES <---------┘ |
| |
V |
DEADLINE -----> ADD CODERS |
PRESSURE | |
| | |
V V |
PUSH BACK ┌--- OVER BUDGET -------┐ V
SCHEDULE | | | ┌--------->FAILURE
| | V V | Λ
| | BEG FOR MORE DO IT ON ----┘ |
| | CASH THE CHEAP |
| | | |
| | V |
| | CASH OVERRUNS |
| | OUTED BY ACCOUNTING ---------------------------┤
| | |
V └----┐ |
DITCH FEATURES <--┘ |
| |
V |
REWRITE LARGE |
SWATHS OF CODE |
| |
V |
TESTING -----> FIND MISSING |
| FEATURES |
V | |
FIND AND V |
RESOLVE BUGS HASTILY HACK -------------------------------┘
| SOFTWARE
V SUCCESS:SHIP SOFTWARE [/code]
RECIEVE SPEC ---> CODE AGAINST -------------------------------┐
| BAD SPEC |
V |
REQUEST |
USABLE SPEC |
| |
V |
CODE TO SPEC ---> CODE TO WHAT ------------------------------┤
| IT WANTS |
V |
RECIEVE REQUESTS |
FOR NEW FEATURE -> IGNORE THEM |
| | |
| VISIT FROM UPPER -> PROJECT OUTSOURCED |
| MANAGEMENT TO INDIA |
V | |
AGREE TO DO | |
NEW FEATURES <---------┘ |
| |
V |
DEADLINE -----> ADD CODERS |
PRESSURE | |
| | |
V V |
PUSH BACK ┌--- OVER BUDGET -------┐ V
SCHEDULE | | | ┌---------> FAILURE
| | V V | Λ
| | BEG FOR MORE DO IT ON ----┘ |
| | CASH THE CHEAP |
| | | |
| | V |
| | CASH OVERRUNS |
| | OUTED BY ACCOUNTING ---------------------------┤
| | |
V └----┐ |
DITCH FEATURES <--┘ |
| |
V |
REWRITE LARGE |
SWATHS OF CODE |
| |
V |
TESTING -----> FIND MISSING |
| FEATURES |
V | |
FIND AND V |
RESOLVE BUGS HASTILY HACK -------------------------------┘
| SOFTWARE
V SUCCESS:SHIP SOFTWARE
RECIEVE SPEC ---> CODE AGAINST -------------------------------┐
| BAD SPEC |
V |
REQUEST |
USABLE SPEC |
| |
V |
CODE TO SPEC ---> CODE TO WHAT ------------------------------┤
| IT WANTS |
V |
RECIEVE REQUESTS |
FOR NEW FEATURE -> IGNORE THEM |
| | |
| VISIT FROM UPPER -> PROJECT OUTSOURCED |
| MANAGEMENT TO INDIA |
V | |
AGREE TO DO | |
NEW FEATURES <---------┘ |
| |
V |
DEADLINE -----> ADD CODERS |
PRESSURE | |
| | |
V V |
PUSH BACK ┌--- OVER BUDGET -------┐ V
SCHEDULE | | | ┌---------> FAILURE
| | V V | Λ
| | BEG FOR MORE DO IT ON ----┘ |
| | CASH THE CHEAP |
| | | |
| | V |
| | CASH OVERRUNS |
| | OUTED BY ACCOUNTING ---------------------------┤
| | |
V └----┐ |
DITCH FEATURES <--┘ |
| |
V |
REWRITE LARGE |
SWATHS OF CODE |
| |
V |
TESTING -----> FIND MISSING |
| FEATURES |
V | |
FIND AND V |
RESOLVE BUGS HASTILY HACK -------------------------------┘
| SOFTWARE
V SUCCESS:SHIP SOFTWARE
RECIEVE SPEC ---> CODE AGAINST -------------------------------┐
| BAD SPEC |
V |
REQUEST |
USABLE SPEC |
| |
V |
CODE TO SPEC ---> CODE TO WHAT ------------------------------┤
| IT WANTS |
V |
RECIEVE REQUESTS |
FOR NEW FEATURE -> IGNORE THEM |
| | |
| VISIT FROM UPPER -> PROJECT OUTSOURCED |
| MANAGEMENT TO INDIA |
V | |
AGREE TO DO | |
NEW FEATURES <---------┘ |
| |
V |
DEADLINE -----> ADD CODERS |
PRESSURE | |
| | |
V V |
PUSH BACK ┌--- OVER BUDGET -------┐ V
SCHEDULE | | | ┌---------> FAILURE
| | V V | Λ
| | BEG FOR MORE DO IT ON ----┘ |
| | CASH THE CHEAP |
| | | |
| | V |
| | CASH OVERRUNS |
| | OUTED BY ACCOUNTING ---------------------------┤
| | |
V └----┐ |
DITCH FEATURES <--┘ |
| |
V |
REWRITE LARGE |
SWATHS OF CODE |
| |
V |
TESTING -----> FIND MISSING |
| FEATURES |
V | |
FIND AND V |
RESOLVE BUGS HASTILY HACK -------------------------------┘
| SOFTWARE
V SUCCESS:SHIP SOFTWARE
RECIEVE SPEC ---> CODE AGAINST -------------------------------┐
| BAD SPEC |
V |
REQUEST |
USABLE SPEC |
| |
V |
CODE TO SPEC ---> CODE TO WHAT ------------------------------┤
| IT WANTS |
V |
RECIEVE REQUESTS |
FOR NEW FEATURE -> IGNORE THEM |
| | |
| VISIT FROM UPPER -> PROJECT OUTSOURCED |
| MANAGEMENT TO INDIA |
V | |
AGREE TO DO | |
NEW FEATURES <---------┘ |
| |
V |
DEADLINE -----> ADD CODERS |
PRESSURE | |
| | |
V V |
PUSH BACK ┌--- OVER BUDGET -------┐ V
SCHEDULE | | | ┌---------> FAILURE
| | V V | Λ
| | BEG FOR MORE DO IT ON ----┘ |
| | CASH THE CHEAP |
| | | |
| | V |
| | CASH OVERRUNS |
| | OUTED BY ACCOUNTING ---------------------------┤
| | |
V └----┐ |
DITCH FEATURES <--┘ |
| |
V |
REWRITE LARGE |
SWATHS OF CODE |
| |
V |
TESTING -----> FIND MISSING |
| FEATURES |
V | |
FIND AND V |
RESOLVE BUGS HASTILY HACK -------------------------------┘
| SOFTWARE
V SUCCESS:
SHIP SOFTWARE
RECIEVE SPEC ---> CODE AGAINST -------------------------------┐
| BAD SPEC |
V |
REQUEST |
USABLE SPEC |
| |
V |
CODE TO SPEC ---> CODE TO WHAT ------------------------------┤
| IT WANTS |
V |
RECIEVE REQUESTS |
FOR NEW FEATURE -> IGNORE THEM |
| | |
| VISIT FROM UPPER -> PROJECT OUTSOURCED |
| MANAGEMENT TO INDIA |
V | |
AGREE TO DO | |
NEW FEATURES <---------┘ |
| |
V |
DEADLINE -----> ADD CODERS |
PRESSURE | |
| | |
V V |
PUSH BACK ┌--- OVER BUDGET -------┐ V
SCHEDULE | | | ┌---------> FAILURE
| | V V | Λ
| | BEG FOR MORE DO IT ON ----┘ |
| | CASH THE CHEAP |
| | | |
| | V |
| | CASH OVERRUNS |
| | OUTED BY ACCOUNTING ---------------------------┤
| | |
V └----┐ |
DITCH FEATURES <--┘ |
| |
V |
REWRITE LARGE |
SWATHS OF CODE |
| |
V |
TESTING -----> FIND MISSING |
| FEATURES |
V | |
FIND AND V |
RESOLVE BUGS HASTILY HACK -------------------------------┘
| SOFTWARE
V SUCCESS:
SHIP SOFTWARE
Name:
Anonymous2007-10-17 18:30
l tsrif erew uoy nehw naht erom sa enihcam eht ees ot ytiliba
e e
d h
t
u oba wonk uoy tahW .ydaerla esoht fo ynam oot sah dlrow
p u :
t e e
t h c
o c if eht epoh I .esuoh eht ni nuf gnipeek dna sn T n
o e o e
i m l i . g
t p d t n i
, u su tcefrep eerf-rorre ,lufsseccus eht c e l
t o e r e m l
t i f o r s e
h n o f i e t
a g c f elihw a retfa dna ,neht dna w d l n
t o w o e a i
o m t e n l w s
y t p h b e s
o h u e b saw ti ,tuo detrats ti y i n e i
u e t s e r s l
r e e g a n e n n b ,
c r a n e v o i i e
a p m n w taht tnatrop h e p B p
n e s a a e m W s f o
o c c t w i d e f e h
m p i h o f i . e r o r
a l e i u n ht kni y g t ' d
k e n n t l a h l n f e m u n
e c e a c t t i i a r e o a
w e s k l o I r t h e h y
i i . e o m i a u s w t k
l n t p t n p f n
m l e I t u ' i m t y g i i
o v h o t s extraord o o l n h
r l e d e f e c g l i s t
e e r o i r a t a
. a n r f n s e t I
r l ' u science keep fun i r r e l
n o t c n e s e ,
. s o . m e e s
e t m o w , f d
D s h p Of course, the paying cust m n
o i l f e t a
n i n a i h ' h
' t k i t n
t s nts seriously. We began to feel as o r
w g D u
f s e n o
e e i . y
e n are. I think we're responsible for stretch s
l s e n
e i i
a r
s of fun. Above all, I hope we don't become missiona s
'
i t
f a
the key to successful computing is only in your hands. Wh
>>26>>22 spent like 30 mins making that, and you `lol` at >>25? shame on you
Name:
Anonymous2007-10-18 9:03
>>27
godammit you fucking nigger. he wrote a script to do the task.
sigh.. i bet you're the kind of person that manually renames all file extensions/removes suffixes/prefixes etc.