Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

IM DA MUHFUGGEN SUSSMAN

Name: Anonymous 2007-10-08 14:22

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAAHAHAAAA!!!
you think your tough huh?
two words Sussman and Abelson.
i have written two programming books at the same time in less than 5 seconds i have been training for 3 years.
also SICP,On Lisp,and TAoCP.
you might be stronger than me,but i know im smarterer and quicker with shift-0.
i only weigh 130 pounds pure lean parentheses.
one argument you'll be on your way to reread SICP.
your the one whose a homo.i can get Julie Sussman anytime i want you probably haven't ever been laid before.
you probably have sex with your REPL.
you don't even know me,and you don't want to.
you'll be lucky if your even worth the apply one lambda and you'll recurse forever.
though i'd be hapy to humiliate you in front of all your friends.
btw IM the best.
i have trolled in Slashdot, Reddit, Digg,paulgraham.com, Craigslist,MIT,world4chan.org.
never lost an internet fight!
im undefeated in competitive forced indentation/parenthesis counting.
im on my way to Nirvana.
go ahead and come step anytime you want.b*tch

Name: Anonymous 2007-10-08 17:53

In our study of program design, we have seen that expert programmers control the complexity of their designs with the same general techniques used by designers of all complex systems. They combine primitive elements to form compound objects, they abstract compound objects to form higher-level building blocks, and they preserve modularity by adopting appropriate large-scale views of system structure. In illustrating these techniques, we have used Lisp as a language for describing processes and for constructing computational data objects and processes to model complex phenomena in the real world. However, as we confront increasingly complex problems, we will find that Lisp, or indeed any fixed programming language, is not sufficient for our needs. We must constantly turn to new languages in order to express our ideas more effectively. Establishing new languages is a powerful strategy for controlling complexity in engineering design; we can often enhance our ability to deal with a complex problem by adopting a new language that enables us to describe (and hence to think about) the problem in a different way, using primitives, means of combination, and means of abstraction that are particularly well suited to the problem at hand.1

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List